User talk:Gentlegentlman

February 2018
Hello, I'm Mediatech492. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Richard Cromwell have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Please ensure your edits are properly supported by sources. Mediatech492 (talk) 23:51, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Commoner. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mediatech492 (talk) 05:17, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The rules for Wikipedia are clear, sources must be provided to support any edit. Your opinion on the importance of the subject is irrelevant. You may also want to review Wikipedia rules on neutral point of view and original research. Edits that are not in compliance with the rules are subject to removal. Have a good day. Mediatech492 (talk) 11:56, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Shellwood (talk) 12:01, 1 March 2018 (UTC)