User talk:Geniac/Archive 9

Troy86 SSP and maybe one other editor
Hello Geniac. I notice that you tagged User:Skanter for sockpuppetry with this edit last July. His name has been mentioned in the above case about Troy86. It is unclear whether Skanter should be added to the case, or if he is merely a bystander and others are trying to get him in trouble. Would welcome any insight you can provide from your earlier experience. EdJohnston (talk) 03:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Category:Articles with topics of unclear notability from June 2007
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Articles with topics of unclear notability from June 2007, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Articles with topics of unclear notability from June 2007 is used solely by a template that has been deleted (CSD C3). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Articles with topics of unclear notability from June 2007, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Night of the Living Dead
Thank you for spotting my non-sense edit, which I based on my experience that "recent" cult films are never in the public domain, without double checking. I'll be more careful with screenshots in the future. – sgeureka t•c 08:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikicleaner
Hi, in this edit you introduced a link to Georgia, which is a disambiguation page and should not be linked to. The correct link for the U.S. state is Georgia (U.S. state). I have noticed several editors using Wikicleaner do the same thing lately. DuncanHill (talk) 10:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * In fact, having looked more closely at that edit, please read WP:R2D, and stop misusing automated tools to "fix" redirects which are not broken. Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 12:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Userpage image
Why is this constantly being removed from both my userpage and talkpage? It's getting very annoying and there seems to be nothing wrong with the image. Vileplume's Narcotics factory  Wanna get high? 04:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay then.  Vileplume's Narcotics factory   Wanna get high? 04:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Use of (disambiguation) redirects
Regarding this edit: These (disambiguation) redirects exist and are used for a reason--to indicate an intentional link to a disambiguation page. When editors are disambiguating erroneous incoming links to dab pages that do not have the (disambiguation) clarifier, they know that the pages linked through the (disambiguation) redirect are intentional and do not require fixing. (Dab pages with the (disambiguation) clarifier, understandably, rarely if ever have mistaken incoming links.) So please don't repair these redirects when they appear in hatnotes, on other dab pages, or in any other context where a deliberate link to the dab page is intended. Cheers! -- Shelf Skewed  Talk  05:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Zaiger
I'm friends with the guy irl, he said it'd be fine if I posted it. Sorry if it caused any trouble. Vileplume's Narcotics factory  Wanna get high? 03:50, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Bot welcoming
I was wondering, why doesn't Wkipedia have a bot that automatically welcomes new users (instead of posting the message when they've done a bad edit)? I've noticed that other wikis, even Encyclopedia Dramatica, have used them (Mysterybot is theirs), so I'm surprised we haven't done this yet. Vileplume  卐 05:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Presales
Hi, You have removed my link from presales page the link is www.presaleswiki.com, please do not remove links for the sake of it, presaleswiki.com is a wiki and gives much more detailed information about presales as a subject, it is an open wiki. I am sure it complies with all guidelines on the wikipedia, if such a open platform does not meet the guidelines then i suppose that the other links on the page also do not. I would appericiate if you could atleast bother to have a look at the website before deleting the link. Hope you understand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.241.106.73 (talk) 08:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I have responded at Talk:Presales. --Geniac (talk) 00:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

links on presales
Hi,

I was hoping to see a response to my earlier query regarding my earlier post reg www.presaleswiki.com. This is a gentle reminder. I would like to re-itterate that presales wiki is an open WIKI for the community and is not like other links provided on the page.

Hope you are considerate enough 59.94.105.122 (talk) 16:15, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I have responded at Talk:Presales. --Geniac (talk) 00:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi,

I understand and appericiate your efforts but let me mention that presaleswiki is the only wiki related to presales on the web rather it is the only website solely ment for presales professionals. I hope you will understand the situation. Our idea is not to develop traffic but to develop a place for presales folks, where they can contribute, we truly follow the spirit of wikipedia. Please consider as a humble request to keep the link. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.241.106.73 (talk) 04:23, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * If you want to re-add the link, discuss it at Talk:Presales. --Geniac (talk) 04:28, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi,

