User talk:Geek2003/Archive2010

Speedy deletion nomination of Charles Giancarlo
A tag has been placed on Charles Giancarlo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. PhGustaf (talk) 00:31, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Red Horse Squadron articles
Hi. I noticed you created a couple of articles on US Air Force Red Horse squadrons. Per WP:TITLE, the article names should be in lowercase, such as "Red Horse", rather than in all uppercase, such as "RED HORSE". If you are planning to create any more articles in this series I would recommend creating them with the lowercase title. –Grondemar 18:59, 28 August 2010 (UTC)


 * RED HORSE is an Acronyms formed from "Rapid Engineer Deployable Heavy Operational Repair Squadron Engineers" Geek2003 (talk) 19:18, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 203d RED HORSE Squadron
A tag has been placed on 203d RED HORSE Squadron requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Joe Gazz84 user•talk•contribs•Editor Review 01:09, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 203d RED HORSE Squadron


The article 203d RED HORSE Squadron has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article has almost no actual content with no references. Article seems to have about 1 or 2 sentences of actual content. Possible merge.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Joe Gazz84 user•talk•contribs•Editor Review 01:15, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

question at us debt
Hi, I'm writing to inform you I've asked a question about a figure you made for the article. 018 (talk) 03:12, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Northern Electric
Category:Northern Electric, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:30, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * This category was deleted so quickly and with such little debate - why is that, and who is responsible for this deletion? Did anyone at Wikipedia merge the contents somewhere else - in other words is content preserved elsewhere at Wikipedia? Ottawahitech (talk) 20:11, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Click on the redlink to see who deleted it. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:17, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Please join the discussion at Nortel page
Geek2003, we need to create consensus for the evolution of the Nortel page, and since I saw you have contributed a lot to  this article in the past, I thought you may be interested in joining the discussion. Right now only me and another person are actively involved (I think?) in editing the Nortel page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nortel#Criticism_of_Wikipedia_from_outside_Wikipedia Ottawahitech (talk) 20:27, 1 November 2010 (UTC)