User talk:Genet Ducame

Welcome!
Hello, Genet Ducame, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Genet Ducame, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 17:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Genet Ducame


A tag has been placed on User:Genet Ducame, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 17:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC)


 * read: Notability modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 17:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (Dear [Name of Administrator],

I am writing to contest the speedy deletion of the article titled [Article Title] on Wikipedia. I believe that the deletion request was not justified due to the following reasons:

Lack of Proper Assessment: The article was seemingly deleted without a thorough evaluation of its content and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines. It is crucial to consider the article's potential for improvement and expansion before opting for speedy deletion.

Significance and Notability: The subject matter covered in the article holds significant relevance and meets the criteria of notability outlined in Wikipedia's guidelines. The [Article Title] deserves a place on Wikipedia as it provides valuable information to readers and contributes to the knowledge base within its respective field.

Reliable Sources: The article is supported by credible and reliable sources, including. These sources verify the factual accuracy and legitimacy of the information presented in the article, further establishing its credibility. While the article may currently be brief or incomplete, it possesses potential for further expansion and improvement. Instead of deleting it outright, it would be more appropriate to give editors the opportunity to enhance the article's content and address any concerns through the standard editing process.

Considering the aforementioned points, I kindly request a reconsideration of the decision to delete the [Article Title]. I believe that preserving the article aligns with Wikipedia's goal of providing comprehensive and reliable information to its readers.

Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. I look forward to a thoughtful re-evaluation of the deletion request.) --Genet Ducame (talk) 17:54, 27 June 2023 (UTC)


 * huh modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 12:13, 30 June 2023 (UTC)