User talk:Gballard

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your draft submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia&. If there is no response within seven days, the request may be declined. If this happens, please feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text  to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Sceptre (talk) 18:46, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Scott Keadle
I have moved this to become an article. There are still minor issues with the article, it needs to be more neutral, and sourced as far as possible from |reliable sources - this is going to exclude stuff written by or for the subject as far as his career is concerned at least. I will attempt to look in at the article again and see how it is going. Rich Farmbrough, 04:15, 7 November 2011 (UTC).


 * I have changed the first reference to a full citation. The rest should follow suit. Rich Farmbrough, 04:37, 7 November 2011 (UTC).

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your draft submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia&. If there is no response within seven days, the request may be declined. If this happens, please feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text  to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you.  Chzz  ► 01:20, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Scott Keadle for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Keadle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Scott Keadle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JoannaSerah (talk) 18:33, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Scott Keadle for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Keadle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Scott Keadle& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hemmers (talk) 10:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC)