User talk:Geggybee1/sandbox

Peer Review
Great content and summary of various ccs projects overall. I would suggest standardizing the subsections among the different projects that are being updated. It seems that all have an overview and a description of the technology. However, some only cover the environmental impact while some only cover the economic impact. Also some do not cover a timeline or current status. If all projects summarized included sections for all of the ccs projects, it would make comparison of the projects much more effective.

Additionally, to make the projects more visual, diagrams showing where the ccs is in relation to the project would be very helpful. A chart possibly showing differences in key parameters of the different projects could also be useful.

C yantist (talk) 03:34, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

After reading all sections I thought they were all excellent summaries. Very concise, well drafted, relevant and objective. I would however suggest that all section provide the same subheadings and similar information to be more cohesive. Make sure to make good use of the links since there were some sections that could use more. Other than that, well use of references and sources to date.

Monica.rdz.ma (talk) 05:35, 2 May 2017 (UTC)User: Monica.rdz.ma