User talk:Gccuconati

Welcome!
Hello, Gccuconati, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sean Whalen, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sheldybett (talk) 07:30, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Sean Whalen


A tag has been placed on Sean Whalen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sheldybett (talk) 07:30, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Pacifier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Key ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Pacifier check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Pacifier?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Isle of Dogs (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plane ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Isle_of_Dogs_%28film%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Isle_of_Dogs_%28film%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Fantastic Mr. Fox (film), you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 04:57, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Babe (film) plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 02:10, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Buck Ford moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Buck Ford, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:03, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Buck Ford (February 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Boothsift was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Buck Ford and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Buck Ford, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Buck_Ford Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Boothsift&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Buck_Ford reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

It's  Boothsift  04:47, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Buck Ford (February 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gene93k were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Buck Ford and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Buck Ford, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Buck_Ford Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gene93k&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Buck_Ford reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Buck Ford (March 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Buck Ford and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Buck Ford, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Buck_Ford Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Buck_Ford reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bad Santa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fetish ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Bad_Santa check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Bad_Santa?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Emperor's New Groove, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flask ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Emperor%27s_New_Groove check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Emperor%27s_New_Groove?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Dog's Way Home, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Animal control ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/A_Dog%27s_Way_Home check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/A_Dog%27s_Way_Home?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Dog's Way Home, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Animal control ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/A_Dog%27s_Way_Home check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/A_Dog%27s_Way_Home?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bad Santa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hindustani ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Bad_Santa check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Bad_Santa?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Please explain your edits
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks!NEDOCHAN (talk) 14:58, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Goodnight Moon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lauren Hill ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Goodnight_Moon check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Goodnight_Moon?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:36, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Borat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Borat check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Borat?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:22, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 9
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * 10 Cloverfield Lane ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/10_Cloverfield_Lane check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/10_Cloverfield_Lane?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Lake Charles
 * Tenacious D in The Pick of Destiny ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Tenacious_D_in_The_Pick_of_Destiny check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Tenacious_D_in_The_Pick_of_Destiny?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Hallucinogenic mushroom

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:06, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 10 Cloverfield Lane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lake Charles ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/10_Cloverfield_Lane check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/10_Cloverfield_Lane?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Good Vibrations (Marky Mark and the Funky Bunch song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please also see WP:IPCV. DonIago (talk) 16:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Plymouth Meeting Mall, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:01, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Big Hero 6 (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Showcase ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Big_Hero_6_%28film%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Big_Hero_6_%28film%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:17, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Teacher, Teacher (Rockpile song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terry Williams ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Teacher%2C_Teacher_%28Rockpile_song%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Teacher%2C_Teacher_%28Rockpile_song%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:47, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Borat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Borat check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Borat?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Liar Liar
Hi. Please note per WP:FILMPLOT that plots are a maximum of 700 words. Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 20:30, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Please do not add excess details per plot using puffery language and not adhering to neutral point of view as you did at Liar Liar. I once again remind you that plots are not to be more than 700 words. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 02:54, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Liar Liar plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vaseline</b><b style="color:lightgrey">eeeeeee</b>★★★ 03:05, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at Borat. You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. <b style="color:black">Vaseline</b><b style="color:lightgrey">eeeeeee</b>★★★ 16:46, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. <b style="color:black">Vaseline</b><b style="color:lightgrey">eeeeeee</b>★★★ 16:47, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Balto
In this edit the link you provided does not work. Contributor19 (talk) 23:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)


 * This reference has nothing to do with the production of the film. I put it in the historical differences section because that is where it belongs. Contributor19 (talk) 01:23, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * He won’t respond. I’m thinking about reporting his disruptive behaviour on film plot sections for blatant disregard for filmplot policy and lack of communication. <b style="color:black">Vaseline</b><b style="color:lightgrey">eeeeeee</b>★★★ 04:51, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry I haven't responded. I didn't know I was supposed to respond. I don't mean to be disruptive. I'm not deliberately ignoring the policy, I just don't understand that there's a policy. Please forgive me. Gccuconati 10:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the response. Just please don't excessively go over the word limit of 700 words per WP:FILMPLOT - that is a policy. There are a select few films that have complex plots that may need to go over 700 words, but there is still no reason to have 900, 1000 word plot summaries for the average film - that is excessive. <b style="color:black">Vaseline</b><b style="color:lightgrey">eeeeeee</b>★★★ 14:25, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Got it. Next time I edit a film plot, I'll use a word count to make absolutely sure that it does not exceed 700 words before submitting it. I've learned my lesson. Thank you very much for informing me. Gccuconati 14:35, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Why do you keep removing the "needs additional citations" tag from the production section? Also, I don't think that tv tropes is a reliable source, because it is a fan wiki; Potentially_unreliable_sources. Contributor19 (talk) 06:05, 10 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Please respond. Contributor19 (talk) 20:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Since Gccuconati has refused to respond to my question here (he has made 11 edits elsewhere on Wikipedia since I asked him the question, including 6 after I pinged him), I wanted your thoughts on whether tv tropes is a reliable source or not. Contributor19 (talk) 19:11, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Nope - see Reliable sources/Perennial sources. I still think Gccuconati's behaviour here (using unreliable sources, constantly going against policy, and failing to reply) is problematic. <b style="color:black">Vaseline</b><b style="color:lightgrey">eeeeeee</b>★★★ 19:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm very sorry for not responding. I've just forgotten to check my messages. I didn't know that you don't consider TV Tropes a reliable source. And the reason I keep removing the tag is that I don't know how many sources a section should have. Please forgive me. Perhaps I have a lot to learn. Gccuconati (talk) 19:23, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Personally, I don't think the section needs a ref banner as a couple embedded citation needed tags will probably do the trick, but these things should be discussed on the talk page before mass reverts per WP:BRD. But yes, TV Tropes is considered unreliable, and that page I linked above is very helpful to determine what Wikipedia's stance on various sources are. <b style="color:black">Vaseline</b><b style="color:lightgrey">eeeeeee</b>★★★ 20:44, 12 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for your input. I had suspected that it was not a reliable source but I wanted to be sure. And thank you Gccuconati for responding. Contributor19 (talk) 20:44, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * You're very welcome. I've checked that list, and now I know that IMDB and TV Tropes are not reliable, according to the list. And it says that Google Maps may occasionally be unreliable, but Google Books is nowhere on the list. How do I know whether it's reliable if it's not on the list? Gccuconati (talk) 21:01, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Google Books is not on the list because there are thousands of books on it. You can use books on Google Books as sources as long as they are not WP:Self-published. <b style="color:black">Vaseline</b><b style="color:lightgrey">eeeeeee</b>★★★ 22:48, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * So before I cite a book from Google Books, does that mean I need to check to make sure that in the "Publisher" section, it doesn't say the same as the "Author" section? (talk) 24:45, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * It should be published by a reputable printing house. <b style="color:black">Vaseline</b><b style="color:lightgrey">eeeeeee</b>★★★ 03:13, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * So like a very well-known printing house? (talk) 09:45, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I noticed that the 1995 edition of The Hollywood Reporter is on Google Books. The list states that it's a reliable source. Would I be allowed to cite sources from that? (talk) 15:58, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Of course, just don't WP:Synthesize your own info from it. <b style="color:black">Vaseline</b><b style="color:lightgrey">eeeeeee</b>★★★ 20:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * And Animation Source.org isn't on the list either, and it's cited twice. Is it a reliable source? (talk) 16:03, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I'd probably say no, but if you ever have a question whether a source is reliable or not, you could always ask the 'experts' at Reliable sources/Noticeboard. <b style="color:black">Vaseline</b><b style="color:lightgrey">eeeeeee</b>★★★ 20:13, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * How do I ask them? (talk) 20:23, 20 May 2020 (UTC)


