User talk:Genghis1207

Welcome
Hello Genghis1207 and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Lithium-ion battery, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ; this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 01:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * First of all, your edit was unclear. "Due to these issues the cycle life of silicon anodes is challenging", that's unclear. Second, don't just go and revert without at least an explanation. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Help me!
We were looking forward to contributing to wikipedia. I was mid-way writing more content around battery safety and second life recycling of batteries as outlined from recent Tesla reports which is 100% right and correct (absolutely feel free to check the citations if saved) - however due to the deletion of my previously saved contribution, with exceptionally poor rationale from the person responsible and a borderline infantile attitude; who I am sure is in no way a battery expert and struggles to read scientifically correct english that has been published with amongst the most notable figures in the field; I am no longer going to contribute and neither recommend other professors from our institution who wanted to carry out this endeavour jointly.

Please help me with... best of luck, and no point in contributing scientifically correct data from our institute to this, we will share in better avenues and eventually some data will filter to the public domain a few years later,

genghis1207 Genghis1207 (talk) 02:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * As soon as you say "our institute", other editors are going to suspect REFSPAM. When you use the pronoun "we" in your comments, other editors are going to think shared account. Yes, the Wikipedia project wants to have current and correct information. What it is suspicious of is someone pushing their own efforts in a way that seems like undue attention. There is an essay directed at prospective contributors with expertise at expert editors. You should read it to better understand why your efforts were not welcomed in quite the manner you might have wanted.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 03:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Help me!
unfortunately ~— jmcgnh~ there was no use of pronouns etc in the contribution. It was only used in the explanation and in this page however NOT original. Neither was I able to complete the addition before it was taken down (I managed to add only a tiny contribution), there is no point in me writing items and have them taken down before I have completed it nor logged out. I hope you can understand why that is disparaging. I am >60 years old and obviously to try and not the easiest tool with an attitude is not encouraging, obviously you must encounter spammers which elicits the regrettable fortitude displayed. Unfortunately you did not appear to understand what I wrote or misunderstood the distinction between items. Nevermind.....

Please help me with...

genghis1207 Genghis1207 (talk) 10:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry you haven't had a good experience- I encourage you to read some of the information and pages given to you above; we welcome editors who are experts in their fields, but everyone here must work collaboratively with each other to arrive at a consensus. You are welcome to discuss your proposed changes on the article talk page, and maybe all the editors who follow that article and yourself can reach an agreement as to how to proceed. 331dot (talk) 10:18, 3 December 2019 (UTC)