User talk:Geo Swan/archive/2018-09

__NOINDEX__

Disambiguation link notification for September 10
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Grand River (Ontario) ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Grand_River_%28Ontario%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Grand_River_%28Ontario%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to Kitchener and New Hamburg
 * Nith River ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Nith_River check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Nith_River?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to New Hamburg

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Humud Dakhil Humud Sa'id Al-((Jad'an
You created the an article at the title Humud Dakhil Humud Sa'id Al-((Jad'an in May 2006, moving it to Humud Dakhil Humud Sa'id Al Jad'an 1 minute later. The article was redirected to List of Saudi detainees at Guantanamo Bay in 2011. Do you think the original title still (with the "((") has value? If not you may want to tag it for G7 speedy deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 13:37, 17 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your interest.
 * I think you are suggesting that this is an implausible redirect...
 * On April 20th, and May 15th, 2006, the DoD published its first two official lists of captives held in Guantanamo. Prior to the publication of these lists the DoD refused to identify the men and boys.
 * The first list was of the 668 men and boys who had had a Combatant Status Review Tribunal convened to review whether they were an "enemy combatant". The second list was supposed to be a comprehensive list of everyone held in Guantanamo.
 * Almost 100 individuals had their names spelled inconsistently on the two lists. Wow.  How did that happen.
 * This man was one of over a dozen men who had parentheses in the DoD's official version of his name.
 * So, I disagree it was, it is, an implausible redirect.
 * Thousands of newspapers republished those official lists. Anyone looking at old references from 2006 could come across the old, apparently implausible names, and want to know who it really refered to.
 * Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 13:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Ok, fair enough - it is a plausible redirect then (contrary to my first thought). I'll copy this to the article talk page to enlighten anyone else who stumbles across it. Thryduulf (talk) 13:55, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.


 * Project news
 * The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
 * As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.


 * There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See New pages patrol/Coordination for more info to see if you can help out.


 * Other
 * A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.


 * Moving to Draft and Page Mover
 * Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
 * If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
 * Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
 * The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
 * The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge submissions
Not sure if you got this message before... The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its second-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. OhanaUnitedTalk page 07:07, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George McCullagh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Fulford ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/George_McCullagh check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/George_McCullagh?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 26 September 2018 (UTC)