User talk:Gazimoff/Archives/2008/April

VG Barnstar for your recent work for the VG Project

 * Wow... just Wow! Many thanks!--Gazimoff (talk) 21:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Orange Box FAC
I don't know about you, but I feel its probably a good idea to let the FAC fail, so that the issues brought up can be dealt with at our own pace. There's still a substantive amount of work to do and my drive (for want of a better word) for editting the article has somewhat dissipated due to editting it so much. I'm going to take a break from editting the article, and come back at the stuff raised in the FAC with a clear head. -- Sabre (talk) 10:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, looks like everyone else lost interest in the FAC. It was closed by a bot, which really isn't that helpful. -- Sabre (talk) 18:51, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

New messages from Voyagerfan5761
Finally got around to going through my talk page... :D Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 16:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Tafl games
Greetings! I would like to request your feedback on the article Tafl games. My goal is to get the article up to WP:GA standards, and I am ready to make the necessary changes to improve the quality of this article. Your thoughts and ideas would be most appreciated! Feel free to post your review on the article's talk page or on my talk page. Thank you for your time. Wilhelm meis (talk) 17:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Maressa Orzack
Thank you for your recent edits. Unfortunately they were on an old sandbox version of the article at User:Gazimoff/Maressa Orzack. I've since moved the article over to Maressa Orzack in the mainspace, which I'm currently developing. I should really tag the old ones for speedy deletion as they are old sandboxes that are now surplus.

Having said that, thankyou for your interest in the article and for taking the time to edit it, it's much appreciated. Many thanks! Gazimoff (talk) 07:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. It was on the unassessed list of articles in the WikiBio section.  I review and assess unassessed articles for WikiBio and WikiOregon.  Thanks for creating new articles and using a sandbox in the first place.  Have a good weekend. C. Williams (talk) 11:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:24 the game interrogation.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:24 the game interrogation.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anthøny 23:10, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Orange Box FAC overturn?
I take it you didn't get anywhere with the attempt to overturn the bot-closed FAC for the Orange Box, since I've not heard anything on it for a while. -- Sabre (talk) 14:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I knew I'd forgotten something. I'll get on to it immediately. First step is to start a peer review and contact all the original FAC editors asking for input. Then once peer review is complete arrange for re-review at FAC. I'll get on to arranging the peer review and contacting the original editors now. Stay tuned! Gazimoff (talk) 14:40, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I'll comment on the PR when I can. · AndonicO  Engage. 15:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Will get to that soon. · AndonicO  Engage. 20:05, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't really have anything further to add in terms of edits (I thought it was fine before I put it into FAC), but I'll try to help out with the peer review. -- Sabre (talk) 18:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Peer Review
Hey Gazimoff. I've already said to User: S@bre that I'd look at Starcraft for him today, and also to User: Guyinblack25 that I'd give him some feedback about his VG guide. So, I should be able to give it a look tomorrow and give comprehensive feedback. Thanks for asking. I hope things go well for the article. Ashnard Talk  Contribs  15:27, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm bogged down with coursework and other things, so I can't get back to the PR immediately. I'll try to manage a response some time this week. Thanks. Ashnard  Talk  Contribs  15:37, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

SC Ghost review
I've posted a response to your review that you should probably look over. Thanks for doing it though, its cleared the assessment table nicely. --Sabre (talk) 20:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:42, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: FAC
Go right ahead. -- Sabre (talk) 20:44, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Roblox
Did you post to the correct AfD discussion? Corvus cornix talk  22:49, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. I've issued a warning to that account.   Corvus cornix  talk  23:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)