User talk:Gen. Quon/Archive 4

A barnstar for you!

 * Hey, thanks so much! I think it's one of my favs too!!-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   04:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 15:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

x-files images
Hi there

Your deletions of my movie screenshots for the X-files are quite disappointing. I don't know what is wrong with 4-D. Anyway, I guess you like the TXF series just as I do. Maybe you will add images for still screenshotless episodes? I guess all the episodes should be covered with none left behind.

Best regards, Lamro (talk) 15:02, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ricardio the Heart Guy
The article Ricardio the Heart Guy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Ricardio the Heart Guy for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ruby2010 -- 03:42, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ricardio the Heart Guy
The article Ricardio the Heart Guy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ricardio the Heart Guy for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ruby2010 -- 17:52, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Classy Christmas
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Classy Christmas you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hmlarson -- 02:51, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Death in Bloom
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Death in Bloom you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hmlarson -- 04:02, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Death in Bloom
The article Death in Bloom you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Death in Bloom for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hmlarson -- 04:12, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

 * Thank you! :)-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   15:37, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Classy Christmas
The article Classy Christmas you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Classy Christmas for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hmlarson -- 04:32, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fionna and Cake
The article Fionna and Cake you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fionna and Cake for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of New Age Retro Hippie -- 11:52, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

WP Television in the Signpost
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Television for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 21:41, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Please drop by and answer some questions.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

ADVENTURE TIME WHAT TIM E IS IT
ADVENTURE TIME — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.19.160.183 (talk) 05:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lady & Peebles
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lady & Peebles you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- 01:52, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Finn the Human (Adventure Time episode)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Finn the Human (Adventure Time episode) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- 02:02, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jake the Dog (Adventure Time episode)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jake the Dog (Adventure Time episode) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- 02:02, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Evicted!
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Evicted! you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- 02:02, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Puhoy
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Puhoy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- 02:02, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Finn the Human (Adventure Time episode)
The article Finn the Human (Adventure Time episode) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Finn the Human (Adventure Time episode) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- 05:42, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jake the Dog (Adventure Time episode)
The article Jake the Dog (Adventure Time episode) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Jake the Dog (Adventure Time episode) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- 14:52, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Puhoy
The article Puhoy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Puhoy for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- 22:52, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jake the Dog (Adventure Time episode)
The article Jake the Dog (Adventure Time episode) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jake the Dog (Adventure Time episode) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- 03:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Puhoy
The article Puhoy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Puhoy for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- 03:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lady & Peebles
The article Lady & Peebles you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Lady & Peebles for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- 19:22, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Evicted!
The article Evicted! you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Evicted! for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- 21:42, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lady & Peebles
The article Lady & Peebles you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lady & Peebles for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- 02:02, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Evicted!
The article Evicted! you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Evicted! for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- 02:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Finn the Human (Adventure Time episode)
The article Finn the Human (Adventure Time episode) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Finn the Human (Adventure Time episode) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- 02:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

I have not forgotten you!
Just a note to let you know that I have not forgotten your request for me to look over "all things". I am planning to review it within the next week. (& I've had it pinned to a tab in my Google Chrome since your request!) Thanks for your patience! "Type" to you soon! JudyCS (talk) 04:30, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

all things
I have completed my copy edit of all things -- good article! Thank you for giving me the opportunity to look it over for you, & let me know when you need anything else. JudyCS (talk) 00:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for my barnstar, Gen. Quon, I appreciate it! Please feel free to let me know if you'd like my assistance on any other articles -- you've steered me to some really good, fascinating reading!  Thank you very much!  JudyCS (talk) 00:34, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Fuck peer review, again

 * 1) Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties
 * 2) Wikipedia:Peer review/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1

I've listed the article Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties for peer review.

Help with furthering along the quality improvement process would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1.

Thank you for your time,

&mdash; Cirt (talk) 01:11, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

SPQR
The translation section linked from the lead already covers the word-for-word translation. Neither is actually more literal, since "Romanus" literally means "of Rome". Also, "que" has the effect that the adjective applies to both nouns. "The Senate and the People of Rome" has been widely used for many years. Ian Dalziel (talk) 13:07, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

(But apologies for the bald revert of a serious edit) Ian Dalziel (talk) 15:25, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Quick favour
Hey, man, do you still have the Shearman and Pearson review book? I've totally lost mine and have been relying on Amazon's preview feature for a while, but some of the contents are inaccessible—including the material for The Fourth Horseman, which I'm trying to write the article for. If you still have a copy, could you give me the gist of what they said about it? It's on page 162. If you don't have it to hand don't worry, I'll probably end up picking up the kindle version in the future so it's always to hand anyway. GRAPPLE  X  05:14, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Adventure Time and Regular Show
Well, there maybe some same writers but, to be considered a related show, they would probably have to give some hint, that they exist in the same universe, or at least reference each other. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RabidBadger1632 (talk • contribs) 03:03, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * It has less to do with them being in the same universe, and more with them being highly interconnected, productivity-wise. Benton Connor and J. G. Quintel both boarded for AT and Regular Show, many of the crew members from both (Pen Ward, Cole Sanchez, Quintel, Kent Osborne, Somvilay Xayaphone) worked on Flapjack. While not in the same universe, they're very much related to one another.

GAN March 2014 Backlog Drive
The March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on April 1, 2014! Sent by Dom497 on behalf of MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

I have a question.
Hi. I have a question about Adventure Time (pilot). Is it ture that it was aired as a stand-alone short in January 2007, not just uploaded on the Internet? I can't turst this tumblr article. (Sorry for my poor English)--Namoroka (talk) 13:22, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your reply. Actually, I have translated it into Korean two months ago, but original article has changed. So I was confused. This is the reason for the question. Thank you once again! --Namoroka (talk) 04:42, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Finale
Good job getting all that information for the finale. I've already gone through it a bit. Just some side notes: punctuation would only go inside a quotation if it's a full statement and not a partial statement. I changed "Finale" to "the finale", because it's really not an actual title, like "Prophecy", but an association of the final episode. I need to go through the whole thing, but it looks good. We'll need to put in for a copyedit at some point.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  14:14, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Be More (Adventure Time)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Be More (Adventure Time) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ruby2010 -- Ruby2010 (talk) 03:01, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Be More (Adventure Time)
The article Be More (Adventure Time) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Be More (Adventure Time) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ruby2010 -- Ruby2010 (talk) 01:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Betty (Adventure Time)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Betty (Adventure Time) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quenhitran -- Quenhitran (talk) 09:41, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Be More (Adventure Time)
The article Be More (Adventure Time) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Be More (Adventure Time) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ruby2010 -- Ruby2010 (talk) 01:41, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Betty (Adventure Time)
The article Betty (Adventure Time) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Betty (Adventure Time) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quenhitran -- Quenhitran (talk) 05:01, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

FA review
Hi Glen. Do you wish to check the prose or non-free media files in Megadeth, my FA nominee? The review page is here, so your input will be appreciated. If not interested, please write me back so that I know whether to contact another editor. All the best.--Retrohead (talk) 07:12, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * My apology, now I see it is Gen. Were you interested in reviewing the nomination?--Retrohead (talk) 16:29, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ha' K'in Xook
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ha' K'in Xook you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:21, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ha' K'in Xook
The article Ha' K'in Xook you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ha' K'in Xook for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:41, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ha' K'in Xook
The article Ha' K'in Xook you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ha' K'in Xook for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:42, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Consolatio (Cicero)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Consolatio (Cicero) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:01, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Consolatio (Cicero)
The article Consolatio (Cicero) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Consolatio (Cicero) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:21, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Alapalooza
I have no idea how this got there in the first place, I must have accidentally edited an old revision or something... anyways, thanks for catching that... after all the times I (and others) have had to remove this, it would have been fairly embarrassing if my edit was the one that made it stick! Canadian  Paul  04:58, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Ha' K'in Xook
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:21, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Straight Outta Lynwood
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Straight Outta Lynwood you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seattle -- Seattle (talk) 15:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Eclogue 4
Hello! Your submission of Eclogue 4 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BethNaught (talk) 08:37, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Consolatio (Cicero)
The article Consolatio (Cicero) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Consolatio (Cicero) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:23, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Straight Outta Lynwood
The article Straight Outta Lynwood you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Straight Outta Lynwood for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seattle -- Seattle (talk) 19:21, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Eclogue 4
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:41, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Good articles Future GAN Backlog Drive
Hello everyone! Hope you've all been having a great summer!

TheQ Editor recently proposed the idea of having another Backlog Drive in either September/October or November/December of this year. For those of you who have participated in the past two drives you know I was the one who organized them, however, come September, this will be my most important year in school so I will not be able to coordinate this drive (if it happens). TheQ Editor has volunteered to be a coordinator for the drive. If any of you would like to co-coordinator, please notify TheQ Editor on his talk page.

If you would be interested in participating in a Backlog Drive sometime before the end of this year, please notify TheQ Editor. Also, make sure to specify what month(s) work best for you.

At the time this message was sent out, the backlog was at 520 nominations. Since May, the backlog has been steadily increasing and we are currently near an all time high. Even though the backlog will not disappear over one drive, this drive can lead to several others which will (hopefully) lead to the day where there is no longer a backlog.

