User talk:Geo.plrd/Archives2006-5

MathStatWoman
I restored the sockpuppeteer template on MathStatWoman's Talk page that you removed. MathStatWoman has been confirmed as using sockpuppets on two separate occasions, by Checkuser admins (Kelly Martin and Fred Bauder, former and current ArbCom members). This is hardly "unproven". Please see my notes, especially on the recent activity from Special:Contributions/71.242.188.41. - David Oberst 01:19, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Contributing to Wikipedia
I am not and have never used an alias. I have never been a "sockpuppet" nor voted twice under different identities. I use a computer, a network, and wifi with many users. I shall not edit nor contribute until this template is removed from my talk page.

It is impossible that anyone has "proof", since it is a false accusation.

Wikipedia has been a place of unkindness, lack of justice, and unpleasantness so far. MathStatWoman 02:24, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Articles needing improvement
There are articles that need considerable improvement. Some of these are on probability, Probability space, Riemann hypothesis, prime numbers i.e. primes. Some Wikipedian, who knows mathematics, and is not unjustly accused of sockpuppetry, who is not being harassed, should work on these articles. They really are not good enough as they are now, and cannot be used as sources by students or researchers in their current state. MathStatWoman 00:17, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Moreover, the deletion of information on Biblical personae Utz and Buz, namely, their imprortance in the Haftarah and their story read during high holidays of Judaism, should be restored, again, by a Wikipedian who is not being unjustly accused and whose entries are targeted. MathStatWoman 00:26, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Where is the article on Haftarah? This is not "advertising" as posted on the discussion page. The Haftarah is an important part of Judaism, and the article should be re-instated. Who deleted it, and why? Of course, I will not contribute or reinstate an article, nor edit anything, except for your discussion page, due to how I was treated on Wikipedia.

I am concerned about the quality of Wikipedia due to what is happening with deletitons and reduction of information.

My discussion page was vandalized. What is the new encyclopedia that your friend has begun? A wikipedian who has been writing falsehoods about me, has wiped out that info.MathStatWoman 00:40, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Information you sent to me
When I clicked on the link you gave me about your friend's encyclopedia, I obtained the following message:

Object not found!

The requested URL was not found on this server. The link on the referring page seems to be wrong or outdated. Please inform the author of that page about the error.

If you think this is a server error, please contact the webmaster.

Error 404

www.editthis.info Tue Sep 19 19:15:53 2006 Apache/2.0.53 (Linux/SUSE) --

Hence:

Please advise.

MathStatWoman 23:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Ha ha Great Joke
Great joke. Your friend has created an empty wiki that anyone can do. Thanks for the laugh. MathStatWoman 04:52, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Motto noms
Please see hither, and cast thine vote. You have the deciding vote. Also, please look at the Overseer desk (I've made changes there, and added Childzy to the past-overseers list). Thanks. David P. A. Hunter, esq. III The rest is silence! 06:29, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Just about to usurp your position until you got back from what I assumed was a WikiBreak. Upon loading this here page I see at the top: "{{unblock|What the fuck!!! My IP is blocked}.}," so I shan't usurp it, unless you state otherwise... note that you'll need to remove the full stop (".") at the end of the template otherwise admins won't see it... And... try to use decent language too. They're admins. They have the power! Absolute power corrupts absolutely! Have fun with your negotiations. :-) David P. A. Hunter, Esq. III The rest is silence! Save Stargate SG-1! 00:18, 25 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Changed my mind. Usurping your position until you return. Just keeping the seat warm, and the desk cover'd in papers. David P. A. Hunter, Esq. III The rest is silence! Save Stargate SG-1! 00:18, 25 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Nevermind. Just realised you're posting at the noms and overseers desk pages. David P. A. Hunter, Esq. III The rest is silence! Save Stargate SG-1! 00:28, 25 September 2006 (UTC) Welcome back to the land of the Wikians.

WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006
The September 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 19:15, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Ummm... something... can't remember...
Oh, I remember now! How do you use your userbox template? I do not know how to "subst:" something (whatever that means), so if it entails doing that could you please explain that also? Thanks. Goiter McWilliostein, P. I. You can't control me! I'm a P. I.! Save Stargate SG-1! 12:38, 3 October 2006 (UTC) PS: I have my last two exams tomorrow. I shall then return to begin on the motto schedule.

Motto of the day, Episode IV: A New Hope
There's not yet a motto scheduled for tomorrow. Would you please pick one if Hunterd doesn't respond? -- Gray  Porpoise Phocoenidae, not Delphinidae 21:39, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

MOTD
Please see Wikipedia_talk:Motto_of_the_day about how to do the day by day of MOTD. Thanks! Reywas92 Talk 21:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Arbcab
Seeing as it's a wikipedia entity that you're looking to create, it would be best to keep it in the Wikipedia: namespace. As such, I've gone ahead and moved it from Arbcab to Arbcab. If this move has been in error, please let me know. ~Kylu ( u | t )  22:11, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Regarding Association of Members' Advocates
Hi, you are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as an active member of WP:AMA. If you aren't currently accepting inquiries for AMA, or if you have resigned, please de-list yourself from AMA Members. If you are still active, please consider tending to any new requests that may appear on Category:AMA Requests for Assistance. We're going to put AMA on wheels. :) Sorry for the template spamming - we're just trying to update our records, after we had a huge backlog earlier in the week (if you've been taking cases, then sorry, and please ignore this :)). Again, sorry, and thanks! M a  rtinp23  21:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006
The October 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:27, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Checkuser clerk
Are you still interested in helping out at WP:RFCU? If so, go ahead and add your name to the active list. We've had several clerks take breaks, and I'd like a break, too. Although that leaves 5 active clerks, there are still sometimes lags in archiving cases, so an extra hand to spread things out should be a good thing. Everything you should need to know is at Requests for checkuser/Clerks/Guide, and the clerk's noticeboard Requests for checkuser/Clerks/Requests (although some past discussions about policies are split between the noticeboard, its talk page, and various archives). The main tasks are, helping people with requests (formatting, the letter codes, adding links to relevant previous cases), and archiving answered requests. Ocassionally someone will create a new page rather than adding on to an old request; those should be merged and redirected to the main case page. If you have any questions you can ask me or any other active clerk.

If you are no longer interested, delist your name so I will know to ask the next person in line. Thanks. Thatcher131 01:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

UK Thrash article
Hi there. I note you're tagging this article for speedy deletion; I've been working with the author to explain the notability guidelines for websites after following up on a MedCab case, and had given him a couple of days to find proper sources; my intention is, if he cannot, to put it through AfD. My intention is to ensure that he doesn't feel the page's deletion is an attack in any way. Just for your information. Thanks. Tony Fox (arf!) 21:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I do recognize that the site is likely not notable enough to meet WP:WEB, and I've said that to the author. Like I say, he looks like he wants to be a contributor, so I wanted to take it a little slower and offered an opportunity for him to add sources before taking it to deletion. Tony Fox (arf!) 02:48, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Your sig
I don't mind a link in your sig to Esperanza, but that is the ONLY link in your sig, which is also not your user name. If anyone wants to find you, they have to dig through history, or wade through your Esperanza page before getting here. Please modify your sig so there is a link to your user or talk page, or your user name is recognizably shown, or both. Thanks much! KillerChihuahua?!? 21:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

MedCab
I don't understand Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-10-22_Swiftfox if I remove the request for a ban, can you help then? I've waited over a week, so I don't want to refile just for a technicality. Widefox 23:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I changed the request. Please reopen. Widefox 09:10, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Subst
Hi, not sure if you're aware, but Test templates should be substituted - thanks. KillerChihuahua?!? 16:19, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Gretaw
Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Gretaw (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 18:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC)