User talk:Geeenaj

Biased edits is strictly prohibited and and intentional misinterpretation of sources will not be tolerated
Stop make a biased and intentional incorrect edits! Why you noted that another one ceasefire deal is it a strategic rebel victory. Rebels lost two major strongholds the Kafr Nabudah and Qalaat al-Madiq and more than 20 villages and several hills. And this ceasefire deal will be broken as the previous three deals. Your need know that the POV pushing and intentional misinterpretation of data is strictly prohibited. If you are not sure about correctness of your edits, post it on the talk page first so that it would be discussed. In conclusion, I want to say that if you continue to distort the articles and make biased changes, I will inform the administration about your actions.Mehmedsons (talk) 12:03, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry but I was not trying to be biased. Syrian Army has never lost a battle since Russian intervention, they have easily won at least 10 (if not more) battles in past two years against ISIS and rebels around all Syria. However in this battle, many news outlets has pointed out that the Syrian Army hit a brick wall and was ineffective after months of air strikes and bombardments, three months yielded very insignificant results compared to similar campaigns by SAA against ISIS and rebels in other regions. Furthermore, SAA deployed very significant resources including Tiger Forces, Fifth Corps and 4th Division with heavy Russian air support. If you deploy 90% of your significant power with intention to capture a whole region then only manage to capture less than 2% of that region without achieving any of your objectives, then you have lost indeed. Despite all that, it's SAA eventually who declared stop of operations to save face. So this can be considered a turning point for the Syrian Civil War as it's once thought Assad is winning and rebels have collapsed. Therefore, this could be very well strategic victory for rebels. Thanks. Geeenaj (talk) 20:53, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Rebels lost two their strategic strongholds the Kafr Nabudah and Qalaat al-Madiq and many other points. So at the moment it is not a victory, but a defeat. You need know that at this battle not only SAA use many their firepower and human resources but rebels also send most of their forces including elit fighters from TFSA and many heavy weapons which they got from TSK. Battle for Idlib it's a very hard battle. Probably it's the one of the most difficult battles in Syrian war. This area has been under the control of the rebel for a very long time and they have greatly strengthened it. And you, too, are mistaken when you say that the army has stopped the battle. They only sighed another one ceasefire agreement, which is still being violated by both parties. Also for now the both sides send new reinforcements and prepare to new phase of battle. And no any signs that battle will stop. HTS and some others rebel groups refuse the main conditions of ceasefire agreement.Mehmedsons (talk) 13:20, 4 August 2019 (UTC)