User talk:Geoff Plourde/Archive 4

Official Invitation to GA Sweeps
I would like to invite you to participate at GA Sweeps. We decided it's time to give GA a good sweep to ensure the qualities of all GA articles. You recevied this invitation because we felt that you can improve and uphold the quality of Good articles. This is the reason why only experienced reviewers who are established (trusted) within the project should participate in this sweep initially.

Please take a look at the project page and see if you wish to participate in the Sweeps. OhanaUnitedTalk page 15:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Toyota Aurion
I have reverted your passing of the article as GA as you did not provide a review summary on the talk page of the article. This is required even for reviews that conclude in promoting articles, as it serves as a proof that the reviewer did indeed review against all of the WIAGA and it certifies that he or she did make sure it fulfills all the conditions. As a sidenote, I took a brief look at the article and have found numerous flaws that would merit at least a hold, if not immediate failing of the nom. I cannot get down to reviewing it now, though, I would just like to advise you that you might want to re-review the article and make sure you check against all criteria. Regards, PrinceGloria 19:38, 18 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Hello again - I have been discussing the issue with the article's authors and came to the conclusion that I will deliver a complete GA review in the article. In case the issue is of interest to you, let's keep in touch. PrinceGloria 15:31, 19 October 2007 (UTC)


 * No prob, same here (sans lunch hour ;) ). Cheers, PrinceGloria 10:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Approved as reviewer
I have approved you as a reviewer. Good luck! Please let me know how you get on. — Thomas H. Larsen 07:57, 7 February 2008 (UTC)