User talk:Generouscontributor

Nomination of The Skye for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Skye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Skye until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Comatmebro (talk) 13:42, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with The Skye. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 11:37, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ocean Dune


The article Ocean Dune has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable development"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 16:34, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beacon Towers (disambiguation) (August 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Otterathome was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beacon Towers (disambiguation) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Otterathome (talk) 19:34, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sakina Kamwendo


A tag has been placed on Sakina Kamwendo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.safm.co.za/sabc/home/safm/schedule/presenterprofiles/details?id=f49fb7b9-a472-4a8d-8075-004a46db0f82&title=Sakina+Kamwendo. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk)  12:59, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Please unblock me... Generouscontributor (talk) 07:38, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * You aren't blocked. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  08:14, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mud Monument
Hello Generouscontributor,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mud Monument for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:08, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mud Monument


A tag has been placed on Mud Monument requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Wayne Jayes (talk) 12:53, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Saw your post on Kudpung's talk. To elaborate, the belovedness of the thing by those who love it does not make it suitable for an article in encyclopedia. Subjects of encyclopedia articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. You may want to draft a new article, based on what has been written about the subject in WP:RS rather than personal knowledge, via the Article Wizard or WP:AfC. Hope this helps.Dlohcierekim (talk) 11:34, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fawzia Peer


The article Fawzia Peer has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Deputy mayor is not a notable post. No indication of being notable for anything else"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Azaadville
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Generouscontributor, thanks for creating Azaadville!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. PLease add categories and refernces section with {reflist}.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 08:36, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Darul Uloom Azaadville
Hello Generouscontributor,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Darul Uloom Azaadville for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Beacon Towers (disambiguation) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Beacon Towers (disambiguation), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Beacon Towers (disambiguation)


Hello, Generouscontributor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Beacon Towers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kingdom of Jad


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Kingdom of Jad, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:02, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Republic of Jad


A tag has been placed on Republic of Jad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Cahk (talk) 08:19, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Cahk (talk) 08:19, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Fawzia Peer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fawzia Peer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fawzia Peer& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep (talk) 09:45, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Musallatul Bahr
Hello Generouscontributor,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Musallatul Bahr for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

EROS message 07:19, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zahid Jadwat
Hello, Generouscontributor. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Zahid Jadwat, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Zahid Jadwat to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Edidiong (talk) 14:44, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Ahmad Sadeq Desai
Hello, Generouscontributor,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ahmad Sadeq Desai should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Ahmad Sadeq Desai.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Edidiong (talk) 14:51, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Zahid Jadwat for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zahid Jadwat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zahid Jadwat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edidiong (talk) 07:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Zahid Jadwat. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 19:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Kholvad House for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kholvad House is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kholvad House until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 2Joules (talk) 11:53, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Muhammad Al-Muqit moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Muhammad Al-Muqit, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:17, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ashraf Garda, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 04:52, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Red Desert (South Africa)
I have moved your article to draft space because it is not ready for article space. You need to: Deb (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) remove promotional wording
 * 2) add references from reliable sources

Disambiguation link notification for July 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Port Edward, KwaZulu-Natal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red Desert ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Port_Edward%2C_KwaZulu-Natal check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Port_Edward%2C_KwaZulu-Natal?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zahid Jadwat


A tag has been placed on Zahid Jadwat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Csgir (talk) 10:04, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 17:48, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Muhammad Al-Muqit


Hello, Generouscontributor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Muhammad Al-Muqit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 15:01, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Red Desert (South Africa)


Hello, Generouscontributor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Red Desert".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Cpt Viraj  (Talk)   05:56, 9 June 2019 (UTC)