User talk:Gemineye611

Notability of Gemineye
A tag has been placed on Gemineye requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - Warthog Demon  01:28, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Gemineye
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gemineye, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://gemineye.info. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:47, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Gemineye
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Gemineye, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Gemineye appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Gemineye has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 16:47, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Gemineye
Just want to tell you that instead of seeking to have the copyright problems cleared through WP:OTRS, your efforts would be more constructive should you, instead, start a new article from scratch. The material you submitted is, for the most part, a violation of our neutrality policy in that it promotes the subject in a very subjective matter, which will inevitably lead to the wholesale deletion of the entire offending sections regardless of copyright status. Also, the subject's notability is not asserted in the article, and that should be your priority.

Hope this sheds some light on the matter. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 16:53, 18 December 2009 (UTC)