User talk:Generation Snowflake

June 2018
Hello, I'm Aspening. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Microaggression— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Aspening (talk) 22:41, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FuerWoW. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aspening (talk) 22:41, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Aspening (talk) 22:43, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at SQL. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: SQL was changed by Generation Snowflake (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.977969 on 2018-06-27T22:44:33+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 22:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User talk:Generation Snowflake, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is for talk page abuse. \\\Septrillion:- &#8237;  10 Eleventeen 22:55, 27 June 2018 (UTC)  Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. stwalkerster (talk) 23:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)