User talk:GentlemanGhost/Archive 3

License tagging for Image:Basil_E_Frankweiler.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Basil_E_Frankweiler.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Actually, the image did have a copyright tag, but it was vandalized. I've now restored it. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Heat Wave (comics) and Heatwave (comics)
Good find - I've hatnoted them. (Emperor (talk) 03:45, 5 December 2008 (UTC))

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Masters of Evil headshots.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Masters of Evil headshots.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * This image was converted to PNG format (by someone else). I've marked the GIF version with a template instructing that it should be deleted in favor of the PNG version. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 19:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Big Wheel Marvel.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Big Wheel Marvel.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * This image was converted to PNG format (by someone else). I've marked the GIF version with a template instructing that it should be deleted in favor of the PNG version. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 19:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Skein.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Skein.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * This image was converted to PNG format (by someone else). I've marked the GIF version with a template instructing that it should be deleted in favor of the PNG version. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 19:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ringmaster.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ringmaster.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:45, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * This image was converted to PNG format (by someone else). I've marked the GIF version with a template instructing that it should be deleted in favor of the PNG version. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 19:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

RfA
I seem to recall that I've asked you about this before, but despite my (and others') efforts, you declined at the time.

Now that some time has gone by, I thought I'd ask again, to see if you could be persuaded to change your mind : )

So, would adminship be something you might be interested in?

While considering, you may wish to read WP:ADMIN, Administrators/Tools, and the overview at Administrators' reading list. - jc37 10:12, 12 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Still thinking? Or hoping that I'll forget I asked? : ) - jc37 10:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Heh. Still thinking. I haven't even read WP:ADMIN yet. :-) --GentlemanGhost (talk) 23:56, 17 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Grin
 * Fair enough : ) - jc37 10:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Ah, just do it. The tools are handy, and you don't have to let yourself get caught up in anything unless you want to get caught. I feel silly for not having accepted the nom earlier than I did. Doczilla  STOMP! 00:59, 19 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Yep. You might as well have the tools to hand when you need them. (Emperor (talk) 03:56, 19 December 2008 (UTC))

> Poke <



 * - jc37 06:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Swarm (comics).gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Swarm (comics).gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * This image was converted to PNG format (by someone else). I've marked the GIF version with a template instructing that it should be deleted in favor of the PNG version. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 20:56, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

transsexual women's slave names
I responded to your note on the talk page before I found your note on my talk page. Anniepoo (talk) 01:41, 16 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Either/or. I'll go check it out. Thanks! --GentlemanGhost (talk) 20:26, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

RFC Update
Thank you for endorsing one or more summaries in the RFC. Please note that two proposals have been put forward on how we can move on after the RFC: Casliber's proposal and Randomran's proposal. Please take the time to look over these proposals, and consider endorsing one of them, or writing one of your own. Thanks again for your participation! BOZ (talk) 03:38, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Sock puppet check
Thanks for the note. Seems like a good way to address this issue. I have added my support and thrown in more evidence and underlined my concerns about the size, scale and scope of the problem. We'll see how it goes. (Emperor (talk) 22:37, 19 December 2008 (UTC))


 * OK looks solid. I think there is a clear, ongoing WP:BLP violation and breaking of consensus, which has required numerous reversions. Which looks to tick the box for code C. I'll keep an eye on it and throw in my thoughts if needed. (Emperor (talk) 02:15, 20 December 2008 (UTC))

Heads up - There's a suspiciously related series of edits on the Zsuzsanna Budapest page. 168.58.212.202 reverts an edit by User:Hungarian_Friend who has previously added a large amount of material to the Budapest article. Oddly, this material seems to fit with our alleged sock puppet's obsessions and is described with their odd language pattern in the edit summary. Very strange. Anniepoo (talk) 05:01, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Could still be the same person trying to throw us off the scent. Or it could be someone else. Several of the sock puppets have been confirmed as coming from the IP address. Those that haven't were too old to be considered by the admins who do the user checks. I still need to check and see what follow-up actions were taken. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 09:58, 22 December 2008 (UTC)


 * OK, the IP address has been blocked for 6 months. Of course, they may show up on a different IP, but that should at least create some inconvenience in the short run. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 10:02, 22 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The talk page for the IP address in question User talk:164.58.212.202 contains the same info they were blocked for, linking a RL name to a wiki account.
 * This probably is counterproductive to the idea of preserving editor's identities.
 * I'm not overly concerned by this, but it seems to make the exercise moot.
 * Anniepoo (talk) 04:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Checkuser advice, part 2
Working independently from Emperor, I created a suspected sock puppet case for the user who Emperor was considering doing a CheckUser on. After reading further, it appears that an RFCU might be necessary as well, so I filed one here. This user appears to have been abusing sock puppets for over a year, so my notices are overly lengthy, but I hope that won't be cause for them to be ignored. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 01:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * At first glance, it looks fairly well-documented to me. (Having done a few of those myself, I know how much work they can be.) At this point, I guess we'll have to wait and see what the checkusers say. - jc37 12:33, 21 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Oops... When responding, I was looking at your first link, not the second. Looks like they agreed : ) - jc37 12:35, 21 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Yep, they did. Thanks for your help! --GentlemanGhost (talk) 10:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Crystal Fractal Comics
I am responding late to the Prod deletion as part of the comics program to delete the Crystal Fractal Comics page...

