User talk:Geometric777

Proposed deletion of Faudree Effect


The article Faudree Effect has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The term "Faudree Effect" does not appear in any primary literature search or Google search (modulo Wikipedia mirrors). The given primary source has received negligible citation. The term does not exist, and the research does not meet WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 98.122.178.110 (talk) 07:27, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Faudree Effect for deletion
The article Faudree Effect is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Faudree Effect until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Electrified Fooling Machine (talk) 03:22, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Faudree Effect


A tag has been placed on Faudree Effect, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 18:44, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Faudree Effect
Hello. I'm not sure what it is you are doing at the article Faudree Effect. You blanked it with an edit summary saying "article deleted do not want to settle the issue". It was then deleted. Now you have posted the text again. That being so I have restored the deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Faudree Effect for the community to come to a consensus on whether the subject meets the inclusion criteria for an article in the encyclopedia. Please comment there. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:02, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Reply Faudree Effect
Hello. This is Geometric777. Don't you know not every reputable academic journal is on the internet? The SAMPE Journal is not on the internet, but is available in any main city and university library, hence it is public. To verify, you actually have to go to a library to check it out. I would put a pdf on the web but I'm very busy with my Ph.D. now, so if you really want to delete the article now, go ahead. But check the library first. There is much more information out there than from just a click of a button...(Geometric777 (talk) 05:23, 25 January 2011 (UTC)).