User talk:Gbgbgbgbj

Welcome!
Hi Gbgbgbgbj! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:



You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:



If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:



Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Sdkb (talk) 04:59, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Unbreakable (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 15:41, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Jigsaw: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack moved to draftspace
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Jigsaw: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack, from its old location at Jigsaw: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. --Killarnee ( T•1•2 ) 01:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Saw II (score), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 12:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 12:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Lion King (franchise). -- puddleglum  2.0  02:47, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. all the best, -- puddleglum  2.0  02:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Citing sources
Hi Gbgbgbgbj, I'm reaching out to you because, as you can see from the messages above this one, some users have expressed concern about your changing articles without citing sources, or reading the material you are changing properly. Editing like that can be seen as disruptive - I understand that you're new, and it does take a while to learn the ropes here, but you need to start responding to people's concerns and figuring out how to edit constructively. Please allow me to suggest some reading for you: Can I also add that you really need to read the content you are editing carefully before making changes to it. This and this, for example, are not improvements. I'd be happy to explain why to you if you're not sure, but I think if you read the entire sentences carefully you'll see it. Cheers Girth Summit  (blether)  09:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * CITE explains how to cite sources when you insert information. I find that the easiest way to do that is with the 'Cite' tool, which should be just above your editing window. Click on it, select one of the templates from the drop-down window, and fill in the details.
 * RS describes what are considered to be reliable sources. Don't use anything that doesn't fit the description there. To be clear, websites such as fandom.com are not acceptable sources (see the part about user-generated content).
 * Notability is worth reading too, it discusses which subjects are sufficiently notable for us to have an article about (and what sort of sourcing is required to make that determination).

Disambiguation link notification for July 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Saw media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franchise ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_Saw_media check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_Saw_media?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Lion King II: Simba's Pride, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Last warning
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 12:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Lion King (2019 film), you may be blocked from editing. ''What is in infobox must match what is in article or have an attached reference or be a copy of what is in the film credits. What you were adding is also false as influenced by is the best that can be supported which is far from being based on. Also based on is a formal credit and if it were true Shakespeare would have gotten an explicit credit in the film which he didn't.'' Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Shapeshifting Detective


The article The Shapeshifting Detective has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced, no indication of WP:notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 06:53, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

The Shapeshifting Detective moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The Shapeshifting Detective, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 06:18, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Shapeshifting Detective


A tag has been placed on The Shapeshifting Detective, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://shapeshiftingdetective.com. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Captain Calm (talk) 13:51, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Shapeshifting Detective (2)


A tag has been placed on Draft:The Shapeshifting Detective (2), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://shapeshiftingdetective.com. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Captain Calm (talk) 13:53, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- ferret (talk) 14:33, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Shrek the Third
Hi, when you made your recent edit to the article, I'd noticed there was already the cast member in the list so you inserted an exact duplicate of the cast and character. I have removed the duplicate entry so readers are not confused as to why there were two entries there. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 12:08, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Genre edits to Shrek films
I noticed you inserted "fantasy" as a genre at some Shrek articles, such as in this edit. Fantasy is not listed by any of the three online film databases that Wikipedia trusts for the first Shrek film. Please review See Talk:Shrek (franchise). --GoneIn60 (talk) 13:05, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

The Lion King
Hello, I wanted you to know that I changed one detail concerning one minor character that briefly speaks to Zazu in The Lion King. For years, it was always listed as a gopher, but an August 1993 script draft (on page 14) written by the film's screenwriters states it's a mole. PrinceArchelaus (talk) 06:44, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frozen II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marc Smith.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Lion King (2019 film) into The Lion King. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 13:03, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)