As always, the more participants, the better, and everyone is encouraged to participate!

Sent by Dom497 --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Straight Outta Lynwood
The article Straight Outta Lynwood you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Straight Outta Lynwood for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seattle -- Seattle (talk) 13:22, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I passed the article, the bot must have delivered that message from the failed GA template on the talkpage. Seattle (talk) 14:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Whoops! No worries. Thank you!-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   14:26, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Chris Gragg
Chris Gragg is a current featured article candidate. If you have the time, please do take a look. Thanks. Seattle (talk) 14:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Consolatio (Cicero)
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:56, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Itzam K'an Ahk II
The article Itzam K'an Ahk II you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Itzam K'an Ahk II for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Brianann MacAmhlaidh -- Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 21:23, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Marceline the Vampire Queen
The only reason I included her under that category was that Princess Bubblegum was (and still is) under the same category. --BenStein69 (talk) 19:48, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Understandable. I'm sorry if I appeared rash, but since we're on weird ground with the claim (it hasn't appeared in the show, nor has Pen Ward himself said it), I don't feel it is entirely accurate to label both of them as LGBT characters /yet/. Maybe one day, when more concrete evidence comes about that isn't so hearsay-y.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   20:27, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * In the sources given, though, Olivia Olsen states that Pen Ward told her about the relationship. That makes the "outing" not unsimilar to the one of Dumbledore by J.K. Rowling. How much more concrete does it need to get? Mythic Writerlord (talk) 21:27, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The thing is that Pen Ward didn't say, he's merely reported to have said. Considering that for some people this could be quite a controversial fact, I think we should err on the side of caution and try to get a source directly from the horse's mouth, so to speak.. Also, the fact that it hasn't happened in the show means just that: it hasn't happened. There's a difference between something being planned, and something being "canon" (people love to jump on that word, even thought they don't know what it means). I just think there needs to be more of a finite answer to this than the kind of grey area we are in right now. My two cents. I just want some consensus.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   03:07, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The impression I am getting is that there having been "something" is indeed canon, whereas there currently been something is not. It would be safest to go with "unknown relationship", probably. As far as the category goes, it does not have to be added per se. Just mentioning the interview's existence would more then suffice for now until a better source is found. Mythic Writerlord (talk) 05:34, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh yes, the interview is mentioned, under the "controversy" section.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   14:58, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

A beer for you!

 * Haha! Thank you!-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   15:00, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

GA Cup
Hello everyone! We hope you have all been having a great summer!

As we all know, the recent GAN Backlog Drives have not had any big impact on the backlog. Because of that, me (Dom497), Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor have worked on an idea that could possibly finally put a dent into the massive backlog. Now, I will admit, the idea isn't entirely ours as we have took the general idea of the WikiCup and brought it over to WikiProject Good Articles. But anyways, here's what we have in mind:

For all of you that do not know what the WikiCup is, it is an annual competition between several editors to see who can get the most Good Articles, Featured Article's, Did You Know's, etc. Based of this, we propose to you the GA Cup. This competition will only focus on reviewing Good articles.

For more info on the proposal, click here. As a FYI, the proposal page is not what the final product will look like (if you do go ahead with this idea). It will look very similar to WikiCup's page(s).

The discussion for the proposal will take place here. Please let us know if you are interested, have any concerns, things to consider, etc.

--Dom497, Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Robert Ryan Cory
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  00:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

"formatting nicely"
How do I do that? I'm not sure how to do it. Can you do it for me? It's a book for the info.--Taeyebaar (talk) 00:46, 9 September 2014 (UTC)


 * No prob. Tell me about it. I just don't think fantasy would be a good description as other people might think because it would have to include mythology and fairytale themes, folklore etc.--Taeyebaar (talk) 04:33, 9 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Nah you ain't a butt. I know some users who that can best describe (:-D) but you ain't one of those. About the X-Files I think supernatural fiction describes the non-mythology episodes that deal with ghost stories, black magic, curses and other stand off "monster of the week" episodes that clearly do not qualify as science fiction. Even the article on supernatural fiction pretty much discusses that.--Taeyebaar (talk) 20:50, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Also forgot to add, the second film in the franchise pretty much qualifies as that as well.--Taeyebaar (talk) 20:56, 9 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Last question. Do you think we should add conspiracy fiction to the X-Files info box? It's legitimate given the show's main plot line is government conspiracy. Only problem is I don't know how to stick it into the infobox and that the sources don't directly state it's conspiracy fiction. Let me know what you think. Thanks.--Taeyebaar (talk) 00:48, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Fair enough--Taeyebaar (talk) 00:27, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Itzam K'an Ahk II
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:20, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Finale (Smallville)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Finale (Smallville) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 17:22, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Finale (Smallville)
The article Finale (Smallville) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Finale (Smallville) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 18:02, 3 October 2014 (UTC)


