User talk:Gdo01/Archive/Archive 02

Signpost updated for January 22nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

User_talk:Toonarific
Just so you know, I reverted your addition, because it was duplicate to the one that I had already placed there. No offense, at all. :) Cbrown1023 02:12, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Aqua teen movie
Thank you for taking the middle ground, and not attempting to delete the reference, even though you disagreed with it. That is great manners, and shows you to be a great Wikipedian. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheGreenFaerae (talk • contribs) 00:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC).

Re:Parakeet/Cockatiel
Thanks for clearing that up. It was a mistake by me, sorry. Comparing pictures from my manga and the article picures, it's indeed a cockatiel. Thanks again, cheers! ♥ Tohru Honda13  ♥ 22:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Extremely Sorry
I just noticed that the vandalism was caused by an IP and added a vandal warning to it's talk page. Please accept my sincere apologies (I screwed up reading which line the vandalism occured on in the history) and let me know how (if possible I can undo those comments). I will also place this notice on the Borat talk page.

Once again, truly sorry about that.

Qwertyca 00:57, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the understanding Gdo01 - I have added an apology and clarification to the Borat talk page as well. Qwertyca 01:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

This user has edited the Star Wars Episode 1 page to remove all useful information and replace it with prophanity. This user should be banned.

ATHF/Images
I readded my image, below yours....so there are two. My image is of one that had been there for some two weeks. I think they both tell the story (I just write long explanations). - SVRTVDude 03:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Episode 1
Sorry about that, I missed some things - Myanw 20:55, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

You are the one in danger of violating WP:3RR
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. Deleting has to be discussed. Lear 21 00:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Anyone who looks through European Union's history page can see that I've only reverted twice. I could warn you for using the wrong template. Gdo01 00:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Barack Obama
Fyi, and thanks for the support. --HailFire 16:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Reiko Aylesworth Edit
Why did you remove the trivia from the page on Reiko Aylesworth? It is clearly not vandalism and a true statement that can be cited from documented sources. --Coexerj145 19:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Hizbollah
Is it your view is that Hizbollah is NOT a terrorist organization? That the Buenos Aires slaughter was perhaps a "demonstration" by perhaps "militants"? Or perhaps the kidnap of American journalists was a "protest" by "activists"? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Scott Adler (talk • contribs) 02:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC).

Oil
So I guess you blame the victims, eh? The Europeans are growing tired of French whoring. http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=worldNews&storyID=2007-02-02T195015Z_01_L02233849_RTRUKOC_0_US-FRANCE-HEZBOLLAH.xml&WTmodLoc=IntNewsHome_C2_worldNews-3 Scott Adler 07:37, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Apology
Thank you, wonderful citizen of "Terra", for deleting my Carlos Mencia rant. Es muy apotheostico! Lo siento. I was out of line and I apologize for my actions. It was rash, ill-advised and ultimately just a bad judgment call on my part. When a person misuses wikipedia like I did, they should always have a CVU guy like you to make things right. 153.106.4.95 18:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:02, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Pimp
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Boris Allen 17:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * First of all that should have a subst tag before the warning. Second, don't welcome me to Wikipedia, I've been a consistent editor for over a year with nearly 7000 edits. Third, only templates are allowed to be in article pages not custom tags. Gdo01 17:49, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, apologies for not adding the tag properly, and for the welcome line included, but ther point is you removed content from the page. Anyway, the only reason I'm in danger of violating the 3rr is because you vandals keep reverting my reverts! This is totally unacceptable. What do you have against my promoting the addition of my pimp image to the article? It is a highly appropriate image I created solely for this purpose, yet you all appear to want to gang up on me to ensure it is not added. Why?--Boris Allen 17:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 12th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:08, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Jamieson Price and Mark Worden
The truth is I've listened over and over to Chad's English performance and I have real trouble believing it's Price and I mean he's pretty close to Chad's voice but I honestly do not believe it is Jamieson Price.--Jack Cox 05:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

False Accusation
You said I added nonsense to the page on Cholera. The first time I visited that page was AFTER you sent me that message. Either someone's been hacking my computer, or you got the wrong IP address. What gives???
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

VANDALISM ACCUSATION
you sent me a message that i was commiting vandalism....please varify your accusation...i dont recall making ANY recent changes to articles....please tell me what i have vandalized.....please contact........thanx —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.199.142.78 (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Noriega
Wikipedia in Spanish has sources documenting Noriega was found innocent of drug trafficking, and imprisoned as war prisoner (of the imperial army of the USA). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.91.136.129 (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Reba
Can I ask why you have reverted my edit on page Reba? There was no reason for that edit to be removed as that word describes Reba —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.31.100.211 (talk • contribs).

