User talk:Gazza8946

Nomination of Sentient PPM for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sentient PPM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sentient PPM until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. OSbornarfcontribs. 23:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:48, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment Thanks heaps, was trying to work out how to get the timestamp at the end. --Gazza8946 (talk) 01:54, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

A little help
Hi there Gazza8946. I am a fairly active editor at articles for deletion, and seeing as you're new and trying to get the article Sentient PPM to pass the deletion discussion at Articles_for_deletion/Sentient_PPM, and sometimes it's hard when you're new to work everything out, I thought I might point you in the right direction. In general, for something to be notable enough to merit its own article on Wikipedia, it must have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. To see exactly what that means, check out WP:GNG and for more information just WP:N. If your looking for the right type of sources which together suggest the subject is notable enough for its own article, then you should bear what I just said and the information in the links I just cited. Hope this helps you a bit! Jay Σεβαστός discuss  14:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SentientSoftware Logo.png.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:SentientSoftware Logo.png.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:55, 14 April 2011 (UTC)