User talk:Geoffreylee286

Hi Geoffrey,

I deleted your recent article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts or show that it meets the notability guidelines. Although it had a references section, these did not verify most of the facts claimed, and Wikipedia does not count as a reliable source. A longish, well written article, complete with Chinese characters but no links to other Wikipedia articles is always going to look like copyright even if it isn't. It's also very spammy legendary...distinguished... and many similar, without any supporting references. I'll recreate the article shortly here. It would help to make your refs more intelligible by formatting as [url description], so http://www.concrete.org/MEMBERS/mem_info_honorary.htm becomes Concrete industry members and appears as Concrete industry members. Better still, put your refs in-line, and put in your References section, so we can see exactly what each ref is supporting. See Edwin Taylor Pollock as an example of a top class, neutral fully referenced and encyclopaedic biography, although that should be an aspiration rather than an expectation. Also drop the disclaimer, no article is ever finished.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:32, 28 November 2010 (UTC)