User talk:Geo ingram

Speedy deletion of History Of elements
A tag has been placed on History Of elements requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. A new name 2008 (talk) 01:35, 2 November 2008 (UTC) Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Clubmarx (talk) 01:36, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

If cars are linked to electric power systems and run by frequent recharges, capacitors will gain in importance. Unlike trains, when cars are driven by electricity, they cannot be charged by using overhead wires stretched along roads. And they cannot carry around enough energy source to run 400-500km, unlike gasoline-fueled vehicles.

So, we have to build an infrastructure that can frequently recharge cars with a small amount of energy at a time. As for cars, all they need are devices for quick recharge and discharge.

Then, which is a better energy source for plug-in hybrid vehicles, secondary battery or capacitor? I would go with capacitor because it has a high current capability and can be quickly charged. The discharging rates of secondary batteries are high, but it takes time to charge them.

For example, in the case of plug-in hybrid vehicles with secondary batteries, they need to be charged for one to two hours at home. Though some people say the charging time will be shortened to about 15 to 20 minutes in the near future, it's still long. In this respect, capacitors can be charged in about 30 seconds.

However, we should mount a small number of capacitors because it would take long to charge many of them.

There are more useful characteristics of capacitors. First, it has a long operating life because no chemical reaction occurs when it is being charged or discharged. Second, the remaining energy in a capacitor can be accurately known by checking its terminal voltage. Third, containing no heavy metal, it is more environmentally friendly. And there are more advantages of capacitor.

The energy density of capacitor is still lower than, for example, that of Li-ion secondary battery but may catch up with it due to technological advances in the future.

In my laboratory, we are developing one-seater electric vehicle "C-COMS," which runs only with electric double layer capacitors, as part of our research on future cars.

So, in effect, future cars are here, now! At least most of them are. It's amazing how many future cars exist today, from hydrogen to electric and biofuel vehicles to even flying cars. It is the intention of the site to cover all sorts of future cars, from those that exist today to the ones that are still on the drawing boards.

Of course, no one uses a drawing board today. That is so last year. Today, future cars are conceived on the computer in great detail. These future cars are actually concept vehicles, which have yet to be built. Once built, the future car is considered to be a prototype.

If a future car actually does move from concept to prototype, then the next step is for it to become a production vehicle. It is at this point that a future car is no longer considered to be so since it has arrived as a regular production model that anyone can buy. These are not the cars, however that will be featured on this site, unless, that is they happen to make it all the way from concept to production over the next several years.

The future cars we're concerned with are the concept and prototype vehicles that may one day make it to the showrooms, though most will not. Even though most future cars will not make it into the showrooms, they are valuable to many since they exhibit the possibilities for the future.

Design, architecture and powertrain technology in future cars can be drastically different than anything seen on a typical car lot. And, this is the way, many fans of concept and prototype vehicles like it. For instance, there have been a few wild hydrogen car prototypes that are of interest to future car fans, but are too expensive an impractical for everyday drivers.

Like science fiction, future cars fulfill a void in today's society. This kind of automobile gives people the room to dream, invent and create. There are so few restrictions on the future that one can let one's mind run wild and dream big when it comes to what the cars of the future will look like.

This is why future cars are so popular and why we wish to present a site devoted to the dreamers, inventors and creative types who wish to entertain all the possibilities of what the future for the automotive industry may hold.

Imagine this: Sometime in the future – private ownership of cars may be curtailed.

Car will then be shared but not owned. This will fundamentally change the way companies think of and develop cars. Cars will not be seen as possessions but as modes of transport. Cars will in short be PUBLIC TRANSPORT.

What then will these cars look like? Do post your ideas and discussion points. I would be very keen to hear what you think.

I mean for example: Automobiles have changed a lot since the end of the 20th century. They have gradually transformed into hybrid hydrogen fuel cell/electric motive devices, capable of the equivalent of several hundred miles-per-gallon efficiency, with little more than water as an exhaust product. This is making refueling something perhaps done only once every few months or so for many drivers-- and so commercial 'gas' stations have been declining in numbers for decades. Some of the latest, pricier car models are hybrids in more than power sources; they also possess hybrid suspensions combining both hovercraft-like air cushions and fully electronic wheel carriages, which allow the vehicles not only higher cruising speeds and fuel efficiency, but all-terrain capacities-- including comfortable traversing of swamps and large bodies of water which would have stopped even the formidable U.S. Army HumVee vehicles of the late 20th century. The new technology suspensions also provide (on more conventional roadways) all wheel steering and drive, 360 degree turn radiuses no bigger than the length of the vehicle, and full sideways movement as desired for parking, etc. The hybrid suspension allows the car's wheels to 'tread lightly' in travel, via a variable mode where in ideal, dry, straight line long spans the air cushion serves as the primary contact with the road, with the wheels touching only sufficiently to steer; but on curves or during braking, etc., the wheels may press harder against the road (the air cushion deflates)-- in other words, the vehicle uses its air cushion to vary its effective weight and kinetic friction where contact with the roadway is concerned. As today we should look for better ways to make more green cars, but for now let us all just rest and move forward to the future.

Speedy deletion of Abundance of Elemets
A tag has been placed on Abundance of Elemets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. A new name 2008 (talk) 01:36, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. A new name 2008 (talk) 01:38, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Cars in The Future"
A page you created, Cars in The Future, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is very short and provides little or no context.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Wysprgr2005 (talk) 01:38, 2 November 2008 (UTC)