User talk:Gdrg22

Speedy deletion nomination of Marcel Herrmann Telles


A tag has been placed on Marcel Herrmann Telles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Joseph Steven (talk) 00:59, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 20:50, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Edits to Hawking radiation and elsewhere
I realize you're acting with the best of intentions, but please stop using cut-and-paste or "subst" to copy templates/sidebars into articles. The correct way to do this is to just include them with curly-braces (e.g., for what you appear to have tried to do at Hawking radiation). --Christopher Thomas (talk) 21:56, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

New picture of John Archibald Wheeler
Hi, I noticed that you uploaded a new photograph to the John Archibald Wheeler article. I like the new picture, it is much better than the old one, but it has a major issue: it is not clear if we're allowed to host this image on Wikipedia, that is, who holds the copyright and if they published the image under a suitable license. This page strongly suggests that the copyright is owned by Associated Press, and that it may not be freely used without asking them. In contrast to that, you wrote that the picture is in the public domain. If you are sure that the image is really in the public domain, or published under a license that allows use on Wikipedia, please explain why you are sure. If not, then we should not use the image for now.

Please note that this is not a matter of personal taste or any obscure Wikipedia rules. If the image doesn't have the right license, it's simply illegal to use it. You're more than welcome to upload another image, as I said, I like the one you found, but it has to be one that's legal to use.

Another tip: When you make an edit to Wikipedia, please write a short explanation in the Edit summary field, something like "Fixed typo" or "Added link", depending on what you did. This is particulary important if you undo an edit of another user, you should then explain why you do that, so other people can understand what's happening. If in doubt, you can always use an article's talk page to ask questions or to explain what you did.

Best wishes and happy editing! &mdash;&thinsp; H HHIPPO  23:18, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * You might find Help:Edit summary a more useful introduction to edit summaries. RockMagnetist (talk) 23:34, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Oops, yes, that's what I meant. Funny redirect though. &mdash;&thinsp; H HHIPPO  23:41, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

I answered your question on my talk page. &mdash;&thinsp; H HHIPPO  21:26, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Hello, I'm DVdm. This might not have been intentional, but I noticed that you recently removed some content from Physics without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, (Referring to this edit) - DVdm (talk) 11:26, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Edit summaries please
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! - DVdm (talk) 15:11, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:30, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Citing sources
Hi Gdrg22,

I just reverted a clearly inaccurate edit. Please cite sources when adding information to articles.

Regards, HaeB (talk) 04:03, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Please comment
Hi again. I think it would be good if you could comment on this thread. It might be a mere coincidence that all the scientists you have recently 'downgraded' (their names removed from templates and articles etc.) are Jewish, but without any further comments it can easily appear as a systematic bias. You can best avoid that impression by carefully explaining such edits in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. There's also some other issues discussed in that thread, which might be interesting for you. And please, read the message from SineBot above. Thanks a lot! &mdash;&thinsp; H HHIPPO  15:27, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dynamic Theory of Gravity concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dynamic Theory of Gravity, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:25, 20 August 2013 (UTC)