Thank you Gdo01 - —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.31.100.211 (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about the Colbert thing
My apologies. I just love Colbert. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rytagg (talk • contribs).

Hi I didn't do it. when i clicked toefl save changes it said the article conflicted with something else and half the content disappered. So I didn't do it. i just added a external link to the toefl section —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.92.179.13 (talk • contribs).

the saint:

no shit or joking thats is the true story about why the saint choose a volvo p1800 read more here: http://www.btinternet.com/~therogermooreyears/Volvop1800.htm so be open minded you might even learn something from us swedes ( but i doubt it..)... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.231.8.33 (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Edit was not vandalism.
It was my belief that articles were supposed to be politically neutral. Claiming that Bush was "against civil liberties" is certainly not neutral. Nor is it a fact or piece of truthful information in any way. The worst part of all is the claim is not made in the context of someone’s beliefs, it is stated as fact. If even it were to read "some people believed..." or something along those lines. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.146.190.92 (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Bush article
I would say that voting against one bill simply because it is named the "Civil Rights" bill does not mean that you are "against civil rights". That statement is a broad generalization which I'm sure Bush himself would disagree with. I fail to see why the prayer in schools would have to go, it is indeed fact that he supported prayer in schools, he has said so himself so that is very clear.

To summarize I believe the article should AT THE LEAST be changed to mention that he voted against the civil rights bill rather than a generalization that makes it appear as if he was against ALL civil rights. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.146.190.92 (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Gabriel
Hello:)

I had recently edited parts of Wikepedia on Gabriel, and you said it was vandalism. One of the edits I had made was on the Occult understanding of Gabriel. I put the Color "Purple" as Gabriel's color in addition to blue,and his rulership over the Kabbalistic Sephira of Yesod. All these attributions that I added are accurate. So your reversions are WRONG. Your email message to me accusing me of being a Vandal was very RUDE to say the least. I am a Kabbalist/Occultist and I have worked with Gabriel before. To check my attributions, read Dion Fortune's "The Mystical Qabala". In the future, do your research before accusing others of Vandalism. Also remember that anyone can edit Wikepedia, if it is a valid edit. So stop being a member of the Thought-Police. And please try NOT to be rude in the future, as you will receive the same treatment.

Blessings, --A Very pissed-off Kabbalist —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.126.223.29 (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Polygariffic!
Do you have a problem with Polygamy? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.135.161.74 (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Peter Kay article
How did that happen, I reverted the article as it had been vandalised and your are the person listed in History as editing it?

Strange, unless we both did the rv at the same time perhaps? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pjb007 (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

World Wide fund thing
Hey man, I see you sent me an PM, I know I'm vandilising, but, If you got the the Urban Dictionary site, some ppl are bashing there about WWF. Just Type WWF in the box, and you'll see what I mean --from User:Dekabreak

Edit: Sorry, my apologies, I just like wrestling, don't want to be mean or so. I just hate it when WWE changed. So sorry won't happen. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dekabreak (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Stephen Colbert

 * Colbert first introduced the Called Out board on 8/14/2006, by placing Jo h n Steward on it to force an appology to Geraldo.

This is verifiable factual information. Look it up on Comedy Central or watch his show and you might know. This is a trivia fact not vandalism. Also by placing the underline on the H in Jo h n that is notating that it is mispelled. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 132.178.204.178 (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Colbert Bridge Incident
Hi Gd001, beside appreciating your heroic efforts making Wikipedia a better place, please consider that FACTS are not to be mixed with vandalism. Fact is that Colbert named a national hero of a foreign nation as "asshole" in his show (youtube it if you doubt) and affected members of a nation could hardly tolerate this. Maybe it is fun for Americans but not for Hungarians. The bridge name voting story shall contain this FACT too, not only the poll results. If a comedian makes fun of something, (s(he shall take all the responsibility as well. Best would be OMIT the whole name voting issue from the personal part because it is insignificant for Colbert's life but deeply offensing for national emotions of a EU country.

Also note that there are repeated tips and urges for voting, cheating or hacking the official vote page. Does it match Wikipedia rules? Don't think so.


 * Dear Gdo, still presuming your measures are for the overall benefit of the Wiki community and not merely on behalf of Colbert himself, let me point out that your message remarks are somewhat odd. Hope you do not mind.


