User talk:Genesse23

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Genesse23, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Jokestress (talk) 06:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:47, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Rebecca Harding Davis
Thanks for notifying me. I have completed a more complete review of the article at Talk:Rebecca Harding Davis/GA1 with some specific questions about the work. You can edit the article directly in response to the questions or provide me with feedback on the Talk:Rebecca Harding Davis/GA1. maclean (talk) 04:14, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

GA status
You all have gotten some great feedback from the GA reviewer - - and it looks to me like you're very, very close to GA status. Congratulations! Now. . the final push. The two questions the reviewer raises that I might be able to help with: Life in the Iron Mills' status as pioneering document of realism; and, LIM's status within Davis's ouevre. For the first, you might look at the header notes for any Norton or Heath anthology of Am. Lit - - I have the Heath in my office, so remind me on Tuesday. Also, you might add this to your list of refs in re the claim about LIM in Davis's oeuvre: "Most readers agree that Life in the Iron Mills is Davis's best work." From Cecelia Techi, "Introduction: Cultural and Historical Background," Rebecca Harding Davis: Life in the Iron Mills, ed. Cecelia Tichi, NY: Bedfort St Martin's (1998). For certification of LiM's "pioneering" status: you might refer to RHD society page, the Heath Anthology page on Davis, the Legacy page on Davis, and Jean Pfaelzer's article in Legacy - - Legacy "LEGACY Profile: Rebecca Harding Davis, 1831-1910." Jean Pfaelzer. 7.2 (1990): 39-45. I think these two things - - LiM's "pioneering" status and its value w/i Davis's oeuvre - - are pretty much accepted as common sense within American lit. scholarship today. So, since it's pretty non-controversial - - it's going to be hard to find an article or writer explicitly arguing for or against these judgements. I think the best thing to do is to represent the ubiquitous status of these judgements, e.g. how they reflect the common sense of the discipline.

The other items/recommendations look fairly straightforward. Correct them and I think you'll clinch the GA status prize.

Congrats on your hard work! A job well-done.