User talk:Gen-Asher/A’s Quare Theory, Queer and Religion Communication Intersections, and HIV/AIDS LGBTQ+ Health Communication

Peer Review
Gen-Asher. I think you did a great job. Your sources look great and are cited correctly. The sources look good. I think your opinion does not change your topics. Great job, I have no bad feedback on this one more than maybe try to go more into detail in your paragraph. Simoneta Reliz (talk) 04:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I am glad to hear that the paragraph reads well to you because I really took my time with this. I do plan on adding one or two more sentences along with another source in order to break down some of this jargon.Thanks! Gen-Asher (talk) 00:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Dr. E Review
A, thanks for this starting draft. As you introduce some important concepts for your section, these will need unpacking to avoid jargon like intersectionality and vernacular. You will also need an overview to how Quare Theory fits in intersectionality section. Please see my other Canvas feedback to respond to as well. OsaRosa (talk) 06:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I've created a to-do list for this paragraph using the feedback on canvas. I will add the Johnson source that I already have procured and am reading in order to add detail and explain the intersectionality of Quare and other vernacular. I spelled the last Quare with a K because that is how it is used in that source, but it makes sense to not do this in order maintain continuity. Finally after rereading the paragraph a few times I will add some connecting sentences and informational sentences from the new source(Johnson). Purpose:make clear my intentions with the topic. Gen-Asher (talk) 00:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC)