User talk:Geeky1127

Welcome!
Hi Geeky1127! I noticed your contributions to John Fetterman&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! JesseRafe (talk) 19:49, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Alex J. Lasry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Mfield (Oi!) 03:37, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Can you check and recover the truth that you deleted after checking it is true? Now I know I violated the rules, but the contents i provided all have credible shouce and it is important to let people know them. Geeky1127 (talk) 03:52, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

I am anxious,the longer truth is not on this page, the more people will be unable to know the fact. Geeky1127 (talk) 03:56, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Alex J. Lasry. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Whisperjanes (talk) 04:37, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Which part of my contribution do not meey BLP standard? Besides, it hasn′t been war now until you revert all my edit. The one who is vandalizing this article is limited by half protection now. Geeky1127 (talk) 04:52, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I was just writing a follow-up to the message I left above (but I tend to be a slow writer). First, I didn't mention a BLP standard in my message. But I see that you started a discussion on the talk page, so thank you for doing that. I'm not trying to start a "war" - I just wanted to let you know that continuously reverting an article back to a version you prefer is usually considered "edit warring" on Wikipedia, regardless of the reason for doing it. There is also a 3 Revert Rule that I recommend you read.More importantly, I see above you said you are anxious, but usually editing takes time and is collaborative on Wikipedia. Take a breath if you need to, or step away if you have to - since we are mostly all volunteer editors here, editing should be fun or, at least, fulfilling.Also, since it seems you are new to Wikipedia, I recommend that you read the five pillars of Wikipedia, which sums up Wikipedia's community policies nicely. I'll respond to your talk page discussion next. Cheers - Whisperjanes (talk) 05:14, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Alex J. Lasry) for edit warring, negative BLP edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 02:06, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 United States Senate election in Wisconsin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wiki9814 (talk) 22:38, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.
 * It seems that you are only here to add negative content to biographies of politicians that you do not like, in violation of our core content policy, the Neutral point of view. Also, you seem incapable of writing coherent English language prose, and competence is required. Cullen328 (talk)

"You seems do not even follow the instruction on WP:CIR and also I do not think listing credible media report is biased, if the candidate feels hurt or promoted they should do things that will give them positive media report instead of negative report." Hmm: "You seem to not even follow the instructions...": I could go on. Misspellings, faulty grammar, lack of subject-verb agreement, comma splices, and that's before we even get to your complete misunderstanding of how encyclopedias work, with reliable sourcing and all that. It's truly amazing. You could have just started by Englishing. Drmies (talk) 13:44, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Geeky1127. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)