User talk:Geordiekimbo

This message is regarding the page Kate Beckinsale. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Yamla 02:36, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Kate Beckinsale, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --Yamla 16:29, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! You added lots of citations to the Kate Beckinsale page. When you do that, you are free to remove the fact tag requesting citations. Also, I corrected one of your pieces of information. You said she placed 89 on some list when in fact, the citation shows she placed 85. Anyway, thanks for the good work! --Yamla 17:20, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Georgette2.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Georgette2.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ik.pas.aan 23:50, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Photo found on another site. I believe it to be a publicity photo. I found and changed the photo to the watermarked one. The photo appears in a number of websites and looks to be a publicity photo.

Regarding filmographies for porn stars
Hi there. I'm talking to you regarding an issue that was brought to my attention by a few Wikipedians. Apparently, you have been adding lists of needlessly long filmographies to porn star articles, such as the Debi Diamond article. Needless to say, since we already link to filmographies from off site sources (IAFD and IMDB), we do not need to repeat this information. If you wish to seriously condense this information into a listing of a select, notable few list of movies, then this would be quite fine. If you have any questions, please let me know. I am here to help in any way possible. Thank you! -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 02:55, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Please cite your sources
As an admin who primarly tackles porn bios, I've been looking over your contributions and noticed that you do not cite your sources for information you provide in biographical entries. It is vital that information posted on Wikipedia needs to be sourced, so that it can be independently verified. Thank you. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 03:10, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Noted i will go through my contributions and add sources when i can...have to find many of them again..:-) Geordiekimbo 20:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Please rewrite your contributions
I'm sorry to have to do this, but I'm notifying you that copying biographies from outside sources is not permitted on Wikipedia. Please rewrite your contributons using outside sources as references, otherwise the articles will have to be deleted to protect Wikipedia from any copyright lawsuits. Thank you. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 03:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Noted, I'll reword them where applicable. In most cases the biographies are copied in several areas already, but i will complyGeordiekimbo 19:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:Nicholaholt3.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Nicholaholt3.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image copyright problem with Image:Emmanixon2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Emmanixon2.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags.

Image copyright problem with Image:Teri-diver-sized.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Teri-diver-sized.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 00:42, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Angelica bella.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Angelica bella.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 18:21, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Sara_stockbridge_01.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sara_stockbridge_01.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 21:41, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Emma Nixon


The article Emma Nixon has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No significant coverage and doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epbr123 (talk) 10:39, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Temptress (actress) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Temptress (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Temptress (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz Humbug! 23:16, 11 December 2015 (UTC)