User talk:Genxer66

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rushbugled13 (talk) 21:36, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandra Van Zandt concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandra Van Zandt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:40, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandra Van Zandt


Hello Genxer66. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Sandra Van Zandt".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 19:00, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Serious Cigars


A tag has been placed on Serious Cigars, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:10, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Serious Cigars


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Serious Cigars requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jeremy112233 (talk) 20:19, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nancy kinder


The article Nancy kinder has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Lakun.patra (talk) 13:44, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Dexxtrall (talk) 11:16, 15 October 2019 (UTC) Dexxtrall (talk) I did not take money to make edits to Nancy Kinders page or was not paid to do so. Please remove me from this conflict page, please. Mrs. Kinder is a known Houston Philanthropist and has done much work for our community here in Houston including Discovery Green. I'm not sure I understand all this but would like to be exonerated. The updates I made where erroneous information I happened across in 2015. Thank you for tagging me. I appreciate the heads up. Genxer66 (talk

Nomination of Tom Kretzschmar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Kretzschmar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tom Kretzschmar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 13:09, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Beth Guide


The article Beth Guide has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Minor local celebrity, but currently doesn't meet our rules for notability, specifically does not meet WP:GNG. She might be notable based on her claimed earlier career, but these sections are unsourced. The current article reads more like a Resume/puff piece than an encyclopedia article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 18:24, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

The Mirror Cracked (talkI have old paper copies of the articles. Do you need them emailed. Do you just need the dates on them. Many go back to the 80s. I will rework this if you need me to as well. No problem. Also there will be a TV appearance on fox26 on monday. And also, there is hundreds of those over the last 10 years but they take them down over time. How do you want me to proceed there? Thanks in advance --Genxer66 (talk) 19:26, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Beth Guide for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beth Guide is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Beth Guide until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Knud Truelsen (talk) 12:25, 3 April 2022 (UTC)