User talk:Gelatart

Notability of A.I. Botnick
A tag has been placed on A.I. Botnick requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pastor Theo (talk) 03:16, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Notability of Magnolia Mutual Life Insurance Company
The article Magnolia Mutual Life Insurance Company has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —C.Fred (talk) 03:17, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of B'nai Brith Anti-Defamation League
A tag has been placed on B'nai Brith Anti-Defamation League requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wperdue (talk) 03:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Your recent articles
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Pastor Theo (talk) 03:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Additionally, please make sure you have read the manual of style and especially the sections on internal linking. Your recent edits appear to be overlinking articles, especially with regard to dates. —C.Fred (talk) 03:41, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Disruptive linking
Please stop. Your overlinking articles does not comply with our guideline on that and is disruptive. Please read the link I have provided. You will be blocked if this continues. Toddst1 (talk) 04:50, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Disruptive edits!
I know that you lately haven't been trying to make any disruptive edits, but actually they are. I understand you are trying to make good faith edits, but really really, you need to read the article about links first. Try to make almost all your edits constructive and please I know you can do better than just adding links. For example your edit to Kung Fu Panda was a example of a constructive dit. I hope you learned something and make better edits on wikipedia! Happy edits! -- Spittle spat  03:44, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

userpage...
I'll finish your userpage during the weekend. I'm very busy with schoolwork right now! See ya!-- Spittle spat  00:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm glad your edits are improving a little.-- Spittle spat  18:22, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

sorry but I'm took your barnstar away. You can't just add links to a image like what you did to Pokemon. Try editing something else for a change that doesn't have to do with links.-- Spittle spat  23:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Dude, NOTICE!!!!!!!!FINAL JUDGEMENT!
Ruuuuuugghhhhhhh...ROARRR!!! Notice, Gelatart! Are you a old man? NOTICE YOUR TALK PAGE! It was overflowing! FINAL JUDGEMENT! (flash flash)I am Arceus! (flash flash!) Clean out your thing! (FlAsH!)It looks like too big of a mess!(FLASHhhh...hewpewhew) THIS IS FINAL JUDGEMENT!!! TO GET RID OF ARTICLES, DELETE EVERYTHING IN IT! DON'T TAKE OVER WIKIPEDIA THOUGH! GRAHHH, TALKING IN CAPITAL LETTERS REALLY TIRES ONE OUT! Whew, that's better. Uffff, Don't take over Wiki though, this was the Final Jugement. P.S. Wikipedia, just because you have returned Rotom to it's redirect state, doesn't mean this is the end of Arceus. It was the beginning! Rah...uh...I quit. Bye. Arceus493 (talk) 02:53, 9 July 2009 (UTC)HGVSS You have not heard the last of Arceus493, uf...

leave him alone... and pelase stop makign these werid messages.