User talk:Geoffrey.s.johnson

December 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 23:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I disagree. There is no original research involved in my contributions .  I can easily link to other wikipedia pages.  Please reinstate my contributions. Geoffrey.s.johnson (talk) 19:23, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Waiting a bit and adding the same original research will not work. MrOllie (talk) 19:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Bridge troll. Geoffrey.s.johnson (talk) 20:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Personal attacks will not change the simple fact that you do not have reliable sources that support your additions. MrOllie (talk) 20:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * No personal attacks, just statements of fact. You deleted my revision without even looking at my citations. Geoffrey.s.johnson (talk) 20:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I did. They do not contain the information you're adding to the page. Sources must directly and exactly cover what they are citing. Those cites don't even mention the Sleeping Beauty problem. You can't just throw up a generic cite that mentions Bayes's theorem and then construct your own original argument using the theorem, that isn't how Wikipedia is written. MrOllie (talk) 20:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I meant to add my contributions under the new section called "Ambiguous question position," but you removed by statements before I had a chance to move them to the appropriate section where citations already exist. You seem a little trigger happy rather than being helpful.  Geoffrey.s.johnson (talk) 20:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Adding content that doesn't meet Wikipedia's core content policies is unhelpful (and make no mistake, it would not no matter what section it was placed in) - and you've been made aware of this before. MrOllie (talk) 20:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)