 * First of all, Colbert's lack of knowledge is his very own problem and being stupid is seldom an excuse -- this is not a case. FACT it is that according to Hungarian regulation, things can be named after only dead people. If one knew it, never would start a name voting campaign for himself. Colbert started anyway, thus proofing he knows very little about Hungary. Period. He need not to -- but wise persons (even who plays stupid characters) gather information first, especially when encouraging over-the-internet service abusal. All the big voting campaign was in vain -- since Colbert is a living showman, all votes on him will be officially discarded. Lack of information can backfire.


 * You also defended Colbert('s character) as being stupid enough to make fun of Asian language. Another point of cultural differences: as far as I personally (being a European and a Hungarian adult) know, these jokes are regarded rather un-PC and offensive. Making dumb jokes about Asians (and not being criticized for it) is hardly an excuse. One who thinks this way (and makes/enjoys jokes such this) should take some lessons on history and tolerance. Maybe this should help to change the stereotypically senseless American approach of the outside world and to decrease cultural and other conflicts. EU countries are not 3rd world, "Asia" is not the same reference as Europe but even they/it were/was, never would be worth such behavior.


 * You also claimed that "Colbert (...) plays a character (...) bigoted and stupid, comments like the ones he made about Zrínyi Miklós are expected and purely satirical and not the views of the real Stephen Colbert." No problem, this is okay -- if one knows Colbert and his show. But he is well unknown over here, and again, think-first method could prevent him being identified with his character. Now chances are that Stephen Colbert's name get known in Hungary as "the person who named Zrinyi an asshole". Well paved way for a future local introduction for the man and his show, huh?


 * You also think you can decide whether the remarks such "Hungarian viewers typically found Stephen's remark about Zrinyi...senseless and repelling" are correctly based. You are wrong: calling any national historical hero an "asshole" IS offensive and repelling BY ITSELF, even if it was said by another angry undead historical opponent :) or an angry history expert which are again not the case. It was a primitive offense, nothing more, and as such it can be criticized without any further support. If you like, you may start any polling etc to prove that it was NOT offensive and repelling -- that is your free choice. To become civil is a good aim but being PC and practicing tolerance cannot be avoided if you want to reach it. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.56.225.23 (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

IP address discussion page
I was just wondering y a discussion page for my IP address was created. i have a login already, i just never use it cuz i'm too lazy to log in. i don't care, i just think it's a waste of resources for me to have two discussion pages. the preceding unsigned comment was left by 147.26.232.92
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

In regards to the Bleach media change
I am actually 67.49.159.223 but I'm under my username which I forgot to sign in. Anyway, thanks for inserting the link to Beat Crusaders on the Bleach media page, when the bot reverted it back. I knew it was correct but I didn't know why the bot did that. Anyway, thanks a bunch and thanks for doing it so fast.

--DigitalKaede a.k.a 67.49.159.223
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

R&B Singer Mya was born in 1979 and her 5th album Control Freak will be out in 2007
the only website that says that she was born in 1978 is imdb, which was a type-o and they take months to make changes (i've sent in a request). her official website ( http://www.myamya.com/ ; temporarily down) says it's 1979.

Control Freak will come out in 2007 (oficial mya website).

Please quit changing it... yesterday Control Freak wasn't listed and her birth year was 1981. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.71.97.206 (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

hmm that a put down.
very sad. shall have to block this muck. gb —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.248.232.60 (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Imdb
Im not vandAlising anything im adding trivia that is truthful and accurate I appologise for going a BIT over the top though. I feel that I have the right to add something that is truthful I dont understand why there is a problem here when there is no problem over at imdb with that trivia .the same info is over at imdb with NO PROBLEMS.i would like to also ask why some unknown person in a small time band has their own wikipedia page??? that is definalty unfair and not right.I feel it should be taken down. just becuase of assocaition she is up there.

Can I add this trivia? which is not disrespctful its polite and states the truth.

Despite playing a large drum in the "Gogol Bordello" stage shows, Racine does not do the primary drum work.

She credits Hutz with giving her her first (and only) dancing job, working for his band Gogol Bordello.

Was at the Cannes Film Festival 2006, despite not having a film there —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.126.124.55 (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Down the Road to Censorship
Do you work for NHTSA or MADD, or the police? Only reason I could think of for your redacting everything from the seat belt article that doesn't spout the party line on seat belts. My only plea is, Please don't let Wikipedia become yet another mouthpiece for big government. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.183.44.6 (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Colbert Report
Colbert does tell the straight up truth about whats going on in the world. Why edit that line out? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SolidSnake961 (talk • contribs)
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

piss beer
dear Mr Gdo01 i recently recieved a message referring to the 'vandalism' i did on the piss beer page. All id like to say to you sir, is that piss beer tastes like wee —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.128.150.140 (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

ANSWER
You deleted my accurate description of ANSWER as anti Israeli and anti american orginization STOP Censoring!

