User talk:GeisterXfahrer

August 2011
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page "Shady" Jeff Philips worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cerejota (talk) 08:32, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia from Cerejota
Hi, GeisterXfahrer. I welcome you to Wikipedia! Thank you for all of your edits. I hope you like editing here and being part of Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); when you save the page, this will turn into your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or put  (and what you need help with) on your talk page and someone will show up very soon to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Cerejota (talk) 08:32, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter Pepper


A tag has been placed on Peter Pepper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. 99.155.206.229 (talk) 21:29, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter pepper (musician)


A tag has been placed on Peter pepper (musician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies.  Bramble  claw  x   23:31, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Peter Pepper articles
Please do not continue to create articles under different names unless you can provide citations to reliable sources establishing his notability. If you wish to work on the article without having it deleted, please create the article in your user space at User:GeisterXfahrer/Peter Pepper. Once you are done with the article, you may copy it to the article space. However, like I said, you need to provide sources to establish his notability as the article has been previously deleted through as deletion discussion. Please address the issues brought up in the article when you are working on a new version. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:33, 17 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Re your message: The article has been deleted because it was determined through a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Peter Pepper (2nd nomination) that he is not currently notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia and your new article did not address the issues brought up in the deletion discussion. For the article to remain on Wikipedia, you must show that he meets the notability guidelines for musicians by, for example, having released multiple albums for a major label or important indie label.  You may also show that he meets the general notability guideline by showing that he has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable and are independent from him.  For example, he may qualify if there exists multiple reviews of his albums or news articles about him.  You have not provided any of those requirements in your recreated article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:02, 18 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Re your message: I saw that review, but you need to provide citations to multiple reviews. As for the major record label issue, the issue is notability, not like-ability.  What qualifies for notability has been discussed for many years and having released on a major label or important indie label is what the current consensus is on one of the criteria.  See the guideline for additional criteria.  You can try to expand the criteria by discussing the issue on the talk page to include other things, but just being like-able is probably not going to get a consensus for inclusion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:27, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peter Pepper (Retard-O-Bot)


The article Peter Pepper (Retard-O-Bot) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not meet notability guidelines for musicians.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Singularity42 (talk) 02:36, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter Pepper (Retard-O-Bot)


A tag has been placed on Peter Pepper (Retard-O-Bot), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Singularity42 (talk) 02:36, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:51, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Shady Jeff Phillips.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Shady Jeff Phillips.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Peter Peppernet.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Peter Peppernet.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 16:54, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Miranda Cosgrove
Your overly detailed addition about Cosgrove's broken ankle has been reverted. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Thanks. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 02:26, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page before restoring this information. The current consensus there is that a detailed account of the accident is unnecessary. Thank you. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 03:31, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter Pepper (musician)


A tag has been placed on Peter Pepper (musician), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sum mer PhD (talk) 02:29, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring at Miranda Cosgrove
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Miranda Cosgrove. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. –CWenger ( ^ •  @ ) 04:33, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Nomination of Peter Pepper for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Pepper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Peter Pepper (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cerejota (talk) 07:45, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Peter Peppernet.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Peter Peppernet.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. , and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cerejota (talk) 09:01, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Shady Jeff Phillips.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Shady Jeff Phillips.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cerejota (talk) 13:40, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:PeterFairUse.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:PeterFairUse.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NtheP (talk) 17:12, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Adventurepunk.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Adventurepunk.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. , and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. NtheP (talk) 19:11, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

You don't own the copyright on the photo therefore you can't licence it as such. if you have permission from the copyright holder to use the phot then wikipedia needs to see that permission. Please read WP:PERMISSION for more details on how to achieve this. NtheP (talk) 19:13, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Miranda Cosgrove
I'm not sure why you're telling me that you didn't vandalize Miranda Cosgrove's article: I've never said you have been, and if you're referring to my protection of the article, I did that back in March of 2009, long before any edits you made to the page. Hope that helps. Acalamari 21:05, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Pepperandfan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pepperandfan.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Miranda Cosgrove
Your edit summaries and a posting on another editor's talk page seem to indicate that you are feeling frustrated in your editing of Miranda Cosgrove. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page. There has already been some discussion there and the consensus there seems to indicate that the bus crash and minor injury do not warrant as much detail as you wish to include. Thanks. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 22:16, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Country Grammar (Hot Shit), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  RepublicanJacobite  TheFortyFive 02:46, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter pepper (musician)


A tag has been placed on Peter pepper (musician), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Singularity42 (talk) 03:10, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Peter pepper (musician), you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. VQuakr (talk) 03:13, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Peter pepper (musician). If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's . Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Singularity42 (talk) 03:20, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Peter pepper (musician).  Marlith  (Talk)   03:21, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia Hates Up And Coming Artists


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia Hates Up And Coming Artists, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Marlith  (Talk)   03:44, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia Hates Up And Coming Artists


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia Hates Up And Coming Artists, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Singularity42 (talk) 03:49, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --John (talk) 04:16, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Retardobotlive2005.jpg


The file File:Retardobotlive2005.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:35, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Lynz2005.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lynz2005.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:36, 19 July 2018 (UTC)