User talk:Geestferal

October 2022
Hello, I'm 2601:246:C080:38C0:79AE:567:AFAF:1729. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 2601:246:C080:38C0:79AE:567:AFAF:1729 (talk) 13:40, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 2601:246:C080:38C0:79AE:567:AFAF:1729 (talk) 13:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:246:C080:38C0:79AE:567:AFAF:1729 (talk) 14:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Personal and professional information manager
Hello Geestferal,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username EchidnaLives, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Personal and professional information manager, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Personal information manager. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion] but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

echidnaLives -  talk  -  edits  05:09, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Geestferal. Thank you for your work on Personal and professional information manager. User:EchidnaLives, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

echidnaLives -  talk  -  edits  05:10, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

CS1 error on Microsoft Dynamics 365
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Microsoft Dynamics 365, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Geestferal&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1171042394 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:16, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Microsoft_Dynamics_365&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1171042394%7CMicrosoft%20Dynamics%20365%5D%5D Ask for help])

August 2023
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 19:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC)


 * were you nervous Mr. Ollie? using so many technical terms to hide your resentment through your poor argumentation?
 * haha..
 * have a good time :) Geestferal (talk) 19:25, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Our target audience is schoolkids. We write for them, not for marketing reps. MrOllie (talk) 19:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * And do you think that the description of this product "talks" or is it understandable to this target audience that you mentioned? be sincere... Geestferal (talk) 19:33, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * and another question, we are talking about the product: Microsoft dynamics 365 clearly aimed at the corporate sector, what is the probability of a school-aged child looking for information about this product in particular? Geestferal (talk) 19:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The probability is high. This is exactly what Wikipedia opening paragraphs are for - giving a quick overview of something the reader has never encountered before. As to do you think that the description of this product "talks" or is it understandable to this target audience that you mentioned, your version uses industry buzzwords and acronyms right out the gate. That is poor writing, and incomprehensible to most members of the public. MrOllie (talk) 19:41, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I respect your opinion, but I disagree. have a good time. Geestferal (talk) 19:48, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * in this specific case we are writing for researchers, entrepreneurs, journalists, developers and decision makers in the industry in general which this product is of interest to. I think the simplicity, cohesion and understanding in the previous description covered these cases, at least in my opinion.
 * but that's ok, feel free. Geestferal (talk) 19:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC)