User talk:Gazeteci Sabah 1453

August 2021
Hello, I'm Notfrompedro. I noticed that you recently removed content from Abdullah Al-Nafisi without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Notfrompedro (talk) 13:46, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Notfrompedro. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 15:01, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Haber7.com


A tag has been placed on Haber7.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 10:24, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ali Al Suleiman (writer)


The page Ali Al Suleiman (writer) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Liz Read! Talk! 00:04, 12 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Please stop trying to use Wikipedia to promote yourself and your career. This is an encyclopedia, not LinkedIn. Liz Read! Talk! 00:58, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:01, 12 August 2021 (UTC)


 * I've received several emails from this user, asking for help with this article. I do believe they have block-evaded rather than request unblock, so won't question the new block here, but their emails to me claim that the article isn't promotional, that they don't know how to explain this, and that they have a BBC Turkey source, too. Perhaps the article should be given a chance (I had also added independent sources in refideas on the talkpage, assuming they would be able to incorporate the sources); if Liz has past experience and knows it is just promo, so be it, but if there are suitable sources about a Middle Eastern translator to confirm GNG, we only require Sabah declare COI if that is indeed the case. Keeping in mind how hard it can be to source non-Western topics, some more inquiry seems fair. Kingsif (talk) 09:58, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * It was "given a chance" at AfD, where the result was Delete and salt. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:23, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Every delete !vote was based on the fact that the user creating an equivalent at the French Wikipedia went about doing it wrong. The only !vote based on quality and notability was to keep. So maybe a real chance should be given. Kingsif (talk) 17:05, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * My !vote had nothing to do with the French or any other Wikipedia, and only one !vote even mentions that; plenty of other cogent articles for deletion were advanced in the discussion.OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:06, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello hope you are well Kingsif Liz, firstly As a Turkish citizen, I don't have any personal connection with this person ,Also this editor Silver seren is against deleting the article and has experience in this matter, also there are a lot of independent sources talking about him like TRT World According to Wikipedia, Reliable sources/Perennial sources, a reliable source for news that is not related to the Turkish government also Anadolu Agency Daily Sabah Yeni Şafak Yeni Akit, also This is a source Gunboyu gazetesi anti-Turkish government who spoke about this man, And here we have sources independent of the Turkish government talked about Ali, such as İstiklal Akşam Diriliş Postası I hope this is taken into consideration, because we shouldn't prevent writing an article about someone with significant coverage. Because there is a personal dispute between him and someone All Respect --Gazeteci Sabah TR (talk) 12:38, 12 August 2021 (UTC)