User talk:Geologist~enwiki

Science pearls
Hello,

Since you contributed in the past to the publications’ lists, I thought that you might be interested in this new project. I’ll be glad if you will continue contributing. Thanks,APH 10:52, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peter Szatmari (geologist)


The article Peter Szatmari (geologist) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article is basically unreferenced (only "reference" is to an article published by the subject". Web of Science lists only 25 articles, cited 327 times in total with an h-index of 10. GS gives an h-index of 6 (searching for "Peter Szatmari and geology" - there is another researcher in a different field of the same name. The external link goes to an interview in his employer's magazine and is therefore not independent. No other independent sources available. Does not meet WP:PROF.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 11:37, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter Szatmari (geologist) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Szatmari (geologist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Peter Szatmari (geologist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crusio (talk) 03:42, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:800px-Fábrica ferro Sorocaba 1884.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:800px-Fábrica ferro Sorocaba 1884.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:ScreenShot154.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ScreenShot154.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:07, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Ciclovia sorocaba1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ciclovia sorocaba1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:09, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:ScreenShot154.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ScreenShot154.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:53, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Use of Undo
When you "undo" or revert an edit with the undo button you are expected or required to explain why unless the edit you are undoing is simple vandalism. Your recent revert here was not undoing vandalism. Please explain your edits with succinct edit summaries or with talk page discussion. Vsmith (talk) 02:00, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Abiogenic petroleum origin
With respect to this edit, I'm not sure what you're trying to do. The first citation, from Science (journal) doesn't say what you think it says. It makes no mention of an abiogenic origin for oil. Your second citation is a blog, from someone who seems to have been sucked into Gold's theories. I've noticed this a lot across sciences. Individuals who don't have any specific knowledge of another field of science, think they do. It's arrogance, usually, but it also because they aren't that much smarter about the field than most people. Just because Gold is a physicist doesn't mean he knows more about the formation of oil than you or I do. So, you need to review WP:RS, so that you understand what qualifies as a reliable source. Also, we do note give undue weight to fringe theories. Orange Marlin Talk• Contributions 02:44, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Please read WP:NPA. Any further such attacks will not be tolerated. Vsmith (talk) 02:52, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring
Please read the edit warring policy and proceed with caution. Vsmith (talk) 04:14, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Geologist. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Geologist~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:03, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 13:13, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Miguel Sutil


The article Miguel Sutil has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of notability. Only ref is a book of genealogy. Orphaned for nearly a decade."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pepper Beast   (talk)  16:55, 18 April 2022 (UTC)