User talk:GeneM18

GeneM18, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Could you add the Tour Finals for Johanna Larsson as well please RaiffHowe (talk) 17:00, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Naomi Osaka WTA 125 chart
I'm not sure why you reverted on particular chart at Naomi Osaka away from Tennis Project guidelines? Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:41, 20 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The WTA 125 Series has its own sepecific section which is just like a Tier 1 finals or year end Finals or Grand Slam Finals table. I didn’t think those guidelines affected those? I have created a lot of those Finals tables especially for the lower ranked players who have reached either singles or doubles finals. A lot of players had been ignored so I created all the tables like that.
 * Hmmm. The guidelines aren't totally specific for the women on the WTA 125s. Probably since the guidelines were made before they created the WTA 125s. The WTA 125s are supposed to be equivalent to the upper tier of the men's challenger level events. Those men's tables are treated just like the ITF events and just like the guidelines for WTA finals. Those ITF and 125s are not part of the WTA Tour, the wins don't count for the WTA Tour. You have a point that it looks like the Tier 1 finals or grand slam finals tables, but we don't treat the mens minor league events that way. Plus, we do not use columns in the Tier 1 or Grand Slam sections like Outcome, No., or the full date (only the year), if it was done your way. Often the men's challenger table is blended with the ITF table, and we could certainly do the same with the ladies as we did with Chung Hyeon or like we do with Roger Federer. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:26, 20 March 2018 (UTC)


 * It sure is a difficult one. The 125 Series certainly isn’t part of the wta tour but I also feel like it’s much bigger than any challenger event which is why it has its own table. I created those tables to look like the old style or should I say non standard WTA Finals chart because I thought it would be the simplest way to display the info. Also since it is a one tier section I did not think there was any need for the category column. As I said I noticed that the majority of players who had played in either singles but mostly doubles finals had no information added so I took it upon myself to create those tables, maybe I am wrong but someone had to add these details in order to keep articles up to date.
 * I'm glad you added them... it's a thankless job. I'll ask at the Tennis Project to see what people think... or maybe it's already been asked. Cheers. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:03, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I posted it at Tennis Project to see if anyone has some insight. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:38, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Kontaveit
Don't edit war! And don't use we don't arguments because who are you. There is no rules that same tournament has to be on two rows. Better to go clutter free as general rules are. -Klõps (talk) 19:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Considering you are going against the general rule as seen on all other tennis players charts I believe you are wrong. No other player has a chart like that. I get that you have put a lot of effort into that page but I would rather have all the charts the same.


 * Stop edit warring x2! Main article has enough to have Grand slam results, if notable enough separate career statistics page will be created. Also the table is full of mistakes as an editor before your last undo pointed out. Klõps (talk) 15:47, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Signing your posts
Always sign Your posts with four tildes:. Read here:Signatures. --Klõps (talk) 16:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

First winners
I am not sure ehy you are hostile to including the first winner in various GAA competitions. It is a normal feature in many articles.Pmunited (talk)

Hi, It isn’t consistent with other articles and adds unnecessary extra information into the info box. Current winner and Most successful is all that is necessary as compared to other sports. It would be very easy to find the first winner in the various tables provided in the articles.