User talk:GenoV84/2020/August

Hi, might you please help me? I saw a few time ago you did contributed to Hate group page, but someway I do not understand all my edits were removed.
I tried to make from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_group to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hate_group&oldid=974291539, because neither SPLC nor my education supports the point of view hatred are only about old nazis, but after that article was protected.

After that, I tried to do Talks: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hate_group#Our_#Wikipedia_is_not_one's_Political_Instrument and some talks to some thematic & admins channels

You look like a more expirienced English Wiki guru, may you please advise me something? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9E01:740:A4A5:22F0:4853:5FB3 (talk) 06:43, 22 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi, sorry for being late. I saw your contributions to the article, I read your messages on the Talk page and I understand your point of view, but the fact remains that you can't just delete and remove informations or sources which you don't agree with, since this kind of behavior qualifies as disruptive editing on Wikipedia, even if your intentions are good; that's why your edits were reverted. The best advice I can give you is to propose your suggestions on the Talk page; also, in order to improve the article, you need to provide reliable sources for everything that you write, without deleting other people's contributions, unless someone writes something that qualifies as blatantly false, original research, unverifiable and/or unsupported by reliable sources (for a more exhaustive summary, see What Wikipedia is not). The best practice is to research the most reliable sources on the topic and summarize what they say in your own words, with each statement in the article attributable to a source that makes that statement explicitly. Source material should be carefully summarized or rephrased without changing its meaning or implication. Take care not to go beyond what is expressed in the sources, or to use them in ways inconsistent with the intention of the source, such as using material out of context. In short, stick to the sources.--GenoV84 (talk) 19:36, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Memorialism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Symbolic representation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)