User talk:Generalboss3

Hi
Hi GB, thanks for explaining your reverting of my edits, but the only reason I did it was because I included the maps of the top 5 empires in order, that is all I did. You have taken the Chola Empire, which is listed as number twenty, and replaced it up with other maps, in two sections. I wanted to make the article look improved and concise in order, but it seems you like to mix it up a little. You could say I have been a guardian over that article, since I periodically check to see if anyone has vandalized it, and I try my best to fix it. So am not against or for your map replacing edits, and do not consider this a big deal. Therefore, I thank you for telling me about your recent edits. Wish you the best.--24.23.160.233 (talk) 09:15, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

annotated image
Not sure what happened here but I hid the link to the annotated image for now. It didn't look to good as the opening. Cheers. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 11:57, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: History of India
Your changes were reverted because they were not substantiated by the references that are used in the article. If you wish to make such changes (which were pretty drastic), you must find a reliable source to substantiate them, in keeping with Wikipedia's policy of no original rsearch.

Please continue this discussion on the article talk page. Regards, SBC-YPR (talk) 09:57, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
- Spaceman  Spiff  09:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Some thoughts on your recent edits
Hi! I notice you have just recently been making a number of edits in articles I have contributed to. While some of your edits are very welcome, some of them contain unsupported claims; two of which I particularly object to.

The first is that you refer to the Kushan Empire as an Indian Empire. Certainly, the Kushans conquered much of the northern part of the Indian subcontinent, but the empire originated in what is now Afghanistan and territories immediately to the north, and archaeological evidence has shown time and again that they maintained their control of these territories long after their push into India. Calling the Kushan Empire "Indian" is rather akin to calling the British Empire "Indian". So, where I find such claims I will remove them.

Secondly, you make the claim that the Kushan Empire was ruled from "capitals" in ancient India. I have dealt with this claim in detail on the Talk:Kushan Empire page.

If you do not agree with my comments and changes - please give your reasons on the Talk:Kushan Empire page. Sincerely, John Hill (talk) 22:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)