I wanted to see if it can be "legitimized" and undeleted...

Some of the recent real references (i.e. not just press releases) are:

http://www.thenewspaper.ca/index.cfm?pagepath=the_archives&id=8572&modeX=BlogID&modeXval=A8D17399-C8E7-F06A-4AC4C1C5E697E1DD&BlogID=A8D17399-C8E7-F06A-4AC4C1C5E697E1DD&action=showcomments - an article in the Toronto Published "the newspaper" (this is the online version)

and

http://www.snapdowntowntoronto.com/display/68421/1464/ - an article by SNAP (a local Toronto newspaper)

One of the key reasons for adding this page is the company is the only publishing company based in Canada at this time taking proposals -- aside from wom from comic stores... this has not been proven... but in the process of seeing if this is true...

The article was written as a request from readers who wanted to see it listed on the "offical list of comic book publishers" page...

Let me know if that is in the right direction...

D. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dslennox (talk • contribs) 03:03, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Hey, G.G.
Happy New Year! Hope it's off to a good start. -- Tenebrae (talk) 01:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Mile High Comics logo.gif)
You've uploaded File:Mile High Comics logo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)


 * This image was converted to PNG format (by someone else). Feel free to delete the GIF version. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 19:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Hildebrandt-Greg and Tim.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hildebrandt-Greg and Tim.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Marcus Brute (talk) 01:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD on Cuisine of Dominica
The article, Cuisine of Dominica has been nominated for deletion as being non-notable. You can participate in the discussion here. --Jeremy ( Blah blah... ) 03:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Nice user page
Thought I hadn't seen you red linked name in my watchlist for a while. Now I know why. You better have one of these, thinking about it:

Take it easy, Hiding T 11:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the barnstar!


 * As for my new user page, I had originally avoided creating one because I felt that it really wasn't that important who I am. The work should stand on its own (or, for that matter, be reverted on its own). But, I have since discovered that there's a perception that having a red-linked username indicates that you are either a newbie or antisocial. Since neither of those qualities are true of me, I thought I'd better put together a userpage. :-)


 * The barnstar will make a nice addition to it.


 * --GentlemanGhost (talk) 19:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Ah, I never thought you were a newbie or antisocial, I just thought you were a ghost. But it's a nice userpage. I'm just disappointed your name doesn't light up on my watchlist anymore. ;( Hiding T 00:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Sergio Aragones pic
Did you go to WonderCon also? -- Broken Sphere Msg me 00:00, 4 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Yep. But, I could only make it on Sunday. I had Sergio sign the anniversary Groo issue. :-) --GentlemanGhost (talk) 00:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)


 * People I know are now telling me that they went after I posted some pics on my Facebook. Went there and took photos to upload to Commons, only bought one thing.  Saturday was good because that was when they had the movie panels.   Broken Sphere Msg me 00:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I went to some of the panels, which were good, if not great. Other than that, I spent most of my time in Artists' Alley chatting up anyone who worked on the comics of my formative years. I also only bought one item. From what I hear, that was a common theme this year. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 00:19, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Bad girl art
Please join the discussion on this article you have contributed to. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 18:55, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo Destiny Episode I: Worlds Apart
Just a heads up, the creator of Neo Destiny Episode I: Worlds Apart removed the prod tag so I took it to afd. On a side note, you can't help but wonder if somewhere there exists a page which offers advice on how best to describe your product in the Wikipedia... Hiding T 21:12, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks! And, yes, it would nice if there was an advice page like that. I assume that it's something you could put on your user page, although I have come across editors who feel that even the user page should only be used for information pertinent to Wikipedia. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 03:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * No problem. Yeah, the user page is really only for information pertinent to Wikipedia, but we tend to cut slack to people who contribute. There needs to be some sort of fine balance found. I don;t know what that balance is though. Hiding T 11:33, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Notability of residential colleges
You previously commented at WikiProject Colleges & Universities about the notability of college/university residences and other campus buildings. A RFC has been submitted on the best way to deal with the existence of many Wikipedia articles on residence halls and dormitories at colleges and universities that may not be notable. Your input and feedback would be appreciated at the RFC. Madcoverboy (talk) 23:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Consensus test on university topics
You previously commented on the RFC on the notability of residences at colleges and universities. A consensus test has been posted to evaluate what, if any consensus, has been reached on the issue. Please go and comment at: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Universities. Madcoverboy (talk) 18:08, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello
Just wanted to say Hi, after having passed my recent Request for adminship. How's everything going?

