User talk:Geo Swan/archive/2020-07

__NOINDEX__

Somebody AFDed Lynika Strozier which you created
Just wanted to give you a heads up since you created the article that some new user, as their very first action on Wikipedia, has created an AFD on Lynika Strozier. Deletion discussion is here. It's dumb, and its already turning into a SNOW keep but I wanted to notify you since they didn't have the courtesy to do so. --Krelnik (talk) 18:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I have eventually found a good reason for the AfD: the nominator wanted to give the article an accolade and a keep response at AfD was the easiest way of achieving it. Thincat (talk) 17:21, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minnesota Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob Kroll ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Minnesota_Board_of_Peace_Officer_Standards_and_Training check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Minnesota_Board_of_Peace_Officer_Standards_and_Training?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Heather Cerveny


The article Heather Cerveny has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:1E that attracted some coverage but no long-term significance."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Heather Cerveny for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heather Cerveny is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Heather Cerveny until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 07:26, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Seminci
Why are you changing perfectly working direct links to Seminci to links to a redirect to the same article, or worse, to redlinks? Your edit summary "disambiguation" does not actually indicate what you are doing here. Please revert all these changes. (And before you ask: no, I'm not hounding you, this change appeared in an article I created). Fram (talk) 07:15, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Carteret Fire Department for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carteret Fire Department is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Carteret Fire Department until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tinton5 (talk) 20:25, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carteret Fire Department, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Voice ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Carteret_Fire_Department check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Carteret_Fire_Department?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ Geo Swan (talk) 07:02, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Section links and anchors
Hello, I was just curious if your discussion on using anchors that started at the Classical Irish redirect discussion was continued anywhere else. -2pou (talk) 16:21, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, I just wanted to share a couple things with you that involve the use of wikilinks to sections. There is a database report located at Database reports/Broken section anchors that is populated every month with new links that go to sections or anchors that have been broken by a recent edit.  From this, there is at least one bot, Dexbot, that works to repair these links, as do individual editors out there.  It's not anywhere close to the dab fix setup, but there are people that work these maintenance tasks.  Just thought I'd point that out if you were not aware.  And by all means, if you have recommendations, try posting to the Talk page of that report.  All the best, 2pou (talk) 21:27, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Lynika Strozier
I don't know what your connection with the subject of the page is, or why you are so determined that the article should abandon any attempt at applying any critical reading of sources. Maybe you are simply so naive that you believe that journalists only ever write with an absolute dedication to the truth: maybe you are just so caught up in ownership of the page that you started that you cannot stand any alternative to your interpretation being proposed.

But I've tried to apply some encyclopaedic standard and you have proved determined not to allow it. I really couldn't be bothered banging my head on the brick wall of your close-mindedness any more. Have your poorly fact checked article that will get very few views just as crappy as you want it. Kevin McE (talk) 10:46, 25 July 2020 (UTC)


 * I replied on User_talk:Kevin_McE. Geo Swan (talk) 19:01, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Oliver Henry for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oliver Henry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Oliver Henry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 08:57, 26 July 2020 (UTC)


 * This disambiguation page was compliant with Disambiguation, and I think it never should have been nominated for deletion. Geo Swan (talk) 15:42, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muhammad Zahab, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The National.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:40, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

"USama Bin Laden" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect USama Bin Laden. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 28 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 12:19, 28 July 2020 (UTC)


 * , who made this nomination, also made, a day or two ago. Neither one of the nominations offered a policy based rationale for deletion.  Geo Swan (talk) 13:58, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

of old
Like more than ten years. (of old.) I saw you around a lot back then. I've had a couple of renames (I may have mentioned my outing concerns leading to renaming.) since then, and you either forgot me or never knew of me though I was around. I had a lot of admiration for you then. Now, I'm just puzzled. Either you have changed or I never really knew you. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 22:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Never new about the problems you reference. Perhaps I never really knew you at all. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 22:18, 31 July 2020 (UTC)