User talk:GeoLen85

Your submission at Articles for creation: Justin Packshaw (November 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Justin Packshaw and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Justin Packshaw, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Justin_Packshaw Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Justin_Packshaw reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:16, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello GeoLen85. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:GeoLen85. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. CUPIDICAE💕 15:11, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello Praxidicae. Thank you for the update. I have not received nor expect to receive any compensation directly, or indirectly. I do know the individual but there is no commercial relationship whatsoever. The hope was to resolve the issues flagged with the page in order to make it a more reliable source of information. If the changes improve the page can they not be accepted rather than reverting to a poorly referenced page with fewer citations? I absolutely respect the need to ensure Wikipedia is a trusted resource without the kind of paid bias that you mention. As I said the goal is to create a better resource for this public figure. Please can we revert to the improved version or flag that version to be reviewed GeoLen85 (talk) 15:27, 4 February 2021 (UTC)


 * How is that professional photo your own work, then? And please read WP:COI and refrain from editing it directly. CUPIDICAE💕  15:34, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

I will raise this on the talk page with a request edit as that seems the best approach. GeoLen85 (talk) 15:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Justin Packshaw
Hello, GeoLen85. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Justin Packshaw, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Justin Packshaw


Hello, GeoLen85. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Justin Packshaw".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:24, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Daily Mail reference at Justin Packshaw
Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Justin Packshaw. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:43, 15 February 2022 (UTC)