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by MagicKirin (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

ANSWER
The desciption I make of ANSWER is central to what they are and what they represent. I notice all of the users who object to this edit are on the liberal end of the political spectrum

I hope it it is not political correctness which is spuring on your revisions and warnings —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MagicKirin (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Sun
Yeah, I left that on for like 5 seconds as a joke because I was showing my friend who was saying "I HOPE SUN DOESNT DIE." I was going to remove it. You might wanna take a break, you were all over that the second I posted it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bishusui (talk • contribs) 21:00, October 6, 2006 (EST).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Asylum
No Sporky is not my "sockpuppet" and there is NO "allowed" Information at this time availiable on the Asylum at this time the guy who keeps posting it is a former member who got mad and is breaking rules he agreed to when he first joined ....the first rule and I believe the only real rule is dont talk about the Asylum

but im sick and tired of trying to corect the leak of "illegal information" so ive givin up the witch hunt

and i hope the Info gets taken off before Gamecrazy Contacts Wikipedia about the incursion

I have mde A Edit to the Info on the Page that makes it No longer one sided against the site known as The Asylum and i hope it remains that way if it gets reverted it will be a shame for a person who posted the original info knew very little and because of the way he acted will never know any more than he does now

I have been a Member of said site for almost 2 years and have the knowledge to correct the info Properly and i will leave the info up because i will never succeed in my original intent of removing it.
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

ikkaku
well they must have changed the translation since i dled it...my version says "idiot...i told u along time ago when i taught u how to fight didn't i. that i have no intention of telling anyone besides u and yumichika that i have bankai". just remember m7 takes some liberties with the translations on their hq releases. good example is when grimmjow goes to fight ichigo the second time, m7's release has grimmjow talking a lot of trash. even saying he could cut off both arms and still beat ichigo...no other translation i've see is even close to that, including m7 initial release of the same chapter.

i really don't think that ikkaku teaching renji bankai is acurate, but i can't read japanese to confirm otherwise...so whatever, go with either since i can't really prove anything.
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

You deleted my comment
It is Chamillionaire in the passenger seat in the video of White and Nerdy. Look at two pictures side by side
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

moving pages, properly
Please be aware that copying text from one article title to another... then deleting the original... is never permissible. If half a dozen people collaborate on an article, and we fail to maintain a record of it (somewhere), it amounts to plagiarism. The speedy deletion tag should have been placed at the title with only one edit in the history, so that the all of the edits from original article can be moved to the new title. As you can see, I've merged the histories so all authors still get credit for their work. In the future, if you see anybody trying to pull a fast one, you can report it at WP:SPLICE. — freak([ talk]) 04:16, Oct. 24, 2006 (UTC)
 * 04:05, October 24, 2006 Freakofnurture (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Temptation (Cradle of Filth song)" (Deleted to make way for move.)
 * 04:05, October 24, 2006 Freakofnurture (Talk | contribs | block) moved Temptation (song) to Temptation (Cradle of Filth song)
 * 04:08, October 24, 2006 Freakofnurture (Talk | contribs | block) restored "Temptation (Cradle of Filth song)" (1 revisions restored: merging lone revision from duplicate)
 * Well, I assume that if you knew then what I've just told you, you would have realized the other user's rationale was flawed, and removed the tag. — freak([ talk]) 04:24, Oct. 24, 2006 (UTC)
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Olbermann
What did I do to commit vandalism? Did I tell the truth about Keith Olbermann, and that he's a "liberal American journalist"? If that's vandalism, then you have a hell of a lot of people doing that to conservatives. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.159.155.69 (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Obama
wasn\'t vandalism - have no idea where the slashes, etc. came from on obama page .. ?? was only trying to add \" and is a Democrat \" and all of the other gibberish showed up .. sorry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bibra (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Stephanie (Lazy Town)
You marked an edit of mine as being irrelevant. I would like you to see WIKI article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mustard_Man

The Stephanie character has gained fame in the same manner as mustard man. It is a meme with an even stronger following than the previous mentioned article.

Id like you to revert my change or rewrite it in a manner you approve of. I didnt add links to examples since some of them may be inappropriate for her normal audience.

The last line of the article "She also holds the secret recipe to a really great cake, which is "a piece of cake to bake."" is in reference to the fad that made her into an internet Meme. I argue that my edit was far more useful than the last sentence. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ciper (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Bount Clarification
"there is no english word ritz or friede or baura or nieder or geselle" is what you said, but I never said there was an English word Ritz, Friede, Baura, Nieder of Geselle. I stated that the English translation of those German words, or the translations of the closest word to those German names, would be ______.

