User talk:GeoffEighinger

Welcome
Thanks for joining WikiProject NASCAR. Let me know if you need any help or have any questions to ask an experienced contributor. I work a lot on NASCAR articles (among other things) and I am an admin. My latest project has been getting 1992 Cup champion Alan Kulwicki's article to Good Article status, and I think it's getting close to a Featured Article nomination. Royal broil 01:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by "How does this peer review, classes, etc. stuff work?"? Are you offering to peer review Kulwicki's article? What classes? Royal broil  04:08, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, these are all good questions. I'll address them one by one.
 * 1. How do the reviews work? How does one go about rating something? Do they have to be of certain credibility or is it administration only?
 * I can tell from your comments that you have a warped view of administrators after having some bad experiences. It can be tough getting started in here. I'll help you if you want. Hopefully you'll feel better about admins after your experiences with me. Administrator only means that other contributors have decided that the user is trustworthy enough to be able to do things that would be dangerous in the wrong hands. Things like updating the main page, blocking contributors for bad behavior, protecting articles from vandalism or edit wars, etc. The blocking and enforcement tends to give admins a bad wrap. Being an admin has nothing to do with decisions about an article's status. It's a good indication that a person knows what's going on here at Wikipedia. There are plenty of other trusted contributors who never become administrators.


 * You should be able to rate articles, especially things that you are familiar with like NASCAR articles. Stub means that an article is short - from only a few sentences to around 1000 or 1500 characters. You can see the number of characters in an article by looking at its history. Start class means that it's beyond a stub to somewhat complete. B class means that it's at least somewhat complete to complete and that it has decent [{WP:REF|references]] from reliable sources. Good Article (GA) means that it passed a review in a semi-formal process. Get involvement from other experienced GA contributors before you do anything like that. "A" class means it's above GA class and it could be a featured article nominee. FA class is the highest class. It's a long and involved formal process.


 * Peer reviews are reviews by other contributors. They review the article to see how well it is written, if it follows the Manual of Style, makes sure it has solid references, etc.


 * 2. In the WikiNASCAR Project, who determines whether something is a stub or higher or whatever?
 * Anyone can review the article based on the criteria that I outlined above.


 * 3. Is there a way to continually work on an article without it being visible?
 * Yes! You've figured out one of the most importance things as of late. You need to create a sandbox (formally called a user subpage). That's how I now start all of my articles. The concept is that you start the article in your own (user) space so that you have time to develop the article without someone staring down at you. Too many articles are started that don't meet notability standards or are vandalism, so the new pages are watched carefully. Here's the directions on how to start your own page. When I started I liked to copy an existing page on someone/something who/what is simular to the new article. Royal broil  05:08, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You created the user sandbox correctly! I made minor modifications to the categories on Bob Latford's development article, which you can see by clicking on the history of the article. You cannot use another Wikipedia article as a reference in a different article. What you should do is transfer the reference used in the regulations article into the new article. Latford's article should have enough notability, so you should be able to publish it. To publish it, all you have to do is move the article (on the "move" tab on the top). I see more good information on him when searching on google, so I'd finish developing it first. You can directly publish article on NASCAR drivers if you have as much information as you do on Rick Newsom's sandbox article. NASCAR drivers, even with just one start, have proven to be notable in deletion discussions. Royal broil  13:04, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

An invitation to join WikiProject Ohio
 Hi, you are listed under Category:Wikipedians in Ohio or one of its subcategories. WikiProject Ohio has been slowing down and we're looking for active Ohioans to turn that around! But first, let us introduce ourselves; we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ohio and we're sure there's somewhere you'll fit in just fine. The project's departments include article quality assessment: We have over 5,000 articles to assess for class alone, newsletter writing: This has been delayed by a few months, and new page patrolling: Which has also been slowing down. We also have a newly formed taskforce on our over 1,000 townships at WP:OHTWP.

We have 132 members, many of which are not active within the project. If you are listed there and still received this message please accept the auotmated porcess's apologies. If you are interested in joining us please list you name here. If you're not interested please note this is a one time invite and you will never hear from us again.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to leave a message at our talkpage or with any member of the project, we'll be happy to answer any of your questions. We look forward to seeing you around!

Delivered by: §hepBot  ( Disable )  04:04, 25 October 2008 (UTC)



The first Wikipedian meetup in Ohio
Thanks! --Rkitko (talk) 19:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of List of drivers who have raced in Formula One, IndyCar and NASCAR for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of drivers who have raced in Formula One, IndyCar and NASCAR is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of drivers who have raced in Formula One, IndyCar and NASCAR until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. QueenCake (talk) 13:55, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of families who have competed in NASCAR


The article List of families who have competed in NASCAR has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Long-term unreferenced article on a subject that is arguably trivia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Bushranger One ping only 02:32, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of NASCAR double duty performers


The article List of NASCAR double duty performers has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Long-term unreferenced article that is pure trivia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Bushranger One ping only 02:34, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

You're invited! Great Buckeye Wiknic 2016


Hello there! You are invited to attend the Great Buckeye Wiknic in Columbus, Ohio on Sunday, July 10th from 1:00 to 5:00 PM! Join us for a day in the park for food and socializing with others from the Wikimedia movement. We'll be meeting up at Fred Beekman Park, a park on Ohio State University's campus.

If you're interested, please take a look at our events page for more information, including parking info, food options, and available activities. If you plan on attending, please add your name to the attendees list. We look forward to seeing you!

If you have any questions, feel free to leave one on my talk page. Thanks! ~ Super  Hamster  Talk Contribs 05:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

(Note: If you would like to stop receiving notifications regarding Wikimedia events around Ohio, you may remove your username from this list.)

Nomination of The World's Number One, Flat-Out, All-Time Great Stock Car Racing Book for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The World's Number One, Flat-Out, All-Time Great Stock Car Racing Book is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The World's Number One, Flat-Out, All-Time Great Stock Car Racing Book until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 04:44, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of NASCAR drivers who have won in each of top three series for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of NASCAR drivers who have won in each of top three series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of NASCAR drivers who have won in each of top three series until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - "Ghost of  Dan Gurney"  18:37, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:NASCAR Triple Threats
Template:NASCAR Triple Threats has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Paradoctor (talk) 06:59, 6 January 2022 (UTC)