User talk:Geniescience

helmets / bicycle: i'll start a rebuild by rewriting from scratch. The article can grow. The article does not need to be long. People can add a little more to it. I submit to the crowd that my rewrite is a balanced beginning. I encourage everyone to add small sections that they can justify. Everyone's goal is to keep it clear and concise. There is no need to add the same content that is already available in another article, so please refrain from doing that.

Attempting to rewrite it from its current position would require 100 hours to read all the references. Those who know the references are best suited to add some of them back into the article.
 * preceding text presumably added by Geniescience.


 * May I suggest that you get consensus for such a drastic pruning before doing the pruning; also consider doing it in smaller stages with discussion at each stage.  As an example of rewriting an article, I'm well on the way to almost a complete rewrite of Bicycle gearing, but have done it in small stages over a period of several months with lots of added references Murray Langton (talk) 18:11, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

The "white elephant in the room" is not present in your case of bicycle gearing. If I describe the white elephant in any one way or another, it may cause anger and difficulty. I hope that this is clear.
 * preceding text presumably added by Geniescience.

Please sign your posts, even on your own talk page, so other editors can see who said what and when. I note that you appear to have breached the '3 reverts in 24 hours rule', and that at least four different editors disagree with your actions. Murray Langton (talk) 21:51, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi from Wikimania
Hi, Eran (talk) 17:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)