I have put in the comment on presales talk page 121.241.106.73 (talk) 12:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Bobbi Miller-Moro
Is up for deletion. --Tom 17:35, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Common green bottle fly
Sorry! I'm still getting the hands-on-hang of this and I want to make sure it's as neat as possible. I will take your suggestion into heavy consideration in the future. Aemejia22 22:07, 20 March 2009 (CST)

Thanks
For the welcome! You are very kind. I look forward to more of your suggestions in the future. :) Nanayaagh (talk) 14:36, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

How do I

 * Merge the article, then ? Thanks for the suggestion. Nanayaagh (talk) 08:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for your input on the Lucilia silvarum page. Cassiegz (talk) 04:15, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Cassiegz (talk)

Thank you
Thank you for your kind welcome and suggestions. I hope we can keep in touch and you can continue to offer helpful tips. --Likesausages (talk) 20:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Cover Good 2 Gr8.jpg

 * [copy of my own post to IndianCow]

I cant understand this..
As a book cover, the image is not replaceable by free content; any other image that shows the packaging of the book would also be copyrighted, and any version that is not true to the original would be inadequate for identification or commentary. -- IndianCow  Talk  20:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I've replied on your talk page. --Geniac (talk) 12:06, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Marketelligent
Please help me get a third party edit in the page. Although I am related with the team, but promotion or advertisement is not in my or companies interest. I have added the refrences from one of the leading Business daily of India to support the fact. Kindly help —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zishan86 (talk • contribs) 02:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

"I have added the refrences from one of the leading Business daily of India to support the fact." It supports the following facts, —Comment added by Zishan86 (talk • contribs) IST 08:15, 25 April 2009.(UTC)
 * Marketelligent was started in October 2007.
 * NSRCEL incubated Marketelligent to grow.
 * Gives the details and background of the founders.
 * Gives the brief of service areas of the company.
 * gives the hint of the startup buzz in India.

Guess who's back!
Guess who's back? It's me! Since you were one of the people who blocked me, I decided to ask you: if I now make an account, will I get blocked right away again because of my earlier associations with vandalism? If so, then at least I know, right, so that would be great. :) 86.89.146.118 (talk) 15:16, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, you gave me three possible scenarios, I'm cool with number three: it is the only one which will allow me to continue editing. The reason I got my account blocked in the first place was, not because of any vandalism, but rather because I "assumed" I had a right for a fresh new start, only if I admitted to having been a sockpuppeteer. Since my IP still hadn't changed (it still hasn't :)) I was banned right away - it still linked to the previous accounts of which some had been used for vandalism. So I was blocked almost right away! Seems a bit strange to me. 86.89.146.118 (talk) 05:16, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I reblocked this IP address as a serial sockpuppeteer and sneaky vandal (making it look every time again as if he or she is a useful contributor, but inserting nonsense and vandalism inbetween). I think it is better if we consider him or her as banned and save us all the trouble. He was blocked after the last IP block as User talk:Angela from the Blue, User talk:Divine Wodan, User talk:Jouke Bersma, ... so it's not as if he behaved perfectly until now. Fram (talk) 07:39, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The editor is also blocked for a year as the IP User talk:193.172.170.26 for the same reasons (also a static IP, just like this one). All these blocks were for vandalism, despite claims to the contrary. Fram (talk) 12:13, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Oijuy née Qwertgb
Note to other me: main me just re-blocked as being a sockpuppet of. Sorry you got dragged into his mania, but regardless I would like to thank you for your help! Oh, and remember to call your wife to find out where we are taking the kids on Saturday. Thanks, — Kralizec! (talk) 12:11, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

repairing Disambig ...
Please check this edit of yours. It didnt work properly and broke the template .some Wikicleaner bug ? --  Tinu  Cherian  - 10:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

thank you
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I noticed someone was modifying the page inserting claims that they had been the priest that denied me communion or claiming that I was otherwise subject to discipline within the Church. My faith is important to me and as a consequence I have been watching the page and trying to keep matters orderly and verifiable. I believe all present factual statements to be true and sourced in keeping with Wikipedia standards -- let me know if more is needed in order to resolve the notice. The two photos are mine and now in the public domain. Have I now indicated the (c) correctly? GFDL. Thank you for taking the time to keep the page professional and neutral in tone; I am most grateful, and fully recognize that it is not my place be the principal correspondent, save to challenge the completely untrue. Cordially, DKmiec —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkmiec (talk • contribs) 04:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