For example, I changed "The German translation of Ritz is crack, cut or scratch..." to "The English translation of Ritz is crack, cut or scratch..." because, correct me if I'm wrong, but the German translation of a German word would still be the same word in German, but the English translation of a German word would be a word in English. If that's the case, then all the ones I've changed from "the German translation of" to "the English translation of" would be valid.

Nieder and Baura, however, might be justified in being reverted to their previous forms. I used three seperate translators and a German dictionary to get the definitions for Nieder and Bauraum (closest German word to Baura), but I couldn't see any way of linking Nieder the doll's abilities to Nieder the definition. As for Bauraum, that seemed to be more of a verb than a noun, and the only link between the doll Baura's abilities to the word Bauraum are that they are both spatial related. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HayashiKun (talk • contribs).

Hmm, was unaware of the unsigned thingy. Anyways, I agree with you that the terminology is indeed confusing. Keep up the anti-vandalism work! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HayashiKun (talk • contribs).


 * Hmm... well, the way I'm looking at it, using Ritz as an example, the word itself is already German, right? Therefore the German word Ritz, in the English language, would mean crack.  That seems more correct to me.  It's still quite confusing, but that's the way I'm looking at it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HayashiKun (talk • contribs).


 * Ritz is German for crack.. that sounds right, if if you mean it as in the German word Ritz means crack in English. Yep, that sounds right.  Good job! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HayashiKun (talk • contribs).
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

thanks
Thanks for telling me that. I was wondering what was the purpose of putting that.. thanks again and someone does seem rather popular ;) Cheers!! Songjin 8:48, December 2006 (UTC)
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Arrancar Arc
I think episode 109 is in the Arrancar Arc of Bleach because the title suggests the whole sky-breaking theme of that arc, and the previous episode suggests literally "The Last Clash" between Ichigo and the Bounts. Theres no reason to suggest it isn't in that arc.
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Arrancar Follow-up
Well it may not be part of the main Arrancar arc, but I'm pretty sure it's not a Bount arc episode.
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Arrancar Follow-up 2
Well, might as well wait and see then...I just didn't want people to be too "sad" that the Bount arc was going on for ANOTHER episode.
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Racing comment
Well you didn't have to be so rude about it.
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

ATHF Boston Scare title
Thanks, but I'm not TOO familiar with moving pages. (I feel like it'll delete itself if I try.) I just wanted to post a trial title.

But everybody really needs to agree with one.
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Bleach
Konnichi-wa, Gdo-san! I recently made a Bleach WikiProject and thought you might be interested in it. I've seen you edit some Bleach-related articles and you seem to know what you're doing, so I was just wondering if you would like to look into the project, fix it if necessary, and possibly even join. Of course, the choice is completely up to you and I'm not going to force you to join if you decline, but it would be nice to have someone like you as a member. Thank you for your time, and happy editing! // Poetic Decay  20:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Scratch that last bit. I forgot to bring it up at WikiProject Council/Proposals, so I'm doing that now. // Poetic Decay  15:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

High class vs High status
I see no evidence that the writer of the Newsweek article to which you refer interviewed Colbert. It looks like it was assembled from pieces taken from other works, and inaccurately as well. Most likely the writer or his editors simply botched the quote. "High class" is illiterate, and makes absolutely no sense in this context. Colbert is nothing if not literate. Colbert would not describe Bill O'Reilly as high-class—Bill O'Reilly woudn't even describe himself as high class. That Bill O'Reilly is not high class is a matter of fact. Quale 02:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Sign for archiving. Gdo01 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 19th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the warning
Yeah, that would most likely be User:SummerThunder again. (If it were User:Cplot he'd just be saying I was a sock of User:MONGO) Thought he'd finally gotten bored. Thanks for the warning. --tjstrf talk 00:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)


 * What he said. SummerThunder's a sore loser. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 00:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Grey davis
Gd0O1 shows great liberal bias by deleating FACTS not personal opions! eg: Grey Davis DID increase the automobile tax on the people of Calif to make up for the HUGE defiect he created,This was a major reason that he was recalled! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Flyingbryan4855 (talk • contribs) 05:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC).

