User talk:Gaziantep2012

Welcome!

Hello, Gaziantep2012, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 14:49, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Karkemish
Perhaps you could start a discussion at Talk:Carchemish about the title of the article? Read WP:Title first. I've added the link you sent me to the external links section of the article. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 14:53, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

The standard transcription of the toponoym KARKAMISH from cuneiform and hieroglyphic Luwian sources is constantly with K and not with C in the scholarly world. Woolley's transcription Carchemish was soon outdated although it has remained in the anglo-saxon world for reasons of simple inertia (but the most influential Corpus by David Hawkins is with K and not with C!). Have a look at the most recent publication by the expedition digging at the site: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5615/neareastarch.75.issue-3 The main entry of Wikipedia should thus be Karkemish and not Carchemish

Raw links
Pleases fix these per WP:CITE, we shouldn't have raw urls and it should be clear in the reference what the source is. I don't have time to do this myself and if you can't, perhaps it will be better just to revert. Doug Weller (talk) 15:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Ok got it, will update them, cheers

Carchemish and original research
Some of your changes appear to be a violation of our no original research policy. If you can show that they are in the inline sources referenced for the text you changed, please discuss at the talk page. Otherwise, please make sure you don't change sourced text or add your own opinions. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 17:11, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

July 2019
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Carchemish into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.  Grey joy talk 09:40, 26 July 2019 (UTC)


 * I've fixed the poor grammar (poor because it was made a stand-alone article) and removed the information about a town, which might have been related to the original article but not to the new one - did you not notice that/ Doug Weller  talk 11:45, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Carchemish, you may be blocked from editing. Doug Weller talk 11:46, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 11:50, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Jerablus Tahtani (tell)
Hello, Gaziantep2012,

Thank you for creating Jerablus Tahtani (tell).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Thank you for your new article on Jerablus Tahtani. Please consider expanding the article with information on new findings if the archeologists continue the excavation project in the near future."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 14:27, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Qadis Survey Project moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Qadis Survey Project, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:09, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Qadis Survey Project


Hello, Gaziantep2012. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Qadis Survey Project".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:25, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm Serols. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nineveh Governorate, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)