A follow up to your kind instruction
In this technological world folks like me who try to assemble devices without reading the instructions can be dangerous to themselves and others. No excuses, but this is how I find myself behind the learning curve on wikipedia's entirely intelligent standard of neutrality, which as I noted above, I am grateful for your service in bringing to my attention. Quite frankly before your note, I thought it was up to me to correct the occasional vandals who would ransack the facts, without realizing my own vanity then would likely err in the opposite direction. May I then ask one additional favor? I would be most grateful if you would take personal custody of the page, ensuring its tonal and substantive fairness so as to properly resolve any open dispute and thereby eliminate the legends on the page. I, of course, trust your judgment completely, leaving as much or as little of the page as your standards of complete fairness and evenhandedness warrant.

With gratitude for your assistance in this, Dkmiec —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkmiec (talk • contribs) 19:23, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Greetings... and request
Greetings Geniac. You recently blocked User talk:24.191.62.3 but they/he/she is/are back vandalising. Could you please...? Cheers!--Technopat (talk) 18:09, 30 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Greetings Geniac. Thanks for your prompt reply. The image had been up for a couple of years with that (erroneous) date and instead of going to the original source I went to the user talk page and jumped to the wrong conclusion based on the track record. Sorry you were troubled. BTW, how do I apologise to an anonymous editor for my false accusation of vandalism? --Technopat (talk) 18:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Whats Up
Why do you have a problem with me. --Mr. Unknown (talk) 13:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC) --Mr. Unknown (talk) 22:11, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * the IP address Im currently using is receving new message from you concerning me from you. this is the second time I am reciving it from you. IP Address is 68.192.226.130.

Template:Infobox Philippine municipality
I did what I did on to that template because it looks a though some images tend to be in an unwanted location. 124.106.226.252 (talk) 22:23, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Questions re citation form and other matters
I have a question regarding the proper form of citation. I cite articles in this format: Is this the proper format? I have seen folks use different ones including lots of half pipes. Thanks for any insight you can offer.

Also, another minor question I have is when I make a minor edit do I have to sign with four tildes when I am logged in? It looks like my name appears anyway.

Last question: how do I get Wikipedia to email me when changes are made to a page that I am watching?

Thank you again! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Likesausages (talk • contribs) 14:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Plutonium Star
Hi

I have given you Plutonium Star as your contributions are over 40,000 edits. Cheers!

Lamro (talk) 09:17, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Super Nanny
Oh, sorry. My mistake. I didn't feel that the image was right for to article, but I guess I was supposed to start a discussion about it first. It's just that I didn't think that the opening screens from international versions of the show were usually used in the infobox? Shouldn't it be the original, or nothing at all? Thanks Zestos (talk) 02:09, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm. I've checked the website. That seems to be a site for the UK and US version of the show. The UK version wouldn't have featured the British flag and probably wouldn't have made the Mary Poppins connection. Obviously, that's a theme that's being used to market it to an American audience. I've had a look on channel4.co.uk - the website of the channel that it first aired on - and found that they have the UK version available On Demand (http://www.channel4.com/programmes/supernanny/4od). I checked the first episode and found that, as I said, they didn't use this logo. (Here's a screenshot of the UK opening "logo": http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v221/002994/supernannyuk.jpg) I also checked the last episode of the UK version and that doesn't feature the US intro/logo either (Image: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v221/002994/supernannyuk2.jpg). That being said, after looking at the website that you suggested, it seems that the US series is supposed to be seen as an official continuation of the UK series. Personally, I don't think that any logo should be included. Would you be happy to take this to the article's discussion page? Zestos (talk) 02:53, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * :::: Haha, its cool. What do you think then? Is the US version supposed to be a continuation of the British version, or is it a series in its own right? If its a continuation, then *maybe* that logo should be used. It would probably be easier just to have no image. I'm not all that fussed to be honest, but I like to think that the English language Wikipedia is for all speakers of English - not just Americans - so there shouldn't be any obvious American 'biases'. I see that you're Australian, so you may agree with me =P Zestos (talk) 19:09, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Ganguli
The sources are all in the external links already added on the page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.170.77.148 (talk) 23:58, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