 * It should be noted that one of the sources from Animation Source.org used on the page is an interview with the director of Balto. In which case I would think that it would be reliable.Contributor19 (talk) 21:14, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Curious George (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glendale ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Curious_George_%28film%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Curious_George_%28film%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:18, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Glendale Federal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Universal City ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Glendale_Federal check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Glendale_Federal?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:02, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited What Did You Expect from The Vaccines?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LP ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/What_Did_You_Expect_from_The_Vaccines%3F check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/What_Did_You_Expect_from_The_Vaccines%3F?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Recent Balto edit, and some advice
When another editor undoes one of your edits, you will receive a notice of it. On the Balto page I undid this edit that you made (as you can see, I left an edit summary stating my reason why.) Two days later, you put it back, and I undid it again here. When you seen that one of your additions has been undone, don't just put it back. Try checking your notices or check the article's edit history. It was likely undone for a reason. (In this case, I feel that it is excessive and unnecessary to include a character's eye color on the character list.) You need to communicate with others.

And please leave an edit summary when you make edits on articles. In late June 2019, an editor left this message on your talk page telling you to "Please explain your edits". You seemingly ignored it, because you have continued to not leave edit summaries.

In a recent discussion, you said "I've just forgotten to check my messages." With all due respect, you cannot afford to let that happen. You need to read all of your messages and notices as soon as you see that you have received them, because it is usually something important that needs your attention. If you continue to not check your messages and notices, then editors will assume that you are deliberately ignoring them. Thanks. Contributor19 (talk) 08:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I didn't ignore it. I just didn't notice. I try to pay attention, but the notices haven't been immediately coming up. Please forgive me. I just haven't heard of these policies until now. (talk) 09:33, 25 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. :) Thank you for the response. Also, if you ever feel strongly that something in an article should remain, you can always start a discussion on the article's talk page. Contributor19 (talk) 19:27, 25 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Certainly. I'll remember that now. Gccuconati (talk) 19:30, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Disaster Artist (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Disaster_Artist_%28film%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Disaster_Artist_%28film%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Disaster Artist (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dalmatian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jonas Brothers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page More Than a Woman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Breakout (Miley Cyrus song). Binksternet (talk) 05:40, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm very sorry. That was not deliberate. I made a mistake, based on the song's personnel. I would have left the information intact if I had known for sure that the information was incorrect. I was not attempting to vandalize Wikipedia. I do not mean any harm. Gccuconati (talk) 05:45, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Amblin Entertainment
I believe the 1981 founding date was inaccurate. 1970 is the most accurate founding date of Amblin Entertainment. --172.127.114.25 (talk) 14:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I wasn't the one who wrote the inaccurate founding date for Amblin Entertainment. In fact, I have never bothered with the founding date of that company. Futhermore, I have not edited Wikipedia in over a month. Gccuconati (talk) 16:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * AKR619 and a dead anonymous user are the ones who wrote with the wrong foundation date 12 years ago (on July 20, 2008 and July 22, 2008). I go to corporationwiki.com, search "Amblin" and go click to it. It turns out 1970 is a good founding year. That's two years after the short was made. --2600:1700:4300:2C8F:89EA:72E4:97DB:14B5 (talk) 19:22, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Well agree, it turns out that the 1981 founding date is now inaccurate. 1970 is the true founding year for Amblin Entertainment. --2600:1700:4300:2C8F:B570:E32D:9077:C393 (talk) 00:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, I will revert it with some changes. --2600:1700:4300:2C8F:B570:E32D:9077:C393 (talk) 00:16, 24 September 2020 (UTC)