 * CONGRATULATIONS!   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  19:35, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you! :)-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   19:56, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Finale (Smallville)
The article Finale (Smallville) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Finale (Smallville) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 19:42, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of K'inich Yo'nal Ahk I
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article K'inich Yo'nal Ahk I you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 09:02, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of K'inich Yo'nal Ahk I
The article K'inich Yo'nal Ahk I you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:K'inich Yo'nal Ahk I for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 16:43, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Voltaire biography
Hi Gen. Quon. Of course you're right, the footnote about Voltaire is OR, and moreover, my notes about Voltaire are intentionally cynical. I was just waiting for someone to read them :) I am unhappy that there are so many very serious looking publications that minimise Voltaire's actions, and represent the authorities' reaction as unjust. If I would steal a bike, I get in trouble with the police. If Voltaire would steal one, he would be in trouble with the "Authorities", or with "le Pouvoir". And someone would write that he was imprisoned numerous times for minor offenses.

Voltaire surely knew that alleging that the Regent made a child to his own daughter, and had poisoned people, is a serious crime (slander, calumny, libel..), in those days as well as now. His second and last imprisonment was preventative, after he proferred menaces against the Prince of Rohan. Voltaire was never locked up for his opinions, such actions were very rare in the Ancien Régime. Locking up, or killing people for what they had written became more frequent after the Révolution introduced Liberty and then started chopping off the heads of its enemies. Voltaire was a vain, conceited AH. Very influential, he abused his power to get his literary enemies in trouble. As had to experience Élie Fréron, whose publication was stopped by Voltaire - and who got in jail -, or La Baumelle, also jailed by actions of Voltaire. Nevertheless, most publications present Voltaire as the champion of Liberty of Speech. There was only one Liberty of Speech that Voltaire knew, that was his own. Riyadi (talk) 12:36, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Permanent Record: Al in the Box
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Permanent Record: Al in the Box you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 18:01, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Permanent Record: Al in the Box
The article Permanent Record: Al in the Box you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Permanent Record: Al in the Box for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 03:42, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Yo'nal Ahk III
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yo'nal Ahk III you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 16:03, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of K'inich Yat Ahk II
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article K'inich Yat Ahk II you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 16:05, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Yo'nal Ahk III
The article Yo'nal Ahk III you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Yo'nal Ahk III for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 05:01, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of K'inich Yat Ahk II
The article K'inich Yat Ahk II you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:K'inich Yat Ahk II for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 15:42, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Son of the Bronx for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Son of the Bronx is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Son of the Bronx until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 23W 00:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Yo'nal Ahk III
The article Yo'nal Ahk III you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Yo'nal Ahk III for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 00:42, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of K'inich Yat Ahk II
The article K'inich Yat Ahk II you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:K'inich Yat Ahk II for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 00:43, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Billy's Bucket List
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Billy's Bucket List you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 18:42, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wake Up (Adventure Time)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wake Up (Adventure Time) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 14 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. 23W 06:35, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I've made some comments at Talk:Wake Up (Adventure Time)/GA1 for a possible merger with Escape from the Citadel, though they don't necessarily concern the good article criteria. Thanks. 23W 23:29, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Escape from the Citadel
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Escape from the Citadel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 14 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. 23W 06:35, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Yo'nal Ahk III
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:58, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wake Up (Adventure Time)
The article Wake Up (Adventure Time) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Wake Up (Adventure Time) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 23W -- 23W (talk) 20:03, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of K'inich Yat Ahk II
Hello! Your submission of K'inich Yat Ahk II at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Constantine  ✍  22:48, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wake Up / Escape from the Citadel
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wake Up / Escape from the Citadel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 14 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. 23W 04:27, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Escape from the Citadel
The article Escape from the Citadel you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Escape from the Citadel for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 23W -- 23W (talk) 04:42, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Hey, thanks! If I ever have some more free time, I'll keep on working on them!-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   20:37, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for K'inich Yat Ahk II
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:41, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wake Up / Escape from the Citadel
The article Wake Up / Escape from the Citadel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wake Up / Escape from the Citadel for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. 23W 04:17, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for K'inich Yo'nal Ahk I
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Billy's Bucket List
The article Billy's Bucket List you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Billy's Bucket List for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 18:22, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Volcano (The Presidents of the United States of America song)


The article Volcano (The Presidents of the United States of America song) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 13:34, 5 December 2014 (UTC)