User talk:Geoff Plourde/Archive 5

My RfC
Thanks for contributing, I notice you would support a civility probabtion, with the potential of a future block, for harassing Edokter. Of the 19 instances which supposidly "summarise the conflict", only two of these nineteen images listed at the RFC were anything to do with Edokter, both of which were deleted as they failed WP:NFC. I am hard pushed to see how this is targetting one particular user, am I missing something? Fasach Nua (talk) 20:24, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Failed "good article" nomination
Upon its review on February 18, 2008, this good article nomination was quick-failed because it:


 * had a virtual or complete lack of reliable sources

thus making it ineligible for good article consideration. According to WP:Verifiability, "Material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, must be attributed to a reliable, published source."

This article did not receive a thorough review, and may not meet other parts of the good article criteria. I encourage you to remedy this problem (and any others) and resubmit it for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far. --Hemlock Martinis (talk) 23:32, 18 February 2008 (UTC)