User talk:Gdunk

Welcome!
Hello, Gdunk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Donner60 (talk) 02:21, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Removal of speedy deletion template
I left this message on the article talk page. I am removing the speedy deletion template because I found a You Tube video with a Steven Gray dunk. I have still found nothing on "Gdunk". I now think this should be evaluated on other criteria and in line with the other tags placed on the article. Due to the video, I think this may be agf. I still think it is not notable enough for a stand-alone article even if other sources eventually show up. Sorry if the template was premature or erroneous but I think the verifiability of the article was questionable, especially under the term "Gdunk" which seems not to have gained much currency in the sources yet. The notability still seems questionable.

Again, I encourage you to support the article's facts, and its notability, with reliable and verifiable sources. The other tags placed by other editors remain. Donner60 (talk) 03:25, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Ways to improve Gdunk
Hi, I'm Biciklista10. Gdunk, thanks for creating Gdunk!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Can you demonstrate how this topic is notable?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. —Preceding undated comment added 02:27, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Hello, Gdunk. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Gdunk, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Mediran talk 02:51, 13 October 2012 (UTC)