Stop the censorship
Gd0O1 you show great liberal bias by deleating FACTS not personal opions! eg: Grey Davis DID increase the automobile tax on the people of Calif to make up for the HUGE defiect he created,This was a major reason that he was recalled! I thought this was the peoples free wikipedia not the liberal elitest!You threaten to block my contributions because of bias,name one thing about the Grey davis edits or Obernmanns edits that not based on fact.Bw —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Flyingbryan4855 (talk • contribs) 05:46, 24 February 2007 (UTC).

what the hell is this?
what is this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chingboi (talk • contribs) 05:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC).
 * Hmm, looks suspiciously like a question inside a dashed-border box, of all things. &mdash; SMcCandlish &#91;talk&#93; &#91;contrib&#93; ツ 10:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:17, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Godwin's law revert
"rv not notable" - Right on. &mdash; SMcCandlish &#91;talk&#93; &#91;contrib&#93; ツ 10:06, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

company_type, department stores
In response to your reversions on the infobox company templates of Marshall Fields, etc. I believe the  parameter is supposed to distinguish whether a company is publicly held, privately held, whatever...not what category of store it is (although this isn't widely accepted on articles about retailers). Regards, Tuxide 20:32, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Scanlation images
While I agree with your reversion of two recent image additions for other reasons, (the first addition was to Rukia's page and the second to Gin's), I don't think the reasoning you gave in the edit summaries is necessarily solid. It is no more illegal to use a scanlated/subbed image than it is to use a RAW since both are taken from pirated versions of the manga. (But covered under fair use law to whatever extent the wikilawyers have decided this week.) If you are really concerned about the text on the images it's not that much work to remove it anyway. --tjstrf talk 03:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

RfA nomination
 Nishkid64 would like to nominate you to be an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Nishkid64 to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Requests for adminship/. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.
 * I like the work you do (especially the AIV reports) and some of the tougher RC patrol (not the easy reverts), and I think you have a good understanding of policy and have done a good deal of article participation. I hope you accept my nomination. I have a great eye for spotting future admins. =)  Nish kid 64  22:32, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * By the way, I will make the page if you accept.  Nish kid 64  22:32, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, sure thing. I'll contact you again on March 12. I am confidence that you will succeed easily. I have another RfA candidate,, who basically does the same type of work you do (RC patrol, AIV, some article, etc.) and he's doing quite nicely (1 oppose, nearly 40 supports).  Nish kid 64  23:57, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Edit5 master
I just indef-blocked. Sorry for the excessively long wait. I'm going to delete the crap from the history of The 1/2 Hour News Hour. Regards, alphachimp  06:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

House
No, I am not ok with it. It was but is no longer referred to with the ,M.D. It is absurd that people keep claiming it is. If they want to start messing around with it again then I will do what I have to to ensure that it reflects reality. Have a nice day. Billywhack 03:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * P.S:One more revert and you get reported. Billywhack 03:18, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Maybe you're referring to the 4 revert rule? I am referring to the 3 revert rule. Billywhack 03:24, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * LOL. Read what you wrote. See that it makes no sense. Also see that you're trying to link to something that doesn't exist. Then go down to the local hardware store and see if you can buy a clue. Let's test out your theory. Billywhack 03:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

I was gonna report you but I'm hungover and lazy. Feel free to report yourself. Billywhack 03:53, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * OK. Now you really are just trying to be annoying and keeping a useless edit war going. 1 more time and I will report you. I am at work so I got nothing but time. Billywhack 03:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I'll let you in on a secret: The CN tag is useless. Technically, everything on the damn cite needs that because apparently, the rules state that you can't add things that are plainly obvious or are accepted as fact without a "reliable source" which really means a famous reviewer or a book about the subject. i'm surprised they don't go after people for writing stuff about themselves on their user pages. Billywhack 04:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * You did violate the rules and should be punished with a 24hr boot. I'm actually trying to turn over a new leaf but you're being ridiculous is started to grate on my frayed nerves. Billywhack 04:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * As I said earlier, I have not violated 3rr. Here are my reverts and then I proceeded to add the cn tag twice. Those are two separate issues. Gdo01 04:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey... I know you're being more civil and mostly more reasonable than Billywhack, but you have to follow the 3RR too. Reverting exactly 3 times and then stopping isn't really OK either. One of the other people who watches the article will revert if it's reasonable; you don't need to turn this into a conflict between two people. Know what I'm saying? Respectfully --Galaxiaad 04:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

"Daniel"
Please note my response at Daniel Chiswick's user talk. If you see him doing it again, please tell me. Cheers,  Daniel Bryant  08:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Will do. He seems to have stopped editting, though. Gdo01 08:15, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Indeed he has. Well, thanks anyways. Cheers,  Daniel Bryant  10:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Figures at Thermopylae
I'd like to say that 2K-2M reveals an average range. The minima of 60,000 (unsourced) and maxima of 5,000,000 (Herodotus) do not meet consensus. Miskin 10:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

The article has faced a lot of POV-pushing and vandalism from Iranian nationalists who generally refuse to accept the consensus of western scholarship. Now with the upcoming 300 film it's gonna be hectic. Miskin 10:17, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Alfredosolis
Blocked the sock and deleted the "logo" he uploaded. I didn't delete the WikiProject because it's disputable whether it's a "contribution from a banned user" under WP:CSD and also because it might be usable. If someone wants to clean up the WikiProject page (I know nothing about Celebrity Deathmatch itself) they can do so. Awyong J. M. Salleh 11:44, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

told ya

Signpost updated for March 12th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

RfA nomination
Okay, still looks like you're not back, so just leave me a note on my user talk page, and I'll make the RfA page upon your return.  Nish kid 64  16:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Accused me of changing something in an article when I didn't. User seems like a douchebag. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.31.74.80 (talk • contribs).
 * You can clearly see that the IP did vandalize before, its not my fault that an innocent user gets the warning. Gdo01 05:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

What vandalism and nonsense?
Hello, I made an edit to the cricket world cup 2007 and saw that there was a message, written by you. Now I agree that vandalism is bad, however, I didn't edit the University of Central Lancashire page (never even knew such a page existed til the message). However it is likely that since anon users are assigned regional numbers that change frequently then whoever actually vandalized the page now has a different user assigned number (probably 72.27.....something). It may be best to leave a general warning of the discussion page of the article.72.27.11.154 02:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 13:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:55, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for helping me out with formatting on the University of Florida page. S. Stallings 20:52, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. Gdo01 20:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

72.17.134.4's vandalism to Keith Olbermann
Thanks for reverting this fellow's continued damage to the article. Obviously, he (or she) is not happy with the "Allegations of bias" section, and feels it is his job to make it the most important part of the article. At this point, I think he needs a stiff warning about his actions. He has crossed the line into vandalism. Thanks ---Charles 17:38, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Global warming uncited edits
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --Tjsynkral 19:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Facebook
I've started a threat on the talk page. If you could provide a source other than another Wikipedia page for the claim that the site is named after paper facebooks, that would be most appreciated. Savidan 21:27, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for removing the trolling on my talk page. :) TwoOars ( T 07:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. Gdo01 07:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Carlos M
Apologies, I din't know that wasn't actually his name, or I would have tagged it straight out. Thanks for pointing that out, cheers! xC | ☎  20:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Virginia tech shootings
Thank you for fixing open refs, and for your keen eye in spotting them. I'm afraid those were my fault. I've been fighting duplicates for dozens of edits now, and I'm getting exhausted. Sorry. --Kizor 20:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yea I also don't know how long I'm going to keep this up. Gdo01 20:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry. My intention was not to revert your edit but instead the vandalism. DB did not pick up the edit conflict.--I already forgot 21:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

I did post it in our WikiProject. Thank you for the suggestion. Mark Vaoverland 02:17, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I meant only in the WikiProject. Gdo01 02:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)


 * OK, I removed everything as you obviously think should be done from that talk page, except a revised pertinent comment about a possible historical context consideration. Use my talk page if you wish to communicate further. I am admitting I am too emotional right now to do a good job editing on this one, so i will stand aside. Mark Vaoverland 02:46, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

E.U. GDP (nominal)
I highly doubt it is that much because with it's growth rate it is impossible for it to grow that much in one year. I think sources other than the IMF and just finding the highest possible number and just listing it would be much better. User:Daniel_Chiswick 16 April, 2007.
 * So your doubt is supposed to make this citation invalid? The other IMF number in the other table is actually a year old so thats likely another reason why it is lower. Gdo01 04:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

wikilinks for dates
Yes, I am aware of that, as far as link style is concerned. But it also says this, which is what I am following, and why I linked the date reference to 2007 in television. That makes perfect sense to me, as it gives the reader more information and context within which to evaluate the article. There's nothing in a link to January 14 that illuminates the article - what possible relevance does it have?