I don't know how much you've looked into the comics project's GA drive; so far, we have been successful in the last few months with Spider-Man, Spider-Man: One More Day, Silver Age of Comic Books, Alex Raymond, Winnie Winkle, LGBT themes in comics, Hergé, and Pride & Joy (comics).

I think I've seen you around the D&D project as well, so I'd like to point out to you the success we've had there: Gary Gygax, Wizards of the Coast, Dragons of Despair, Drizzt Do'Urden, Forgotten Realms, Tomb of Horrors, Dwellers of the Forbidden City, White Plume Mountain, The Lost Caverns of Tsojcanth, Expedition to the Barrier Peaks, Planescape: Torment, Dragonlance, and Against the Giants, and we plan to hit Dave Arneson and Drow (Dungeons & Dragons) after some work. :) BOZ (talk) 17:56, 18 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm doing well, thank you. Congratulations on your adminship! I haven't been around much lately, but as time permits, I'll try to help with the GA candidates. :-) --GentlemanGhost (talk) 00:14, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks. :) Just keep an eye on both wikiproject talk pages from time to time, as I post updates regularly. :) BOZ (talk) 19:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey there. :) Just wanted to let you know that I just added a bunch of comics articles needing assessment on the Marvel Comics work group page; if you're still doing that. :) BOZ (talk) 22:58, 7 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I haven't done those for a while - I've been concentrating on the backlist of all comics articles which have not been assessed. I'll probably do a few once in a while, though. :-) --GentlemanGhost (talk) 23:52, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You'll find most of those in the backlog eventually anyway. :) BOZ (talk) 00:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks...
...for calling out the outing attempt just now. Your edits set off a vandalism alarm, which brought it to my attention so I could get an oversighter to remove those revisions from the history. I've given that user a slightly sterner warning, and will be keeping a closer eye on them from now on. Thanks again. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 01:19, 27 June 2009 (UTC)


 * No, if you ever see another instance of outing or posting of private information like that, it's best not to post about it much on-wiki, as you don't want it to spread out further than it needs to. The best thing to do is to contact the oversighters (their email is on WP:OS) and let them take a look at it. Quickly removing it as you did helps as well, as then it at least isn't on the live version of the page. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 01:34, 27 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Will do. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 01:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Rachel Pollack battle history
Hey, Wraithkind has just pulled some chunks out of the anti sock puppet discussion out of talk:Rachel_Pollack   While I understand the motivation of protecting privacy, in this case it conflicts with the utility of having a history that the page has been the target of a persistent vandal. I'm asking you to look at it since you're more experienced than I. [the diff] Anniepoo (talk) 04:59, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

The account is a SPA, it's an odd edit for a SPA, the other edit fits the vandal's pattern marginally. Wonder if our blocked editor is back? Anniepoo (talk) 05:36, 27 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Could be. I've reverted the change. I'll keep an eye on it. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 18:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I think our blocked editor is definitely back. They erased much of the search for them from the Rachel Pollack discussion page. Anniepoo (talk) 17:56, 18 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I was just dropping in to point this out - especially ironic given your last words from the block of discussion the anon IP blanked . (Emperor (talk) 01:32, 19 December 2009 (UTC))


 * Heh. Well, it would have been nice to be proven wrong. I'll take a look. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 07:22, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Obamacomic
Thanks for the help on Barack Obama (comic character). My concern about COI comes simply from the fact that it's to my advantage (as the writer of Licensable BearTM and the publisher of About Comics) that this page continues to exist and document that mine was the first Obama comic. As such, taking a step to document notability serves my own nefarious goals. Nat Gertler (talk) 20:13, 14 July 2009 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. And that may be true, but it's such a roundabout way of doing it that only the strictest rules lawyer would accuse you of self-promotion. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 20:19, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Please do not accuse me of harrassment
You are incorrect sir. I did not "Out" anyone. The editor in question simply states openly who he is with his image, as I do. It would have absolutely nothing to do with the article, if the editor was not the subject who created the page. That is not outing.

The image the editor kept reverting back, shows that the editor has indeed openly Credited himself. Discovering this mad it clear that the user has a conflict of interest as the founder of the theatre in question and the subject of the article he created. I can be blunt and that dos not always read well on screen, but I am not harrassing this user.--Amadscientist (talk) 20:52, 20 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, I feel that I should not go "Over board" in bringing this to the attention of other editors. (although I would have to think that is subjective to each editor) Not just because the user has not choosen to place his name on his user page, as that does not mean he did not intend to be attributed for his actual work.( I removed my name from my page, but continue to return to older images and place my name on the "Sharealike" image in order to keep anyone from claiming or crediting my images improperly. Which McClatchy Newspaper had done online). I did not actualy discover for certain untill after the users ban when I was looking at the upload page for the Forest Theatre image. I was not attempting to use his absense to push things through. The AFD will give the user time to return and still add input.


 * I edit openly and honestly about biographical information and subjects I am directly linked to. My edits during the Proposition 9 controversy in regards to an Artistic Director I was directly involved with were neutral and I kept an eye open for vandalism and accusations against someone I was personally upset with. It is a learning experience and actually helped me to understand the importance of neutral prose and the seriousness of issues in regards to living people. So I have purposely not edited any further on all of the pages during the AFD process, and have not taken this to Admin notice board for a very simple reason. We are encouraged to deal with issues ourselves first. I have communicated with the user as much as I could and only brought this to attention on the article talk page of the two articles that are effected where I was involved, at the Project Biography talk page, the AFD discussion and my own userpage. There was a required link to another project during the AFD process that I think was simply California and then there was a link placed to the AFD discussion to actors and performers that was either automated or placed by another editor. The creepy comment seems uncalled for but was the honest reaction at the time to the discovery and feeling a little used and dirty. Sorry, it is the truth. I wouldn't go that far on any other place and take full responsibility for how that makes me look.--Amadscientist (talk) 22:28, 20 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm glad that you are not intractable and still striving for neutral prose when you have a conflict with someone. I disagree that nominating a page for deletion while the original editor (and, alas, subject) is on a 3-day block is fair play, though. There's no rule against it, but to my mind, it's dirty pool. Theoretically, he could use that time to make adjustments to the article per suggestions that come up in the AfD. If the article isn't acceptable to the community after that, it will be eliminated. But now it's as if he's fighting with one hand tied behind his back. There should be trust placed in the Wikipedia community to get rid of that which Wikipedia is not; it is not necessary to handicap the offending editor to make that happen. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 02:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: Outing attempt
It looks as though some blocks have been placed already for the edit warring; if this still needs looking into, let me know, but keep in mind I'm not active during the day due to work. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 23:48, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. [] thanks,, Smatprt (talk) 00:27, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your reply about article rating. Richard75 (talk) 19:34, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Just getting back
Actually, it's a Dario Argento movie title...!

My apologies for not responding sooner; as you probably surmised from my contribution history, I've been away for several months. I plan to return to Wiki-editing regularly (if not often), and it's good to see some of my old and treasured colleagues still here fighting the good fight. With kudos and regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 00:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Request for your opinion
Hi. Can you join this discussion in order to offer us your thoughts? It would be most appreciated. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 06:34, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Marvunapp template
Good find! Now you've got a couple hundred or so articles to replace it on. ;) BOZ (talk) 13:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks! It seemed like it a worthy template to create. It may take a while to fill it in everywhere. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 13:48, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Assessing redirects
I found a way to do it by importing the list to Wikipedia and using a javascript tool to turn redirects green, then culling and using that list to assess in AWB. Another 79 articles knocked off. Hiding T 18:38, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Excellent! Nice work! --GentlemanGhost (talk) 01:00, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Tireless Contributor Barnstar

 * Thanks! --GentlemanGhost (talk)

Orphaned non-free image File:Front cover art for The Evil that Men Do.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Front cover art for The Evil that Men Do.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Zoo Fari  06:18, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Fixed. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 00:32, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello GentlemanGhost! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is an  Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Gail Greenwood -


 * Reference added. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 00:34, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Asgardian RFC closed, now at arbitration
Hello,

I am informing you that the recent RFC/U regarding Asgardian‎ has been closed, and the case is now at arbitration. You are neither required nor requested to participate, but you may view the initial statements for the case (please do not edit that page), and you may view the evidence presented and add more evidence if you wish, or simply follow the case. BOZ (talk) 04:10, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

brute
Your about the fifth person (third in the last 48 hours alone) who has contacted marcus brute about catagories, he has been asked to stop serveral times idk what to do with him. Weaponbb7 (talk) 00:52, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Radicalcomics red low res1.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Radicalcomics red low res1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:15, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


 * This image has been replaced by the current logo. Deletion is appropriate. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 00:31, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Front cover art for The Evil that Men Do.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Front cover art for The Evil that Men Do.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:04, 16 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Fixed. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 00:30, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Opinion request
Would you please weigh in at the Examples discussion at Talk:Fringe theory? Thank you. Tom Reedy (talk) 20:51, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Re:Wrong tag?
- F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 02:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Daredevil 101.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Daredevil 101.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:08, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Fixed by a good Samaritan. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 00:43, 10 December 2010 (UTC)