User talk:Geneva11

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Geneva11! Thank you for your contributions. I am Doug Weller and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Doug Weller talk 09:18, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Johnson, Stan, and Polly Johnson. "Translating the Anthon Transcript"
Please don't add this again. The FARMS review trashes the book as inaccurate and making the false claim that Nibley endorsed it, we should definitely not use it for anything. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 13:02, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Horses
I'm guessing that you haven't actually read these sources, right? You need to read the sources yourself. We also have a policy called WP:Undue you need to read, as well as WP:REDFLAG. And I guess WP:FRINGE might help. Doug Weller talk 09:18, 25 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Considering this is Geneva11's first edit, I think it would be only fair to tone it down a little Doug. The discouraging and bold tone of your last 3 comments might be interpreted by a new Wikipedian as unwelcoming.


 * Geneva11, I would recommend editing non-religious articles for a while and getting a feel for how Wikipedia works. Don't let a few edit reverts discourage you from continued contribution. Dig Deeper (talk) 01:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Doug Weller talk 11:41, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

March 2019
When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Mesoamerican writing systems‎, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:
 * If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
 * If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
 * If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. ''There's no evidence that there is permission to post this copyright document. Please never add such links. '' Doug Weller  talk 17:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Anachronisms in the Book of Mormon. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 21:56, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Agave in Europe in 4th century BCE
Please see Talk:Agave. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:33, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Please don't add self-published sources
You did this at Pre-Columbian trans-oceanic contact theories - anything published by iUniverse should not be used. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 07:38, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Hillebrand, William "Adenostemma viscosum"
I need to see a quote from Hillebrand backing your claim that he thought it was an American species, as so far as I can see that's completely false. It's wrong in any case. Please show your source if you wish to continue editing as we can't have editors making up claims. Hopefully you'll have it to hand. Doug Weller talk 18:14, 29 August 2019 (UTC) Doug,  If you would like, I can scan the page from the hard copy book, but it is available on the web at https://archive.org/details/mobot31753003034128/page/192. If your question is whether Adenostemma viscosum is an American species it is right on Wikipedia at https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adenostemma_lavenia. Adenostemma lavenia is a synonym for Adenostemma viscosum https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=38718&print_version=PRT&source=to_print#null


 * Please see my post at WP:FTN. Hillebrand clearly says on the page you linked to that "The species is widely spread over the Americas, Polynesia, N. Australia, Asia, and Africa.” He makes no claim it is only found in America, and you can see in my FTN post and the edit I made tonight before I deleted it all that it is widespread and spread by birds. Doug Weller  talk 20:48, 29 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Yes, the point is that the plant is native to the Americas (as stated also in Wikipedia), so (ignoring for the moment the bird argument) in order to arrive in Hawaii (or any of those other places Hillebrand mentions) prior to European contact, there would need to have been contact with the Americas. So it is not a fringe theory as it is substantiated by fairly solid biological identification in Hawaii prior to European contact.  That particular Wiki page has as it's specific title that all material there are theories. On the bird distribution, I did not run across that article when I did a cite and topic search on the scientific databases I use, so it was definitely a good catch by you and should rightly be cited as a possible alternate explanation for the dispersion of that species.Geneva11 (talk) 21:27, 29 August 2019 (UTC)


 * We don't have an article that says it's native to the Americas? The Spanish article you link to says that lavinia originates in America, but the link you put on my talk page clearly states "Jurisdiction/Origin: 	Hawaii, Native". I don't understand why you are sending me a reliable source that contradicts the Spanish Wikipedia article. This clearly shows viscosum as introduced to - well, not the Americas, a small part of Central America.
 * Worse, you made it appear that Hillebrand said it was native to the Americas. I've wasted a lot of time on this and you still have only shown me a useless Wikipedia article and an website that says it's native to Hawaiil. Please ping me when you reply or better yet reply at WP:FTN. Thanks. Doug Weller  talk 08:25, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm also wondering why you chose es.wiki, as de.wiki says "The size of the species Adenostemma lavenia is handled differently: while the "Flora of China" emanates from a widespread in Southeast Asia, other authors designate only the plants occurring in Sri Lanka as Adenostemma lavenia and separate the remaining Southeast Asia the species Adenostemma tinctorium and adenostemma viscosum from." I'll also point out that both horse and camel are native to North America, although neither was there in the Holocene. Doug Weller  talk 08:57, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

FRINGE concepts
Could you read over WP:FRINGE.-- Moxy 🍁 20:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anthon Transcript, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia College ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Anthon_Transcript check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Anthon_Transcript?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Geneva11, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Angel Moroni have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

You need to be much more careful about sources and original research
You've used a website which is run by someone who has a small home business. Not a reliable source at all. The other scientific source doesn't seem to say anything about windows, so this was WP:Synthesis and also not allowed. Doug Weller talk 17:46, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Another one
You didn't even bother to source your edit about horses, mentioning an old journal in your edit summary. You don't even mention an article, let alone details. What do you know about it that makes you think it's a reliable source to use to contradict the other sources? Doug Weller talk 19:37, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Please don't use Jerry D. Grover as a source
As User:FyzixFighter said, he's self-published. Worse, he has no expertise in linguistics, he's a civil engineer and geologist. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 13:57, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jaredite kings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shule.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Mirrors in Mesoamerican culture into Anachronisms in the Book of Mormon. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 11:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Historicity of the Book of Mormon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)