User talk:Gene S. Poole

== Welcome! ==

Thanks for creating an account!
Much appreciated. / edgarde 06:50, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey, anytime (though I suspect it would be less appreciated if I kept it up). Gene S. Poole 03:55, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

An Automated Message from HagermanBot
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 00:02, 31 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Grrrrr, I know that. And if I forget, it's added seconds later. And you're a bot, so why am I defending myself??
 * Gene S. Poole 00:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Mario Party stuff
You've done great work with Mario Party 7; would you like to work on other Mario Party articles (Mario Party, Mario Party 4, etc.)? I left a comment at most of the talk pages, too. –Llama mansign here 20:22, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Really? Are they all as bad as that one?? Gene S. Poole 00:05, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Not quite, though most of them do have a list of minigames. –Llama mansign here 00:07, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Alright, sounds good...probably not today, but starting tomorrow I'mm try to tackle the other Mario Party(s). Any in particular that need attention or are they all pretty bad? (1-8?)((are they up to 8 yet? I can't remember)) Gene S. Poole 00:47, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I'd say 5, 7, and 8 have the most cruft/unneeded sections. All the others could use some cleanup, too. –Llama mansign here 02:03, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Mario Party 5 seems to have the most unencyclopeic content. I removed the list of minigames once, but someone put it back. –Llama mansign here 15:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

3RR
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.--Wildnox(talk)
 * Yeah, I do apologize for that. I got carried away, and completely forgot the 3RR. I was discussing the issue all the while, but it was kinda like banging my head against a brick wall. Sorry again. Gene S. Poole  04:13, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

To answer your question, I had already placed a warning on the anonymous user's talk page that s/he was in danger of violating the rule, yet they still continued to revert- when I mentioned it on the article's talk page, you stopped. I had originally mentioned your name in my report, but it seems redundant to mention other parties involved, when the article's history does that much more clearly. --  Sarrandúin  [ Talk +  Contribs  ] 06:25, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I replied on your page because I'm not sure if you had this page watched or not; for posterity's sake, I'm mentioning that I replied on your talk page. Otherwise this unreplied note will bug me until the end of forever. Gene S. Poole  06:43, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I've been keeping an eye on it by watching my contributions page. However, I'll be signing off in just a moment, and hoping something or another will have happened by the time I come back. By the way, you missed the conversation disappearing, so I've reverted your most recent edits to the talk page- I think it's easiest for others to see what's happened if everything is still there, yes? --  Sarrandúin  [ Talk +  Contribs  ] 06:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I did notice; but I wasn't sure if reverting the talk page would be a strike against me, thought it best not to push my luck tonight. I did note the evidence afterwards under "Vandalism of Talk Page", however. Gene S. Poole  06:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Bowser
Please learn to read before you decide to demean me. I moved King Bowser to Bowser (Nintendo). The move back, not by me, caused the double redirects. I changed every redirect, which takes a long time, even with AWB. Furthermore, if there's a issue, then fix it yourself instead of wasting my and your time. ' (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 04:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * You're clearly not reading. I moved "King Bowser" to "Bowser (Nintendo)". As in, the name changed from "King Bowser" to "Bowser (Nintendo)". By me. Then somebody else moved it from "Bowser (Nintendo)" to "King Bowser", creating the double redirect. I don't care for your idea that I shouldn't bother if I can't do everything. That's quite against the point of Wikipedia. '  (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 04:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I realize I was being too harsh and I apologize. I've been in a foul mood today, and shouldn't have lashed out to you for something so minor. ' (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 04:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion
I'll switch to that userbox right away, as it looks like it definitely suits me better. Thank you. -- Luigi Maniac  14:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Yoshi
I don't appreciate the fact that you deleted the trivia section, but how am I supposed to "cite" my (and many others) suppositions? I didn't write anything not true, offensive, or break copyright laws. I am putting back the section. Game-uh Cube

You Don't Know Me...
But I recognize you from a Gamecube newsgroup I used to read several years back. Does that newsgroup still exist, or has everybody moved on to a Wii newsgroup?Rickus Muller 17:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Nintendo Page Redesign
A new page design is being considered for the WikiProject Nintendo page. A rough draft can be viewed here. Please add all comments and thoughts to the discussion. From the automated, Anibot 22:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)