User talk:Gelcap

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Portrait
Hi: I found that the prank image uploaded by Daniel Radosh had a colorful, even exuberant, old-school journalistic feel to it. The new one looks to be done in sepia and feels more clubby. If you do happen to attempt at a portrait of yourself (I could suggest you a good amateur photographer who works in High dynamic range imaging but she does not reside in New York) all that is really needed is a decent, colored, non-pixelated, head shot that resembles you. This effort, should you choose to undertake it, would be for the sake of free information of course. To another subject, I enjoyed "End it, Don't Mend it" which makes a very true point, but excuse me if I do not summarize the point you made (I have done enough of this in school) to prove I know the point you were making. Let's leave that to the encyclopedias. Trust that I do understand, and that hopefully one day science will be ubiquitous enough that we will all take it for granted and simply use the Method in any and all fields. I look forward to reading your future columns. Best regards, BillDeanCarter (talk) 20:53, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Brunoathome.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Brunoathome.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Cirt (talk) 08:42, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Bruno Maddox
Fuckers, huh? So Discover magazine thinks they can get away with not publishing online "The James Watson Affair." Now I know why there was a delay of a month or two between publishing your articles in print and then later online... it was so they can do this. Obviously negative letters poured in, right? Enough to warrant this publishing crime. What kind of punishment to mete out? I am working on it. Glycon the God (talk) 03:04, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Please refrain in the future from making insane assumptions of the likes of above, Mr. Glycon. There are many reasons why an article may not be published online, and only in the print edition. Sometimes the article title will appear online but the article will only be available in print so that you buy the print edition. Your talk of a publishing crime on the part of Discover magazine is hilariously ludicrous. It may have been the contributor who did not want the article to be published online. Tally-ho, Loose Noose (talk) 23:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Brunoinoffice.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Brunoinoffice.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:33, 31 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:33, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Somewhere in the offices of Discover
Hello: Looks like a technical snafu took down the portrait you uploaded of Bruno Maddox. Probably if you re-upload the photo and specify who created the photograph in the offices of Discover, that will be sufficient. Please do, as it was a much needed improvement to the Bruno Maddox article. Toodles, Loose Noose (talk) 23:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)