''There is consensus among editors that bare month and day names should not be linked unless there is a specific reason that the link will help the reader to understand the article. There is less agreement about links to years. Some editors believe that links to years are generally useful to establish context for the article. Others believe that links to years are rarely useful to the reader and reduce the readability of the text. Another possibility is to link to a more specific article about that year, for example 2006, although some people find this unintuitive because the link leads to an unexpected destination.'' Tvoz | talk 20:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * That only applies if there is no year if you only have a month and day or if you don't have a month and date but do have a year. If you have all 3 they should be linked. Gdo01 20:17, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, it's not clear to me that this is a requirement - I see that if a date is linked it needs to be done in that way because of date preference, but there also is the issue of context which I think is ambiguous on this. I think WP:COMMON_SENSE is what we should follow on this little point. Again, I'm not talking about the infobox although I think that's just silly.  I;m talking about the article text. Tvoz | talk 20:35, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well article text should not need years since its likely mostly 2007. I'm okay with those being delinked but the infobox is in context of previous seasons so it needs the date and year formatted that way. Gdo01 20:37, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * OK - no prob. Maybe someone will explain  to me what it accomplishes some time, but it's cool. Tvoz | talk 20:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

24.127.53.202
According to, this ip is located in Blacksburg, which would put him roughly at the scene. HalfShadow 22:34, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I get Fresno: . Gdo01 22:34, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Test this ip: 70.77.12.95 On any other ip locator, it says I'm located in Illinois. I'm not. I'm located in Prince George, British Columbia and this is the only one that tells me that. I'm not saying it's possible it's incorrect, but being as it's the only IP locator that can tell me that I'm actually where I am, as opposed to a different country altogether... HalfShadow 22:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The IP user has indicated on the talk page that Comcast did a mass moving of IPs. Thats the reason why dnsstuff.com is probably incorrect. I have no idea about your case though. Gdo01 22:40, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Neither do I. I'm just saying it seems a lot more precise than other locators. HalfShadow 22:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

VT
The OSU and FSU responses are relevant, sourced and notable. Please see commented disclaimer regarding criteria for entry into that session. Please do not remove sourced material from the document.

For the record, OSU offered physical assistance to the university, making it relevant and notable. FSU is VT's ACC sister school, making it notable, and it's adoption of VT's security measures in the wake of the shooting is also notable. &rArr;   SWAT Jester    On Belay!  00:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Um, I didn't mean to revert your edit. I was trying to revert the blanking but I guess I was really late. Gdo01 00:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Obama pic
HI - can you tell me why you reverted the picture that is clearly labeled as public domain? Tvoz | talk 23:31, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Kind of busy now. I really don't even remember that edit, I believe I was reverting other vandalism or something. Do as you will with the pic. Gdo01 23:34, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * ok, thank you. Tvoz | talk 23:34, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

speedy deletion
Sorry, I didn't get your message the first time. Also, I didn't create the article. I was just annoyed that someone was trying to delete it. It's spiteful Islamophobia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.196.114.56 (talk • contribs).
 * Not everything is Islamophobia. Lots of the other victims don't have articles. Gdo01 01:24, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I know not everything is, however, the person who edited the main article and took out the link to his page is also the same person who tagged the article. They said something to the effect of "oh please". And besides that, he was not just a victim, but a selfless hero, and several of those other selfless heroes also have bio pages.72.196.114.56 21:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * That was me because I've been going through all the article created. At one point there were 6 of them. 1 is gone, 2 are on the way to gone, 3 will stay. First we gave in for the heroic professors, then we give in to the normal professors, then we give in to students, and then what give in to the injured? Gdo01 01:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Waleed wasn't a normal student or professor. He was a PhD student was indeed heroic, that article was cited. I am waiting for people who actually knew him to contribute basic things to the bio, and then others can contribute things that are cited as well. There are things about him, and as he was a hero, it is appropriate.

Bay of Pigs
This so-called "recent changes patroller" has been subjecting the 'Bay of Pigs' entry on the 'April 19' page to his own point of view. His viewpoint is sympathetic to that of the invading army's. Imagine if any of the anti-colonial struggles of the 1960s/70s were viewed as failures for the colonial armies. He writes that my re-writing of the Bay of Pigs entry as a success for the Cubans is a POV description. Fine, sure it is. So is it a POV description that it was a failure for the invading army. It can't really be avoided. The only question is: which POV do you want to take? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Horse Badorties (talk • contribs) 03:14, 21 April 2007 (UTC).

Johnson space centre shooting
How would the history merge on this article work? I created the article originally, but people kept moving it and now my contributions are no longer in the history. Thanks Ghost Yacht 10:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 23rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:39, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:22, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 7th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:10, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Continued from LOST talk page (getting off topic there)
"Keep having"? I don't agree that I'm falling back on it now (my argument is that it meets WP:EL, and my mention of your so-called "other crap" is just pointing out similar material that also follows EL), but I certainly don't see where you think I've used that argument before. --Minderbinder 23:04, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Nicole (?)
Hah, you're probably right. I bailed on my warning after further examination and determined that I'd made a mistake. But based on later edits it seems you're probably right. Good call. :) Diagonalfish 00:07, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Just a quick thanks for reverting several times the vandalism to Bill Clinton.

Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)