User talk:Gcanyon

Welcome to the Wikipedia
Here are some links I find useful


 * Policy Library
 * Cite your sources
 * Verifiability
 * Wikiquette
 * Conflict resolution
 * Brilliant prose
 * Neutral point of view
 * Pages needing attention
 * Peer review
 * Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
 * Village pump
 * Boilerplate text

Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~.

Cheers, Sam [Spade] 07:54, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)

ITIL
Hi Geoff,

I see the changes you are making on the ITIL page. Thanks, the changes you've made are great. There's really a lot to do, and I'm finding it a little overwhelming. :-)

Have you seen the proposal for changes that I put on the discussion page? I'd appreciate your reactions/input.

DanielVonEhren 20:49, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Moved from DanielVonEhren's talk page.


 * Not sure what the etiquette is when adding messages back and forth. In any case, thanks for the kind words on my talk page. I find ITIL about as clear as the tax code. The article does a reasonable job at an introduction, I think. I read the discussion page and your plan to split the page into sub-pages. One thing I haven't read in my wanderings around wikipedia is a discussion of depth. In other words, how much detail is necessary in an article on ITIL? I'm not saying there's too much now, or that your plan to split into separate pages is too much either. I just think that there's a bit of a slippery slope between where the article is now and the (however many) books that describe ITIL completely. We need a clear sense of where "enough detail" is.


 * Other than that I think we're in exactly the same boat. I can help clarify and organize, but I'm not an authority. I need to become more knowledgeable, and helping with the wiki page seems like a reasonable way to get there.


 * Geoff Canyon 22:38, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Not sure what the etiquette is... I asked the same question early on (in fact, I think I even used the word etiquette). The answer I got, boiled down, was "whatever". I like these virtual conversations to happen in one place rather than two, for obvious reasons. I moved your response over to your talk page for no compelling reason; feel free to move it back to mine or wherever (it's on my watchlist, so I'll notice). eMail is possible, but not everybody turns it on (mine in enabled). Obviously I put notes of direct importance to the article on the article's discussion page.

...as clear as the tax code. Oh, yeah. Gotta do my taxes.

...a discussion of depth. Here's my take. One of the things I like about the Wikipedia is the sublime irrelevance of so much of the material. In Britannica, you'll never find an analysis of the personality of a video game character; or a list of Japanese porno actresses; or the Guinness Book of World Records entry for longest sushi ever. This texture is one of the things I like. I infer from your words that you believe that a Wiki article is supposed to be a coherent, well-formed essay; I think that it's whatever someone wants to take the trouble to put in. Too much detail? I don't think I understand the concept. Of course, it still must be managed, or at least channeled. To me, this points to splitting up.

I lean toward splitting things up once they get past five or ten pages (certainly an arbitrary number). There are (or maybe: were) some size limitation, and obviously bigger has technical problems (the diffs, loading time for slower connections, and so forth), but I think of it in a more conceptual way. It is pretty easy in this case. My argument is: OGC split it up, and so should we. But if I do in fact bother to make the split and you don't like it, you can always revert. And then we can have an edit war, and call each other rude names. It will be great fun. :-)

...helping with the wiki page seems like a reasonable way to get there. Isn't the Wiki a fabulous opportunity to learn new things? I absolutely love it.

DanielVonEhren 01:53, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of One Hand Up


The article One Hand Up has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No reliable sources that demonstrate any notability; no verifiability; no assertion that anyone plays this game except the article's creator; WP:MADEUP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Accounting4Taste: talk 18:20, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Jessie Miller
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567624936 your edit] to Crash Davis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:00, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * http://philadelphiaathletics.org/history/crashdavis.htm The Legend of the Real Crash Davis Philadelphia Athletics, via Internet Archive]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albert Burns (motorcyclist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toledo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Myah Marie for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Myah Marie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Myah Marie & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hirolovesswords (talk) 21:10, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Community Health Metrics Kit consultation
The Community Health Metrics Kit is a new project to measure more aspects of our communities. If you are interested in metrics, statistics, and measurement of editing and contributing, please join us on Meta to discuss how and what the new project should measure! Please share this with anyone else you think may be interested in this work. This message is also available in other languages. For the Community health initiative, Cheers, SPoore (WMF), Trust &#38; Safety, Community health initiative (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Sight & Sound Greatest Films of All Time 2022


A tag has been placed on The Sight & Sound Greatest Films of All Time 2022 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.bfi.org.uk/sight-and-sound/greatest-films-all-time and See WP:TOP100. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 09:45, 2 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Fram, I had a discussion with Primefac about the deletion. Based on that Primefac restored the page without the list, and I added just the top 10 for each list. If you think that still violates Copyright in lists let me know and I'll happily work to source/revise/edit to achieve compliance. Geoff Canyon (talk) 19:21, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)