On Opinoso

Hi

Thanks for your contributions. It was an outburst after I realized that Opinoso (a foreigner) has been controlling Brazilian related themes at wikipedia, and he has bullied Brazilians (check the history of his posts, some are contributive, but in most cases he bullies Brazilian posters). Opinoso claims to be Brazilian, but he is not, he is definitely a liar. And he is heavily biased.

Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by WielandDerSchmitzFreiheit (talk • contribs) 14:24, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Trim, County Meath
Hi, I notice you reverted this deletion of text, but I don't think the paragraphs merit keeping so I'm removing them. Thanks  Nelson50 T  11:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

bot error
Hi Geniac. Thanks for teh message it's proved instructive. The file has been picked up through deep mining of Category:Comics terminology. Sorry about that. I cast the net too wide, I hadn't realised other projects categorised images differently to us. I'll adjust accordingly. Hiding T 16:31, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Forever
Just a novice wiki user, trying to help out - I added infobox, copyright, and fair use rational to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Damage-forever-front.jpg - is that enough to fix the issues? 81.149.182.210 (talk) 03:56, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Note
Hi Geniac, I am a new user so I am not sure if this is how you post on a wall (This seems to be the way you did it on mine)

Here is the source that quotes Peter Hinwood as being a nude model: http://www.amazon.ca/Naked-Men-Too-Liberating-1950-2000/dp/0789303965

Here are some NSFW pictures of Peter Hinwood before RHPS:

http://www.stars-masculines-nues.com/hinwood.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.32.191 (talk • contribs) 00:28, November 1, 2009

consent to use china entercom company logo.jpg
Hi Geniac, This is Chinaentercom. Thank you for your message. The problem I have now is regarding the image I uploaded - China entercom company logo.jpg, which you found lack of supporting licenses. The image was provided by a current marketing representative of China Entercom, who gave me permission to use this logo in this context. Please give me instructions on what steps must I take to resolve this problem. Thank you for your assistance. Chinaentercom —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chinaentercom (talk • contribs) 08:47, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Ownership of articles
Good night, my friend. I received your message but unfortunately I didn't understand it. Do you believe that I am acting as I own an article? Kind regards, --Lecen (talk) 02:01, 10 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your suggestion in Lecen's Talk Page. I have many times complained about article ownership in articles related to Brazilian demography; the other editor seems to have a de facto veto power on these. But my complaints have never been taken in serious. It seems that Wikipedia doesn't have any real procedure to enforce the rule against ownership. Ninguém (talk) 11:21, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Wow
I had been threatening to start a death project about a year ago - well done!! I am very very impressed! have just about joined - I have a very very large amount of tagging i would like to do to tie in a huges range of categories - I would appreciate if you could email me sometime - at your leisure - cheers SatuSuro 09:25, 15 December 2009 (UTC) Have started tagging - dan masih banyak category dan artikel untuk dapat proyek lebih besar - mudah mudahan atau inshallah - bisa sebelum tahun baru proyek membuat better. Tempat saya di Java banyak tahun lalu dekat Yk (Yogya). Bahasa campur aside - thanks for your support - please feel free to offer suggests or criticisms - we will need a portal sooner than later as well :) cheers atau selamat malam SatuSuro 04:43, 16 December 2009 (UTC)  oh dear a lonnie person of origin - I lived in Queenstown some time in the very very very distant past - tassie, java and now the death project - oh well i still live on oz - but my head is still in damascus and budapest from a recent trip - cheers SatuSuro 04:47, 16 December 2009 (UTC)